Hi PeterZ,
Rivers and canals will definitely influence the land war in major ways.
We have had no river course data on the big maps when these have often been delineated on even political maps of earth because of their importance.
It's been why I've said the storyline is focused on the seas and oceans.
I thought some physical reason why the canal wasn't available was acceptable, but given its importance in bypassing the time shipping around Howard it should have come up sooner, even if just mentioned in passing.
The ironclad galleys should have displacements of at least a few hundred tons if they're the same size as the coastal or "Mediterranean" galleys RFC has mentioned in OAR and BSRA, as opposed to the larger Charisian galleys that were designed more for sailing the seas, not rowing.
If they're smaller than those, that could be interesting as well, but the armor needed to protect the rowers could be quite thin if their so small, So I doubt they're really intended to go in harm's way against real warships; rather they are to raid Charisian shipping in Silkian ports in the Gulf of Mathyas, or Siddarmark.
How quickly they appear in MTaT will be very interesting indeed.
I suspect they will learn real sailing warships with explosive shells are much more dangerous, and attempt to avoid them, and I wonder if even a pair of schooners might best one.
I can see Clyntahn ordering them to attack the ICN anchorage in Tarot, but losing the whole kit and caboodle trying to carry out his stupid orders.
A canal spanning the isthmus is so obvious, I think all who expected one should pat themselves on the back for being right.
L
PeterZ wrote:Sorry Lyonheart, but I think with holding the canal data was more important than simply providing us with more goodies to speculate over. You know those canals will dictate the overall strategy of a land war. Heck, they have been one of the key elements of Dohlar's success in developing a more modern navy.
If we had a map of the canals or even key canals, the startegy against Siddermark will be obvious. Any surprises he has planned for us will may very well appear contrived as a consequence. Heaven forbid such a turn of events!
RFC did post that the Silkiah canal is too small for current ocean going galleons. If only small galleys could fit, a 2,000 ton frigate is out of the question and a 6,000 ton protected cruiser is truly out of the question regardless of draft. Bummer! I thought I was right on this one.
runsforcelery wrote:[Obviously, the Church isn't going to worry about demilitarization of canals at this point, but blue-water galleons aren't going to fit through it too well. The older canals have smaller locks than more recent ones, and this is quite an old one . . . which is why I made the point in an earlierpost that they might beable to get small galleys through it.
All of this does suggest that Charis will have to start developing their network of coaling stations/colonies. The question that comes to mind is who will they use to populate those colonies? The Harchong slave POWs? Siddermarkian refugees? Disaffected Imperial Charisian citizens?
Whoever, the colonies have to get started soon if Gwyllym and King Haarald's name sakes are to be used by Safehold #7. So, where will MTaT show the first colony being started? I have my suspicions but would prefer to hear others first.
Anyone?
lyonheart wrote:Hello PeterZ,
Thanks for your kind response.
I've always presumed there were many canals on Haven and Howard, just that we've had no detailed map or textev confirmation other than passing references.
However one of my points was that why didn't we hear about the Silkiah canal earlier, such as in OAR?
Such a canal would have dramatically affected trade enough to be at least mentioned, and given how much smaller ships crossed the Atlantic with Columbus, the maximum possible size ships to use the Silkian canal would have been a cap on ship size for decades if not centuries, and probably mentioned in the background, yes?
Especially since I think most if not all of Dohlar's galleys could have fitted through the 20' draft cited for the canal, not to mention its width; and even if they could have done it fully laded as I expect, it would have been very easy for them to unload almost everything onto a barge they or somebody towed behind them through the canal to be sure they could use the canal, then reloaded once they reached the Gulf of Mathyas, then on to Tarot, very quickly etc.
Only there's not a hint of anything close to that even suggested, may I ask why?
Now its quite possible the canal was down for renovation or repair (and everybody in OAR knew it except us the readers); no mention yet of any locks that might need repair, but there could also have been a a landslide or slump that collapsed part of the canal, or an earthquake that ruined some locks etc, or a mud volcano that blocked an entrance, but given its importance, it should have received some mention in passing why they were going around Howard when they might have taken a short cut if the canal had been up.
All this time we've been discussing, sometimes strongly whether there was any isthmian canal; and apparently there always has been, not quite where it seemed most likely, but there nonetheless, so any hint would have been very much appreciated.
I realize RFC needs to keep his creative options open, and I very much sympathize, still some cards may have been held too close.
The Silkiah canal would be at least twice as long as the suggested Jahras canal, and thus be subject to tidal effects, which could effect its utility if all traffic were grounded once or twice a day, which could also affect what kind of ships could use it unless they were put into dry-dock type cradles on a known schedule along the canal.
While Silkiah has some independence despite being a tributary of Desnar, how it has been able to skirt the embargo without a large army of its own is worth some further explanation, hopefully in MTaT.
The proximity of Desnar to the canal might also be a factor of international interest, but given the temple's overriding power, the Silkian's interests have been ignored until now, but that could change dramatically by #7.
Protected and Armored cruisers could very well appear in #7 as the obvious force multipliers you suggest, while the ironclads actually see action; since the first steam engine will finally appear in MTaT, it will be awhile before the production can supply the ironclads, as I strongly doubt they are first in line.
If the ironclads aren't used to take and open the canal to the EoC in #7 etc, I will be surprised.
L