Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Financing the navy

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Financing the navy
Post by Graydon   » Fri Dec 12, 2014 6:34 pm

Graydon
Commander

Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:18 pm

lyonheart wrote:Hi Graydon,

While I'm impressed with several insights in your post, you should review RFC's various posts [and by other posters] on currency, finances, inflation, Silverlode, etc; because your assumptions regarding the Holy Writ setting a standard for all coins, are quite incorrect.



Hi Lyonheart --

Thanks!

the provisions of the Writ which forbid debasing the currency have always been interpreted to mean that while paper notes may be issued by a bank, a nation, an archbishopric, or Mother Church herself, the issuing institution cannot issue notes for more bullion than it has actually on hand.

That's RFC back in LAMA snippet 15's thread. It says what I thought I remembered it saying.

So we may be talking past each other a bit, but, really, the whole of Safehold have a hard gold currency standard set by the Writ and a divine prohibition of fractional reserve banking. That's what that interpretation does.

You might not have to carry the gold, but the only money is gold. This is what resulted in seventeenth and eighteenth and even nineteenth century (pre-telegraph...) bankers having big annual meetings where they paired up bank drafts and letters of credit and such by value across banks and then burned them. The paper that survived to the end of the meeting was what had to be settled up for cash before it went into the fire, too. (It typically wasn't much.)

That the different mints issue different weights and purities reproduces the conditions of the eighteenth century, where everybody prefers to deal by tare (weight) than tally, but this only really introduces annoyance into the book-keeping.

Promissory notes are NOT money. They trade at a discount in their own currency. Money doesn't; money is entirely liquid, that is, the amount to which it is traded doesn't alter its price. (Absent a currency collapse following on from complete failure of government, the 10 dollar bill you buy lunch with has precisely the same 10 dollar value whether you just got it from the mint or it's some scruffy old thing that has been exchanged thousands of times.)

Figuring this out was expensive, historically, and it looks like it's going to be expensive on Safehold, too. (For exactly the same reason; once you've got more economy than gold, you have to do something about your currency problem, but it takes a long time to figure out that currency is an abstraction of the economy, rather than a tangible thing in and of itself. And on Safehold, that's a heresy!)

It doesn't affect the underlying principles at all.

Ducharain's clerks and accountants, every Bishopric and Archbishopric, keep accounts in one currency; there's a conversion step to actual (for gold) or notional (for everything else) Temple marks when tithes are paid, and until very recently the whole planet paid tithes. So in effect Safehold has a single currency of account, though not a single circulating currency.

lyonheart wrote:From LaMA's Snippet 15 [August 13, 2013 page 9], Safehold is closer to your 'soft gold' standard than hard because paper and banknotes etc are issued but its mandated that they're covered by bullion, but that also still depends somewhat on your trust in that bank etc.


That's a hard gold standard being described. A real soft gold standard (like the US before 1933) lets you issue more actual money than you have bullion. That some people cheat, well, that doesn't affect the nature of the currency.

lyonheart wrote:There are also general coin ratio's of 5 copper [bronze actually] to one silver, and 20 silver to one gold mark.


And I failed to remember that; thanks for the reminder. (That's expensive copper.)

lyonheart wrote:Because coins, paper, banknotes and promissory notes are are widely traded, the currency exchange rate changes over 5 years are another fascinating glimpse into RFC's magnum opus.


Only they're not really banknotes. They're gold certificates. This is important, because if they were banknotes, Duchairn could run a deficit. (Promissory notes are like issuing stock that you promise to buy back with interest. They're an investment and capital-raising vehicle but not actual money.)

We see Duchairn selling off Temple property, conscripting labour from those in holy orders, introducing taxation of the historically untaxed Vicarate-class, doing the fiscal equivalent of "kiting a cheque", and forcing purchases of Temple paper on prosperous secular persons. We also see Duchairn get publicly angry with Clyntahn over Siddarmark and Charis because that's where so much tithe money comes from, and now it's just gone.

All of this indicates that Duchairn has to have as much coming in as going out, once whatever reserve money stocks available in the Temple treasuries are taken into account. The fiscal machinery of the modern world just isn't there; Duchairn has to pay in gold eventually.

If banknotes were allowed, Duchairn could deficit finance this war, and be much better off, because Duchairn's main problem (aside from the market perception the Temple is going to lose!) is that expanding the Temple-controlled economy to fight a semi-industrial war against a rising industrial power doesn't work unless you can expand the money supply to match the growth in your economy. Otherwise you've gone and created far more value than you have money, money appreciates in value relative to everything else (=deflation), and your economy kind of strangles.

To expand properly, you need money that's independent of the rate of gold mining (or to be incredibly lucky about your available mines...) and you need some kind of sufficient control mechanism (which strongly implies a market of some kind) to give you enough information to let you know how much money to add. Which in turn means you need the safe rate of interest, and you can't have that without the fractional reserve banking because "safe rate of interest" is set by how many people default on their loans. If you're not counting that stuff -- if there isn't any way to have something to count -- you can't do it.

Duchairn's further handicapped by the Inquisition, which is distorting the financial markets by practicing widespread extortion ("pay or we hurt you" being classic extortion.) So a hard problem is probably impossible.

I personally suspect recognition that the problem is impossible and letting everything go as long as possible will mean lots and lots of people starve as Mother Church's finances collapse is what's going to make Duchairn snap.

Mikhail Staynair might be quietly stacking up gold in the vaults of the Church of Charis against the day he needs to send shiploads of bullion to the mainland to stave off that starvation, too. If you want consider a scenario that has various Vicars we don't like dead of apoplexy....
Top
Re: Financing the navy
Post by PeterZ   » Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:28 pm

PeterZ
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 6432
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:11 pm
Location: Colorado

Graydon wrote:snip

lyonheart wrote:From LaMA's Snippet 15 [August 13, 2013 page 9], Safehold is closer to your 'soft gold' standard than hard because paper and banknotes etc are issued but its mandated that they're covered by bullion, but that also still depends somewhat on your trust in that bank etc.


That's a hard gold standard being described. A real soft gold standard (like the US before 1933) lets you issue more actual money than you have bullion. That some people cheat, well, that doesn't affect the nature of the currency.

snip.


The promissory notes will tend to create a "softer" gold standard. They become another means of storing wealth. One might argue that they become a more attractive means of storing wealth because they pay interest. Currency functions as both a wealth storing mechanism and wealth transfer mechanism. The promissory notes won't be as good a means of transferring wealth but they are extremely good at storing it. While the notes aren't currency, they do replace portions of the currency pool that is used to store wealth rather than transfer wealth.

As the amount promissory notes increase the effective currency increases as less of the actual Marks in circulation are being used to store wealth. Instead they are being used to transfer it through facilitating economic transactions. Decreasing the denominations of these notes over time increases their utility as a means of wealth transfer.

Regarding fractional reserve banking, there is nothing in text that suggests it is prohibited. A bank can lend its total cash/gold hoard if it so chooses. Aamof, text of Duchairn's latest fiscal demands suggest that the CoGA can force individual and businesses to lend until they become insolvent. A bank can keep some of its gold in reserve if it so chooses. If a bank is repaid with borrowed funds in honest weight currency, no text suggests that some or all of those funds cannot be lent out again. Prudence suggests keeping some of a bank's liquid assets as a reserve against defaults.

I don't see anything that states fractional lending is impermissible.
Top
Re: Financing the navy
Post by Draken   » Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:21 pm

Draken
Commander

Posts: 199
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:58 pm

There is a lot of possible tricks to do with money, we would have higher income for short time, after that inflation will skyrocket and it will fall apart, also CoGA could try shaving every nonessential expenses and it should add a lot of cash to their treasury.
Top
Re: Financing the navy
Post by Graydon   » Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:52 pm

Graydon
Commander

Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:18 pm

PeterZ wrote:
Graydon wrote:That's a hard gold standard being described. A real soft gold standard (like the US before 1933) lets you issue more actual money than you have bullion. That some people cheat, well, that doesn't affect the nature of the currency.


The promissory notes will tend to create a "softer" gold standard. They become another means of storing wealth. One might argue that they become a more attractive means of storing wealth because they pay interest.


That kind of promissory note is almost exactly like buying stock that pays a one-time dividend.

PeterZ wrote:Currency functions as both a wealth storing mechanism and wealth transfer mechanism. The promissory notes won't be as good a means of transferring wealth but they are extremely good at storing it. While the notes aren't currency, they do replace portions of the currency pool that is used to store wealth rather than transfer wealth.


Only if you've got comparable access to the courts. If you're a middle-class artisan and the issuer is an Archbishop, a King, or, heaven help you, Holy Mother Church, you're not going to be able to much if the repayment isn't for the full agreed value. Pretty much everything we've seen suggests the only places on Safehold where a cobbler can even hope to sue a Duke are Charis and Chisholm. (And probably Siddarmark, if they had dukes.) That's incredibly important; there's a good bit of evidence that Hong Kong and Singapore took off as commercial centres not on volume of trade (lots of places had that) but because someone was enforcing commercial law evenly there.

[snip]

PeterZ wrote:I don't see anything that states fractional lending is impermissible.


Fractional reserve banking is where you make loans greatly in excess of your cash reserves. The cash reserves are sized to cover your expected rate of loan defaults, not the size of the loans. The bank is creating money out of nothing. (Which, in a growing economy, turns out to be the right thing to do.) The interpretation of the Writ RFC gives forbids this; you have to have gold to cover the full value of all your loans.

This is going to have to give at some point, if Safehold is going to generally industrialize.
Top
Re: Financing the navy
Post by PeterZ   » Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:47 pm

PeterZ
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 6432
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:11 pm
Location: Colorado

Graydon,

If the bank doesn't lend depositors' money, it doesn't matter how much of its cash it lends. If it lends deposits, then lending limits become important. Also, if it lends deposits, it must keep sufficient equity to cover losses unless it wishes to share risk with depositors.

The House of Qwentyn can lend all its wealth just as it did after the SoS. It can accept borrowed gold as payment and lend it out again. Those borrowed funds can be lent out again and again. Effectively this process also creates money. The amount created depends on how often a single gold piece is lent out. No one on Safehold could envision money being relent often enough to become a problem.

Bottom line is that text supports the idea of individuals having no limits on how much of its wealth he/shecan lend. That means the theory of fractional reserve banking is possible on Safehold. The velocity of money magnifies money creation and leveraging deposits can increase the velocity of money under the right conditions. Increased deposits might make the Inquisition take notice, as it stand the concept is not on their radar.
Top
Re: Financing the navy
Post by TN4994   » Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:08 pm

TN4994
Captain of the List

Posts: 404
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 3:41 pm
Location: Apache County Arizona

Heck with coins, notes, and silver certificates.
I vote for eight inch pepperoni pizza as the base level benchmark.

Pizzas of eight on every plate. :mrgreen:

Sorry fo the insane interruption.
Back to the serious discussion.
Top
Re: Financing the navy
Post by n7axw   » Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:38 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

TN4994 wrote:Heck with coins, notes, and silver certificates.
I vote for eight inch pepperoni pizza as the base level benchmark.

Pizzas of eight on every plate. :mrgreen:

Sorry fo the insane interruption.
Back to the serious discussion.


Make mine a medium meat lovers with a silver bullet!

As much as I appreciate how well informed theese discussions can be, it occasionally does get a bit deep...

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Financing the navy
Post by TN4994   » Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:37 pm

TN4994
Captain of the List

Posts: 404
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 3:41 pm
Location: Apache County Arizona

n7axw wrote:
TN4994 wrote:Heck with coins, notes, and silver certificates.
I vote for eight inch pepperoni pizza as the base level benchmark.

Pizzas of eight on every plate. :mrgreen:

Sorry fo the insane interruption.
Back to the serious discussion.


Make mine a medium meat lovers with a silver bullet!

As much as I appreciate how well informed theese discussions can be, it occasionally does get a bit deep...

Don

Are you:
A) Werewolf Hunter
B) Vampire Stalker
C) Souvenir Collector
D) Mask man on White Horse

If B, I recommend a modified silver encased Judas Tree Tipped fitted to the caliber of your choice. Abraham Van Helsing IV had a few boxes for sale on E-Bay. 44 mag.
Top
Re: Financing the navy
Post by Graydon   » Sat Dec 13, 2014 12:18 am

Graydon
Commander

Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:18 pm

PeterZ wrote:The House of Qwentyn can lend all its wealth just as it did after the SoS. It can accept borrowed gold as payment and lend it out again. Those borrowed funds can be lent out again and again.


That quote from RFC

the provisions of the Writ which forbid debasing the currency have always been interpreted to mean that while paper notes may be issued by a bank, a nation, an archbishopric, or Mother Church herself, the issuing institution cannot issue notes for more bullion than it has actually on hand.

So if I come home from a busy and eventful few years with Charisian privateers and take my nice stack of pay and profits, all 5,000 marks of it, handily in gold, and deposit it with a bank for safekeeping -- I'm going to do something boring ashore, privateering involves way too many cannon and far too much screaming in terror -- how much have I increased that bank's loan capital?

As I understand the above, 5,000 marks. The bank can issue notes for up to the 5,000 marks I've just deposited.

If the bank loans my deposit as gold, it obviously can't loan more than the 5,000 marks. The bank equally obviously can't issue notes against the gold it has loaned out; that gold isn't "on hand", safely in the vault. If people come back and re-deposit their loans in gold as gold, the bank still never gets above 5,000 marks in gold from my deposit.

The bank can't receive notes and issue loans backed by those notes. The only way to issue notes is to have gold on hand, and notes aren't gold. (Or, rather, they represent gold, but they're only allowed to do it once, and they already have.)

In a proper fractional reserve system, the restriction on notes being backed by gold on hand wouldn't be there. The bank could issue notes against the value of deposited notes, because the system doesn't care what the material representation of the money happens to be. (It has better not; most of our money is electrons.)

In such a system, a reserve requirement of 20% (Baron Ironhill is a cautious man, but not too cautious) that 5,000 mark deposit can create another 20,000 marks worth of "bank money" in the form of loans by cycling through depositing and being-re-issued up to 80% of the deposit value. (I'll be forgiven if I don't try to exhume some very dusty math skills and sum the series?)

All 20,000 created marks go away as the loans are paid off, but the interest paid to the bank doesn't, that's the money that expands the economy.

Only on Safehold that's a heresy; Holy Writ says you can only issue notes for gold that's in your vault. Even Father Paitr would be upset with you. (And Baron Ironhill. And the bank. Though probably not in a way that involves dying horribly. Just lots and lots of penance.)

While a bank can't use deposited notes as the basis to issue more notes, while, more specifically, you're required to have bullion on hand as the basis of your bank notes, you can't have fractional reserve banking. Your money supply is fundamentally limited by your stock of whatever the backing substance is. (In this case gold. Lots of things have been used.) This keeps money from turning into the abstraction of economic activity you really want when industrializing.
Top
Re: Financing the navy
Post by SYED   » Sat Dec 13, 2014 12:54 am

SYED
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:03 pm

what would happen i the location and amount of gold they have in every part of the church was revealed? Knowing their gold reserves have been so depleated would cause concern.
i kind of like to see the church get robbed, but it would be very tricky
Top

Return to Safehold