Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests

Why didn't Merlin kill Zhaspyr Clyntahn?

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Why didn't Merlin kill Zhaspyr Clyntahn?
Post by n7axw   » Mon Feb 22, 2016 10:13 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Randomiser wrote:Keith, I happily grant you all your points in that timeframe. I was more thinking of what could be done at the current point in the story and indulging myself with a little, "wouldn't it be cool if ..." without examining the possible strategic outcomes too closely.

As to TF rifles, Don, we know that they require ammunition of some kind, but beyond that we haven't got a clue. If they turn out to be lasers or plasma rifles, say, the effect might have been rather more than a mystery!


Normally the term rifle implies bullets that are set up by the barrel to spin. But I will concede in advance the useage of terms like plasma rifles in DW's books. Soo...?

At any rate, normal rifles was what I was thinking of.

Don

-
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Why didn't Merlin kill Zhaspyr Clyntahn?
Post by JeffEngel   » Tue Feb 23, 2016 8:17 am

JeffEngel
Admiral

Posts: 2074
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:06 pm

n7axw wrote:Normally the term rifle implies bullets that are set up by the barrel to spin. But I will concede in advance the useage of terms like plasma rifles in DW's books. Soo...?

At any rate, normal rifles was what I was thinking of.

Don

-

"Plasma musket" or "plasma blunderbuss" sound like the weird armaments from the far side of steampunk though.
Top
Re: Why didn't Merlin kill Zhaspyr Clyntahn?
Post by evilauthor   » Tue Feb 23, 2016 1:23 pm

evilauthor
Captain of the List

Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 8:51 pm

IIRC, "rifle" has been used by SF authors for long arm energy weapons almost since personal energy weapons were conceived of.

Basically, in the public mind, "rifle" has become synonymous with any kind of direct fire long arm be they slug throwers or energy weapons. Weber is hardly the first to use "energy rifles" and he's not going to be the last.

Now, for a Safeholdian for whom unrifled muskets were still used in living memory, THEY might question why a long arm energy weapon is called a "rifle" when there's no actual rifling in the weapon, because for them, "rifle" has not yet become synonymous with "long arm".

Which now that I think of it, would probably make for a hilarious scene.
Top
Re: Why didn't Merlin kill Zhaspyr Clyntahn?
Post by saber964   » Tue Feb 23, 2016 8:29 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

Rob Mac F wrote:Good day everyone, very interesting thread. good input.

my two cents are that Merlin doesn't want to kill Clyntahn. the guys is doing such a great job messing with the AOG leadership, just like Hitler did with Nazi Germany. Killing Clyntahn in a spectacular way could reinforce the safeholdian's view of God, and in Langhorn, AND the proscriptions. steam ships aren't going to work against the Gbaba.

Killing the Proscriptions, which, again, Clyntahn is doing a great job writing dispensions, and Charis though innovation, which infects the other nations.

In terms of dealing with Clyntahn, i'd prefer Merlin test that medical unit of his, and do some altering. Let Clyntahn go though his own prison camp as a prisoner, or maybe as a small female child in Harchong, since he and his office has such a hand in keeping Harchong the way it is with serfs and slavery. who knows, maybe he like Erayk Dynnys, he'll attempt to redeem himself.


okay, Safehold joke: the oil lamp burnt out, and the bedardist wants to change it, but the lamp has to really want to change first. :lol:



Clytahn is the biggest help to Charis right now with way he's turning neutrals into belligerent and friends into neutrals and he's doing an absolutely wonderful job of making mortal enemies out of whole populations. He has also given out some truly amazingly stupid orders along the lines of what Hitler did during WWII.
Top
Re: Why didn't Merlin kill Zhaspyr Clyntahn?
Post by n7axw   » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:45 am

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

evilauthor wrote:IIRC, "rifle" has been used by SF authors for long arm energy weapons almost since personal energy weapons were conceived of.

Basically, in the public mind, "rifle" has become synonymous with any kind of direct fire long arm be they slug throwers or energy weapons. Weber is hardly the first to use "energy rifles" and he's not going to be the last.

Now, for a Safeholdian for whom unrifled muskets were still used in living memory, THEY might question why a long arm energy weapon is called a "rifle" when there's no actual rifling in the weapon, because for them, "rifle" has not yet become synonymous with "long arm".

Which now that I think of it, would probably make for a hilarious scene.


I wouldn't deny that the term rifle has had other useage, but the main dictionarry definition is a long gun with spiraled grouves in the barrel to spin the bullet. This is in contrast with shotgun or smooth bore. And in the Safehold series, that is how the term is used.

Don

-
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Why didn't Merlin kill Zhaspyr Clyntahn?
Post by DDHvi   » Thu Feb 25, 2016 9:12 pm

DDHvi
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 365
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:16 pm

Mitchell, Esq. wrote:Clyntahn is useful exactly where he is...

Driving the COGA over a cliff at warp 9, setting the place for a much more reasonable, flexible and less doctrinaire reformation.

The trick is to make sure he drives as hard as he can and does as much damage as he can, but fails in the end.


This fits the plot well also. Remember that Merlin's primary problem is how to get people to think. Hmm, sounds like our current situation :lol:

Seriously, our main problem now seems to be getting people to use reality as the final test, rather than some theory.
:cry:
Douglas Hvistendahl
Retired technical nerd
ddhviste@drtel.net

Dumb mistakes are very irritating.
Smart mistakes go on forever
Unless you test your assumptions!
Top

Return to Safehold