Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by KNick » Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:49 pm | |
KNick
Posts: 2142
|
We know that Safehold does have printed fiction books. Both Duke Trian's and Narhmanh's libraries contained such works. And both were fairly large. If fiction is being printed, there is a market for it. If there is a market, more will be written. Along with newspapers, broadsheets and religious works, it seems to me that there is already a large demand for cheaper paper. Also, if there is that much printing being done, I would imagine that someone has already come up with a (leg) muscle powered printing press, much like a sewing machine.
_
Try to take a fisherman's fish and you will be tomorrows bait!!! |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Tue Apr 22, 2014 7:19 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
You are probably right generally. But there were some exceptions. Think about the abbot's library in his office at the St. Zherneau's. What Merlin describes as he is ushered in is a room with pretty tall walls stacked with books. So once you have the printing press the way to large collections of books is open, although probably not as large as we would be thinking by modern standards. But still, even prior to the printing press, monasteries commonly reprinted manuscripts for library use. IIRC the way it was done would be to gather a dozen or so brothers in a room where someone would read off the manuscripts while each of the others would take dictation. Eventually you can get at least some quantity of manuscripts that way. In my first parish as a pastor, I was more or less chief cook and bottle washer and I would do bulletins, newsletters, etc. I had this wonderful phenomenon known as a hand cranked spirit life duplicator. Once I had my stencil it didn't take long to run off 50-75 copies...say about 5 minutes unless I managed to jam up the works. Later they got me a AB Dick 525 that run on power. That would really run off stuff. I forget how fast, but my 100 copies couldn't have taken more than a couple of minutes to run off. My point is that libraries with considerable quantity were not only possible, but increasingly common after Guttenberg. At first they were kept in churches and universities. But then as time went on, libraries would be endowed by nobles in their communities, perhaps not on a check out a book basis the way we understand it, but certainly available to be borrowed and read, even if only on the premises of the library itself. To speculate about Safehold, I suspect that Father Zhon wasn't all that uncommon. The COGA was providing five years of education to everyone which implies very basic literacy. Also, the impulse to educate its clergy would have inevitably led to collections of books any place a seminary was endowed. Then, given human nature, it is not unreasonable to assume that a certain percentage of nobles would have been collecting books. By modern standards it would look lean, but I would be very surprised were they not as far along as early 16th century Europe. Don When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by saber964 » Tue Apr 22, 2014 8:46 pm | |
saber964
Posts: 2423
|
You could ask those individuals with large personal libraries like Duke Tirain to donate extra copies or damaged books to make public libaries
|
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by SWM » Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:35 pm | |
SWM
Posts: 5928
|
No, not quite. Each brother in the scripting room would be have a copy of some text that he was copying from. Generally each one would be copying a different text. While they did that, another brother would usually be reading aloud from the Bible, turning the effort into a form of worship.
Actually, I quite agree with you--Safehold is probably comparable to the 16th century or even later with regards to the quantity and distribution of books. But I think you overestimate how many books there were at that time. --------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by AirTech » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:09 am | |
AirTech
Posts: 476
|
A non lending technical library may be of some use too. Have Owl run off copies of a set twentieth century reference works (CRC Press publications spring to mind) and make them available in major centers, you can skip the copyright data, 1500 years should cover expiry. Starting with the earliest editions and then bleeding the later versions out to obscure the origins. Think of it as an outer circle, information available to people not cleared for detailed knowledge. |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by SYED » Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:31 am | |
SYED
Posts: 1345
|
They have those bugs, simply have them access the libraries of the world and copy each book. OWL could then produce copies.
There could be a library in charis, chrishom, emerald and corisande, as each place has royalty in the know of their origin. THe full collection is dived amongst the different libraries. THen the libraries themselves get each book in their collection copied, so every library get their own copy of the book. It might take time, but that every library gets a full collection. THE church could creat a library for all the books that come under their purview, and distribute them. The same for the schools. THe public libraries would contain a great deal of the fiction books. At first none of the books can be removed from the building but eventually they can be loaned out. I can see some of the more academic church orders, creating the library system, they have plenty of money available. |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by Weird Harold » Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:39 am | |
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
Doesn't Lat/Long navigation require significant computation? Merlin had to introduce Arabic Numerals and decimal numbering/math as a prerequisite to many of his desire changes. It could be that Chronometers weren't widely used because the math required using Roman Numerals wasn't worth the effort? .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by jgnfld » Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:25 am | |
jgnfld
Posts: 468
|
Very astute point I should have thought of.
Answer re. calculations is: "Partially." And probably to the point that no one bothers as dead reckoning should work quite well on Safehold given the trade routes and their geography. Determining latitude and longitude from a noon sight of the sun and an accurate chronometer doesn't require much math nor Arabic numerals for a gross answer correct to say less than +/-20 nautical miles E/W or even better--Safehold's eccentricity values are not published that I know! [NOTE: This ASSUMES there was a Ptolemy or Babylonian who had worked out Safehold's equation of time and that these tables were available, or that Hastings did this for them and published it somewhere.] It can be done, since Ptolemy did and published his calculations. But it's a lot of work over many decades and I'd think we would have heard about it and the operation behind it. Celestial navigation would be orders of magnitude worse a problem. Lots more tables would be needed as well and this probably makes Arabic numerals a near necessity. --- added: When I say dead reckoning, I mean keeping track of courses steered (compass) and speed (log + sandglass) and maybe even an astrolabe together with sightings of navigational features and other more subtle cues like swell, bottom material, birds, etc. Dead reckoning has as unwarranted bad reputation in our more quantitative age.
|
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by Tenshinai » Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:52 am | |
Tenshinai
Posts: 2893
|
Not really.
Math with Roman numerals isn´t a problem, doing math FAST by hand with Roman numerals, now that´s where it gets tricky, because of how you may need to write up to 4 times as many numbers. |
Top |
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war | |
---|---|
by Whingnut » Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:32 am | |
Whingnut
Posts: 6
|
To calculate the longitude of a sailing ship using a chronometer you need to know three things. 1-When it is noon at your reference location. This is determine through the use of a chronometer. A chronometer is a very accurate and precise time keeping device. It needs to be able to keep time to with in minutes and seconds of the time at the reference location.(surprise this is one of the reason that long and latitude are broken up into degree.minute.second increments) To design a time keeping device accurate and precise enough to afford good sailing there are a number of additional things to consider. A pendulum clock would not work on a sailing ship as the pendulum would be thrown off by the rocking of the ship. So a spring must be used. However not just any spring is acceptable. Materials will stretch and shrink based on their temperature. So a simple spring used at the cold pole would have a different tension then the same spring used at a equator. This can be corrected by using bimetallic element (two dissimilar elements "welded" together) to provide a type of feedback that moves a counter weight in or out from a fixed point to compensate for temperature change. Another point to take into account is that the tension in your spring lessens as the spring unwinds, it will therefore need some mechanism to compensate for this as well. And finally there needs to be some mechanism to provide "power" while the chronometer is being wound. A modern day mechanical chronometer may lose 0.1 second a day due to friction and other losses. 2-when it is Noon at your current location. Thankfully this is relatively easy. The use of a sextant will give you a reasonable indication when the sun is at its highest and therefor noon can be determined. 3- Geometry and trigonometry. The understanding that there are is a relationship between angles and location on a circle. With this if you know that the sun takes one day (26.516 hours Safehold time) to travel all the way around a circle of 360 degrees the. You can find the angle away from your reference point. Taken all together if you know that the time in Telesberg is 0658 and it is 1200 at your current location then you are 5 hours and 2 minutes west (assume east to west rotation) of Telesberg. This means that you are 360 degrees/26.516 hours *5.03 hours = 68.29 degrees west of Telesberg. (I think my math is close) it is stated that using this method you can get within plus or minus 10 nautical miles of your actual location. If you know the location of a second astronomical body in relation to your sun you can get an accuracy of 1 nautical mile. Whingnut
Just another loose knut behind the wheel |
Top |