runsforcelery wrote:There's actually a sort of fundamental question here. Is the Alignment
wrong about its objectives while Beowulf is correct to
fear those objectives? Or is the Alignment only wrong about it's
tactics, while Beowulf is wrong to fear the MA's final objective but right about its own tactics and
morality?There are, of course, a host of other questions. I simply submit these two for your consideration.

To answer the first part of the question, we would have to state the final objective of the MAlign. If that objective is the optimal improvement of the human race, then it would be fair to say they share that objective with Beowulfers. Now, there might be intermediate goals (like ruling the galaxy) that are incompatible with those of Beowulfers, but the final one are likely the same.
The second part of the question is where the differences are most likely to arise. How do the experimenters treat the fluvial residue of their continuing stream of experimental failures? I believe that the Beowulf code tries to address the fundamental humanity of the subjects of experimentation. So, to move too quickly risks getting results that are incompatible with the fundamental human structure. Frankie Simoez(sp?) is the perfect example. To the MAlign she was a failed experiment and needed to be discarded. Her father rebelled at her being discarded like the residue found at the bottom of a petri dish. She was his cherished daughter, not a failed experiment.
The Skrags are another more subtle failure. They were not a failure in that their modifications were successful in their primary intent. The problem arose in the secondary mods. Those overly aggressive characteristics were initially exaggerated to antisocial levels by treating them as separate from humanity. The way these people's following generations were raised exaggerated those very antisocial characteristics. They continued to believe they were separated from humanity by those very characteristics. Honor might well have that same aggressiveness, but was able to incorporate it well primarily because she was treated as a treasured child, not some biology experiment or amoral inhuman predator that simply looks human.
All in all, the second part of the question is more likely to ruffle Beowulfian feathers. Sure, experimenting with the human genome is ok, so long as you treat the subject of those experiments as though they are the human beings they truly are. Limit the risks to reduce the potential cost to the subject of experimentation by limiting the degree of change to the genome. The Beowulf Code of Bioethics is merely Beowulf's best reasoned guideline to avoid ignoring the humanity of experimenting with the human genome.