Hi Don,
I suspect all the ICA armorers could make the conversions to breech loaders, NTM if the AoG can make conversions in the field, the ICA certainly can.
Regarding the ICN's numbers, we've had no evidence it was hurting that badly, albeit with some crews only doing only limited shore duty at Thesmar [2-4,000?], which given a total of around 200,000 men [1-2%?] before the SoS, mainly from Charis while the bulk of the ICA is from Chisholm, shouldn't affect the ICN so severely.
L
n7axw wrote:Hi Lyonheart,
Your figures are probably more precise than mine. I was simply taking that figure of 300,000 cited in BGV's ruminations and then figuring the Siddarmarkans at 13000 per division as per p. 480 in the dead tree ed... thus coming up with 65000 for the first 5 divisions, 130,000 for the next 10 divisions, bringing that total to 195,000 and then doubling it to bring Siddarmark's total to 390,000 by spring. I see I screwed up the math my first time around on this. At any rate, that would bring the Alliance total to 690,000 men.
Your figures even more strongly reinforce my overall point. The armies of the Alliance are recruiting more people than they can successfully arm and the navy is coming up a bit short. Charis needs to get the navy some reinforcements, probably through recruiting, to deal with this privateering issue they are confronting.
The Alliance still has a quite a few muzzleloading rifles in service. What would you think of developing field conversion kits to convert them over to St Klymans like Maigwair's pet wizzard suggested to him when they were discussing when the St Klyman's were introduced. Bet Housmyn can come up with better kits than the church. That would permit more widespread training in EOC tactics for the RSA.
Don