Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

HFQ Official Snippet #17

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #17
Post by Direwolf18   » Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:33 pm

Direwolf18
Captain of the List

Posts: 506
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:39 pm

For what its worth, I don't think there is anything in Earl Hanth, Admiral Hywyt, or Captain Bahrns personalities that would indicate for one second that they wouldn't create the biggest frigging boom that they could get away with. They seem like the kind of souls who are primarily concerned with "Getting sh*t done". I very much foresee using as much explosives as physically possible without jeopardizing the mission by being overloaded. And not an ounce less.


Overkill is under-appreciated.
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #17
Post by JimHacker   » Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:40 pm

JimHacker
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:12 pm
Location: UK

Direwolf18 wrote:For what its worth, I don't think there is anything in Earl Hanth, Admiral Hywyt, or Captain Bahrns personalities that would indicate for one second that they wouldn't create the biggest frigging boom that they could get away with. They seem like the kind of souls who are primarily concerned with "Getting sh*t done". I very much foresee using as much explosives as physically possible without jeopardizing the mission by being overloaded. And not an ounce less.


Overkill is under-appreciated.


There is no such thing as overkill; there is only "open fire!" and "reload!". Something I heard once :D

While I'm sure they may have wanted to use as much explosive as possible, they will have been limited by certain factors - such as how much was available (if a new explosive), how much a person could safely carry/swim with/handle/set in this particular mission, and conserving supply (if a new explosive produced in small quantities).
-------------------------------
Happiness is not having what you want
Nor is happiness wanting what you have
Happiness is believing that tomorrow you shall have
what you want today

..//^ ^\\
(/(_•_)\)
.._/''*''\_
.(,,,)^(,,,)
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #17
Post by n7axw   » Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:44 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Direwolf18 wrote:For what its worth, I don't think there is anything in Earl Hanth, Admiral Hywyt, or Captain Bahrns personalities that would indicate for one second that they wouldn't create the biggest frigging boom that they could get away with. They seem like the kind of souls who are primarily concerned with "Getting sh*t done". I very much foresee using as much explosives as physically possible without jeopardizing the mission by being overloaded. And not an ounce less.


Overkill is under-appreciated.


Chances are none of these august individuals had anything directly to do with choosing the size of the explosives. They just told their team: get rid of the bloody barges... and then turned it over to someone who actually knew what they were doing...although experts can occasionally be over rated. :lol:

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #17
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:13 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

n7axw wrote:
Direwolf18 wrote:For what its worth, I don't think there is anything in Earl Hanth, Admiral Hywyt, or Captain Bahrns personalities that would indicate for one second that they wouldn't create the biggest frigging boom that they could get away with. They seem like the kind of souls who are primarily concerned with "Getting sh*t done". I very much foresee using as much explosives as physically possible without jeopardizing the mission by being overloaded. And not an ounce less.


Overkill is under-appreciated.


Chances are none of these august individuals had anything directly to do with choosing the size of the explosives. They just told their team: get rid of the bloody barges... and then turned it over to someone who actually knew what they were doing...although experts can occasionally be over rated. :lol:

Don

And none of the individuals in the entire chain of command are members of the inner circle, so they can't query OWL on the proper amounts to use - If they are really using some of the new explosives instead of black powder, yeah, they'll overdo it.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #17
Post by Tonto Silerheels   » Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:07 pm

Tonto Silerheels
Captain of the List

Posts: 454
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:01 pm

fallsfromtrees wrote:

And none of the individuals in the entire chain of command are members of the inner circle, so they can't query OWL on the proper amounts to use - If they are really using some of the new explosives instead of black powder, yeah, they'll overdo it.

Just as there was testing of the new corned powder, bagged charges, and trunnions in Charis prior to their first use in anger, I'm sure that the new explosives saw testing.

~Tonto
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #17
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:10 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

Tonto Silerheels wrote:fallsfromtrees wrote:

And none of the individuals in the entire chain of command are members of the inner circle, so they can't query OWL on the proper amounts to use - If they are really using some of the new explosives instead of black powder, yeah, they'll overdo it.

Just as there was testing of the new corned powder, bagged charges, and trunnions in Charis prior to their first use in anger, I'm sure that the new explosives saw testing.

~Tonto

And how many of the testers made it into the field? The grunts on the ground are going to use their black powder standards, regardless of what they are told.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #17
Post by phillies   » Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:43 pm

phillies
Admiral

Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:43 am
Location: Worcester, MA

fallsfromtrees wrote:
Tonto Silerheels wrote:fallsfromtrees wrote:

And none of the individuals in the entire chain of command are members of the inner circle, so they can't query OWL on the proper amounts to use - If they are really using some of the new explosives instead of black powder, yeah, they'll overdo it.

Just as there was testing of the new corned powder, bagged charges, and trunnions in Charis prior to their first use in anger, I'm sure that the new explosives saw testing.

~Tonto

And how many of the testers made it into the field? The grunts on the ground are going to use their black powder standards, regardless of what they are told.


"What is this new stuff? It can't really be as good as black powder, can it? Let's be safe. Choose what you'd use with black powder, and double it."

"We don't get two chances. Double your planned charges."

Readers will perhaps recall the first Hanford breeder reactors. The Chemical Engineer appointed to check all the calculations looked at the safety margins, and substantially increased the size of the piles. He was right, too.
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #17
Post by 6L6   » Tue Jan 27, 2015 12:38 am

6L6
Commander

Posts: 165
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:37 pm
Location: Sourthern Md. USA

phillies, did they increase the amount of material to soak up the neutrons?
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #17
Post by chrisd   » Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:40 am

chrisd
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:38 am
Location: North-East England (70%) and also Thailand (30%)

n7axw wrote:...although experts can occasionally be over rated. :lol:

Don


Consider the etymology of "Expert".

"Ex" as in "former" or "has been"
"Spurt" as in "drip under pressure"

NEVER trust "Experts"
Top
Re: HFQ Official Snippet #17
Post by phillies   » Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:54 am

phillies
Admiral

Posts: 2077
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:43 am
Location: Worcester, MA

6L6 wrote:phillies, did they increase the amount of material to soak up the neutrons?


The size was increased by iirc a third. As a result, they did not lose all power when the expected fission products started poisoning them.
Top

Return to Safehold