Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Jonathan_S and 14 guests

New Manty ship ideas.

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: New Manty ship ideas.
Post by Werrf   » Sat Oct 12, 2013 12:16 am

Werrf
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 7:47 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Theemile wrote:Ghosts and Sharks are also spider drive ships, as are the ~5kton graser torp. The Detweilers are merely the top of the heap.

Sure, but the Detweilers were the only class built specifically for combat. Ghosts were scout ships, and Sharks were trainers. For a genuine combat-optimised Spider ship, we need to look at the Detweilers.
Theemile wrote:They not only have no wedge, they have no sidewalls to protect their armor. Yes, a large ship can generate a bubble sidewall, but it cannot generate the bubble sidewall while the spider is running.

But once you are engaged in combat, the advantage of surprise is gone, so you can disable the spider and activate a sidewall bubble.
Theemile wrote:So Lord Skimpers basic point remains: spider drive ships place much of their protection in the basket of not being seen. Once they are seen, their chances of survival plummets.

Until we see them in combat, I'm not ready to write them off. I picture them as using stealth to approach a target, then dropping their stealth and switching to 'combat mode', for want of a better term, where they become 'visible' by activating sidewalls and active sensors, and blowing the living daylights out of anything they face - essentially, stealthy, offensive forts.
Top
Re: New Manty ship ideas.
Post by KNick   » Sat Oct 12, 2013 12:22 am

KNick
Admiral

Posts: 2142
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:38 am
Location: Billings, MT, USA

Jonathan_S wrote:
KNick wrote:As I see it, the only advantage an SD(P) or a CLAC has over a DD or CL is it's Marine compliment. This will hold true unless another navy (other than allies) put a successful design in space. And how often do you actually need a full battalion of Marines? In the event of a natural disaster, maybe. Then it might be good to have a whole bunch of uninvolved but motivated personnel. Or SAR after combat, if the damaged ship still has people feeling rambunctious. For most other situations a company or maybe a platoon works just fine.
"Only advantage" is a bit much. Yes, a Wolfhound, Avalon, or especially Roland might be able mission kill a SLN SD; and any of them should be more than a match for a SLN BC or two. But they're still something of a glass cannon; if anything big does manage to end up in range and land a hit they're going to get hurt badly

And against a Lenard Detwiler they're not likely to fair so well. (Since the first indication is likely to be several pods of missiles going off in your face)

And SD(P) not only has far more combat endurance (it and throw more missile for a much longer time) it also has vastly tougher active and passive defenses and can hack getting caught in energy range of any SLN combatant. (However unlikely that may be).


Yes, once peace is reestablished it's quite likely that the size of navies will shrink, and that more of the heaviest combatants will be mothballed or scrapped than the lighter one. But that doesn't mean against a near-equal tech opponent a CA can stand up against an SD. You can scale back, but you've still got to keep an eye on what potential enemies might be doing. And there's still going to be a solid wall of SD(P)s and CLACs (unless some other top end capital ship design supersedes them); given Manticore's economic mussels that wall is likely to be significantly larger than their pre-war build-up size but far smaller than their peak mid-war size.


Agreed. However a reduction from 250 or so SD(P)s to 150 would allow for the deployment of anywhere from 300-400 DDs, CAs and CLs to close to a thousand, while still maintaining a creditable wall. And such a reduction will only happen if the electorate and the government are convinced that the shooting is over.
_


Try to take a fisherman's fish and you will be tomorrows bait!!!
Top
Re: New Manty ship ideas.
Post by Cheopis   » Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:52 am

Cheopis
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1633
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:04 am

Theemile wrote:
Werrf wrote:Spider drive ships are big. Like, really big. Like, you remember that discussion about hyper-capable forts a little while ago? Detweilers are essentially those, with the added wrinkle of being currently undetectable. Sure, they have no wedge, but think how many times recently we've heard about dozens of missiles wasting themselves on the wedge but the ship being destroyed anyway by overwhelming fire? In the age of pod-layer combat, the wedge is no longer the impenetrable defence it once was.

In your hypothetical Shrike vs Spider, the Shrike is dead. Sure, it can approach faster and get some shots off, but then it dies. The best it can hope for is cratering the spider's armour - and even that assumes it can find the bloody thing in the first place.


Ghosts and Sharks are also spider drive ships, as are the ~5kton graser torp. The Detweilers are merely the top of the heap. They not only have no wedge, they have no sidewalls to protect their armor. Yes, a large ship can generate a bubble sidewall, but it cannot generate the bubble sidewall while the spider is running. So Lord Skimpers basic point remains: spider drive ships place much of their protection in the basket of not being seen. Once they are seen, their chances of survival plummets.

Yes, a Detweiler can probably swat a Shrike ( something the other spiderdrive ship could not easily do. ) But to do so, it has to use it's weapons, letting everyone know where it is at and has to stop dead to fire up the bubble wall to keep the Shrike (now with advanced bow-wall Graser lensing!) from opening it up like a soup can. Either way, every other defensive unit in system will localize it and pound it mercilessly - it can't run and has to choose between protection or attempting to hide.


As far as I know, there's absolutely nothing in textev to indicate that Dettweilers aren't being designed to carry a heavily armored tug with them, with defensive capability, which would detach from the Dettweiler, then fire up a wedge, then tractor back into a docking station on the Dettweiler, and give the Dettweiler both a wedge and reasonable acceleration in combat.

In a way, similar to the Keyhole system. The keyhole system distributes sensor and communications systems to a hull outside the main hull. The Dettweiler tugs might distribute wedge generation to a hull outside the main hull.

This is something vaguely like when ships would deploy longboats in the days of sail to tow a ship with no sails or a ship caught for a long time with no winds.
Top
Re: New Manty ship ideas.
Post by munroburton   » Sat Oct 12, 2013 5:08 am

munroburton
Admiral

Posts: 2374
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:16 am
Location: Scotland

Cheopis wrote:As far as I know, there's absolutely nothing in textev to indicate that Dettweilers aren't being designed to carry a heavily armored tug with them, with defensive capability, which would detach from the Dettweiler, then fire up a wedge, then tractor back into a docking station on the Dettweiler, and give the Dettweiler both a wedge and reasonable acceleration in combat.

In a way, similar to the Keyhole system. The keyhole system distributes sensor and communications systems to a hull outside the main hull. The Dettweiler tugs might distribute wedge generation to a hull outside the main hull.

This is something vaguely like when ships would deploy longboats in the days of sail to tow a ship with no sails or a ship caught for a long time with no winds.


There's absolutely nothing in textev to indicate anything like that either. I think compensators wouldn't be able to work without a direct connection to the impeller wedge - the "sump" Weber refers to. The spider ship would still be limited by its grav plating. It would also violate textev about the fixed diameters of impeller rings in relation to the mass of the vessel.

All we definitely know about the Detweilers: Spider drive superdreadnought capable of firing graser torpedoes internally, acceleration limited by grav plating(no better than the Sharks). We don't know anything else except the MAlign is building dozens of them.
Top
Re: New Manty ship ideas.
Post by John Prigent   » Sat Oct 12, 2013 5:42 am

John Prigent
Captain of the List

Posts: 592
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:05 am
Location: Sussex, England

We've already seen a number of occasions in various books where the lack of a proper Marine complement on smaller ships has been a distinct problem. Boarding actions against pirates come to mind, but there's also a problem when a ship is captured and Marines are needed as guards for he original crew while a few Navy people fly the ship, but there aren't enough Marines so the Manty ship has to operate with a dangerously reduced crew. DDs and CLs aren't big enough to carry the Marines needed for anti-piracy work, so CAs and other large ships will still be needed - unless piracy suddenly stops which doesn't seem likely.
Cheers
John
KNick wrote:As I see it, the only advantage an SD(P) or a CLAC has over a DD or CL is it's Marine compliment. This will hold true unless another navy (other than allies) put a successful design in space. And how often do you actually need a full battalion of Marines? In the event of a natural disaster, maybe. Then it might be good to have a whole bunch of uninvolved but motivated personnel. Or SAR after combat, if the damaged ship still has people feeling rambunctious. For most other situations a company or maybe a platoon works just fine.

Once some kind of peace deal is worked out, the SDs and CLACs will be the first to be mothballed. Manticore will probably be able to keep 8-10 DDs or CLs in service for the same personnel and maintenance costs, equating to more hulls in more places, able to do more missions. If completely new weapons systems are developed, it might be necessary to design new capitol ships. otherwise "good enough" is good enough.
Top
Re: New Manty ship ideas.
Post by Werrf   » Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:07 am

Werrf
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 7:47 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

munroburton wrote:All we definitely know about the Detweilers: Spider drive superdreadnought capable of firing graser torpedoes internally, acceleration limited by grav plating(no better than the Sharks). We don't know anything else except the MAlign is building dozens of them.

We don't know that they're superdreadnought-sized either. Without the limiting factor of compensator efficiency, they could be effectively any size. I've always understood them to be larger than SDs.
Top
Re: New Manty ship ideas.
Post by KNick   » Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:17 am

KNick
Admiral

Posts: 2142
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:38 am
Location: Billings, MT, USA

Werrf wrote:
munroburton wrote:All we definitely know about the Detweilers: Spider drive superdreadnought capable of firing graser torpedoes internally, acceleration limited by grav plating(no better than the Sharks). We don't know anything else except the MAlign is building dozens of them.

We don't know that they're superdreadnought-sized either. Without the limiting factor of compensator efficiency, they could be effectively any size. I've always understood them to be larger than SDs.


The size that sticks in my mind is 10M tons, as opposed to the 8M or so of Manti SD(P)s.
_


Try to take a fisherman's fish and you will be tomorrows bait!!!
Top
Re: New Manty ship ideas.
Post by Jonathan_S   » Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:41 am

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8761
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

munroburton wrote:All we definitely know about the Detweilers: Spider drive superdreadnought capable of firing graser torpedoes internally, acceleration limited by grav plating(no better than the Sharks). We don't know anything else except the MAlign is building dozens of them.
I thought (but haven't bothered to go back and look) that we'd been told that the Detweilers were pod-laying. So that's one other little thing we know [G]

So presumably you have to worry about getting a face full of Cataphract-Cs in addition to some graser torpedoes.
Top
Re: New Manty ship ideas.
Post by munroburton   » Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:19 am

munroburton
Admiral

Posts: 2374
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:16 am
Location: Scotland

John Prigent wrote:We've already seen a number of occasions in various books where the lack of a proper Marine complement on smaller ships has been a distinct problem. Boarding actions against pirates come to mind, but there's also a problem when a ship is captured and Marines are needed as guards for he original crew while a few Navy people fly the ship, but there aren't enough Marines so the Manty ship has to operate with a dangerously reduced crew. DDs and CLs aren't big enough to carry the Marines needed for anti-piracy work, so CAs and other large ships will still be needed - unless piracy suddenly stops which doesn't seem likely.
Cheers
John
KNick wrote:As I see it, the only advantage an SD(P) or a CLAC has over a DD or CL is it's Marine compliment. This will hold true unless another navy (other than allies) put a successful design in space. And how often do you actually need a full battalion of Marines? In the event of a natural disaster, maybe. Then it might be good to have a whole bunch of uninvolved but motivated personnel. Or SAR after combat, if the damaged ship still has people feeling rambunctious. For most other situations a company or maybe a platoon works just fine.

Once some kind of peace deal is worked out, the SDs and CLACs will be the first to be mothballed. Manticore will probably be able to keep 8-10 DDs or CLs in service for the same personnel and maintenance costs, equating to more hulls in more places, able to do more missions. If completely new weapons systems are developed, it might be necessary to design new capitol ships. otherwise "good enough" is good enough.


At the end of the day, most of the new classes were designed to destroy enemy warships which the Rolands, Sag-Cs and Nikes seem to do extraordinarily well. They were designed and built after a decade of war in which there was relatively little need for Marines. There's a reason they're cross-trained as damage control personnel.

According to House of Steel, the RMN deployed four dozen Kamerling-class system control cruisers in and after 1921, each of which carried three Marine companies. Unfortunately, packing in enough life support and small craft capability reduces its offensive power to less than that of an Avalon-class light cruiser, despite being almost twice as voluminous - and building a Kamerling requires the same slip that could build a Sag-C.

We haven't seen many Marines late in the series because most of them are in Silesia where planetary populations are much more fractious than in Talbott.

Werrf wrote:
munroburton wrote:All we definitely know about the Detweilers: Spider drive superdreadnought capable of firing graser torpedoes internally, acceleration limited by grav plating(no better than the Sharks). We don't know anything else except the MAlign is building dozens of them.

We don't know that they're superdreadnought-sized either. Without the limiting factor of compensator efficiency, they could be effectively any size. I've always understood them to be larger than SDs.


Ok - reinforces my point about how little information on them there is. We know they're big, slow, supposedly invisible to current sensors and are equipped with powerful weapons. We have no textev on what fills the Detweiler's hull - how many missile/torpedo/CM launchers, grasers, point defense clusters, drones, etc..

Until they start shooting at the RMN, we won't know how they stack up. Even the Mesans don't know because they seem to be assuming nobody will be able to detect them, despite surviving Weyland crew, Bolthole and a Mesan defector working together on precisely this issue with all the motivation in the galaxy.

If a GA sensor drone gets close enough to a spidership for non-gravitic sensors to detect them, if it manages to transmit this data to a mother ship and if this ship manages to get away, the spider ship is almost certainly busted. That's if the MAlign deploys them against the GA again. Most implications are they're intended for use against the League.

There's always a possible "coincidence" as well, like four Peep BCs dropping out of hyper inside energy range of a DN in SVW and a destroyer squadron getting caught by a Peep attack force while on training manoeuvres near the hyper limit. Pretty much demonstrating the difference between a lucky CO and a good CO - the DN's captain was snoozing in his/her quarters whilst the officer with the lowest tac scores had the watch and the DesRon CO died in action despite getting most of her squadron away.
Top
Re: New Manty ship ideas.
Post by thinkstoomuch   » Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:24 am

thinkstoomuch
Admiral

Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: United States of America

Jonathan_S wrote:I thought (but haven't bothered to go back and look) that we'd been told that the Detweilers were pod-laying. So that's one other little thing we know [G]

So presumably you have to worry about getting a face full of Cataphract-Cs in addition to some graser torpedoes.


Not to disagree.

I can never find it but I "remember" where RFC said that we haven't seen the best of the Malign's current weapons. It was in direct reply to something I wrote, I think. So it kind of sticks in my little mind.

So those Detwielers may have something even worse.

Enjoy,
T2M
-----------------------
Q: “How can something be worth more than it costs? Isn’t everything ‘worth’ what it costs?”
A: “No. That’s just the price. ...
Christopher Anvil from Top Line in "War Games"
Top

Return to Honorverse