Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests

Charis's spy problem.

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Charis's spy problem.
Post by Keith_w   » Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:53 am

Keith_w
Commodore

Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:10 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Brigade XO wrote:Having The Church's intelegence services dig out some kind of "spy" or at least criminal network selling information surely would divert some of it's attention. That would be rather tough on the people caught but you are not going to deliberatly expose them even if you would perhaps never want to work with them again once the the war with the Church is over except to keep an eye on them for other possible criminal activity. Really iffy line between "our spies" their spies, their people who are spying (and know it) for us and people who are in it for either just the money or any one of a dozen reasons.


Charis, and more specifically Merlin, don't work that way. They would never deliberately send someone into harms way expecting and hoping that they would be captured and tortured.
--
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
Top
Re: Charis's spy problem.
Post by Keith_w   » Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:55 am

Keith_w
Commodore

Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:10 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

AirTech wrote:The advantage of a publicly known spy network is that it can provide a cover for unknown sources.


They have a publicly known network, it's the seijin network.
--
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
Top
Re: Charis's spy problem.
Post by PalmerSperry   » Mon Mar 21, 2016 4:02 pm

PalmerSperry
Commander

Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:25 pm

Keith_w wrote:
AirTech wrote:The advantage of a publicly known spy network is that it can provide a cover for unknown sources.


They have a publicly known network, it's the seijin network.


I can't believe that Charis didn't have a spy network prior to Merlin "waking up", and I further find it hard to believe all of the network they did have disappeared. Though doubtless some of them will have come down on the Temple Loyalist front and no longer be talking to Charis, whilst others will either have died or been moved to areas where they are now less productive, or no longer able to communicate with their handlers.
Top
Re: Charis's spy problem.
Post by Hildum   » Wed May 25, 2016 2:32 pm

Hildum
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:15 pm

You are all forgetting that Charis did have a global spy network in place before Merlin in addition to the information collected by its merchant fleet. That network has certainly been continued, even though it is no longer necessary. However, I suspect the ability to make reports has been limited by the trade disruptions.
Top
Re: Charis's spy problem.
Post by DDHv   » Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:53 pm

DDHv
Captain of the List

Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 5:59 pm

Hildum wrote:You are all forgetting that Charis did have a global spy network in place before Merlin in addition to the information collected by its merchant fleet. That network has certainly been continued, even though it is no longer necessary. However, I suspect the ability to make reports has been limited by the trade disruptions.


Continuing the global spy network would make sense for the same reason that some (less critical) reports have deliberate errors in them. In all contests, it can be important to fake out the opponent. In WWII, didn't they cause a corpse carrying disinformation to reach the NAZIs
:?: :!:
Douglas Hvistendahl
Retired technical nerd

Dumb mistakes are very irritating.
Smart mistakes go on forever
Unless you test your assumptions!
Top
Re: Charis's spy problem.
Post by Keith_w   » Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:34 pm

Keith_w
Commodore

Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:10 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

DDHv wrote:
Hildum wrote:You are all forgetting that Charis did have a global spy network in place before Merlin in addition to the information collected by its merchant fleet. That network has certainly been continued, even though it is no longer necessary. However, I suspect the ability to make reports has been limited by the trade disruptions.


Continuing the global spy network would make sense for the same reason that some (less critical) reports have deliberate errors in them. In all contests, it can be important to fake out the opponent. In WWII, didn't they cause a corpse carrying disinformation to reach the NAZIs
:?: :!:


Yes, launched him from a submarine of the Spanish coast.
--
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
Top
Re: Charis's spy problem.
Post by AirTech   » Sat Jun 04, 2016 7:31 am

AirTech
Captain of the List

Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:37 am
Location: Deeeep South (Australia) (most of the time...)

DDHv wrote:
Hildum wrote:You are all forgetting that Charis did have a global spy network in place before Merlin in addition to the information collected by its merchant fleet. That network has certainly been continued, even though it is no longer necessary. However, I suspect the ability to make reports has been limited by the trade disruptions.


Continuing the global spy network would make sense for the same reason that some (less critical) reports have deliberate errors in them. In all contests, it can be important to fake out the opponent. In WWII, didn't they cause a corpse carrying disinformation to reach the NAZIs
:?: :!:


If you are being really nasty, you could frame up a member of the other side as an active source (retribution can be a bitch). If you pick the right patsy this could be really destabilizing. The drones could do a better job than any human agent at this.
Top
Re: Charis's spy problem.
Post by evilauthor   » Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:45 am

evilauthor
Captain of the List

Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 8:51 pm

Hildum wrote:You are all forgetting that Charis did have a global spy network in place before Merlin in addition to the information collected by its merchant fleet. That network has certainly been continued, even though it is no longer necessary. However, I suspect the ability to make reports has been limited by the trade disruptions.


They had a spy network, but I'd hardly call it "global". What they had was likely focused on their then-current enemies and other associates, aka, the Out Island kingdoms.

Seriously, the only one of these Out Island powers who might be said to have a truly "global" intelligence network is Hektor of Corrisande. And he only gets a "might" because he put sleeper agents inside the Inquisition!
Top
Re: Charis's spy problem.
Post by saber964   » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:12 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

evilauthor wrote:
Hildum wrote:You are all forgetting that Charis did have a global spy network in place before Merlin in addition to the information collected by its merchant fleet. That network has certainly been continued, even though it is no longer necessary. However, I suspect the ability to make reports has been limited by the trade disruptions.


They had a spy network, but I'd hardly call it "global". What they had was likely focused on their then-current enemies and other associates, aka, the Out Island kingdoms.

Seriously, the only one of these Out Island powers who might be said to have a truly "global" intelligence network is Hektor of Corrisande. And he only gets a "might" because he put sleeper agents inside the Inquisition!



Chrais's spy network was more of a commercial spy network than a military one. That's not to say that there trade representatives didn't report on military matters. Also IIRC most of Charis' merchant ships had ex-navy officers or officers on "sabbatical" like ADM Sarforth when he was younger. Do you think Sarforth wasn't reporting on what happened in Siddar City or Port Harbor or etc.

FYI the maritime insurance company Lloyds of London used to have one of the best nongovernmental intelligence arms in the world. It was made up of primary and secondary agents and sub-agents in most of the world's ports that inspected ships and reported on the comings and goings of ships around the world.
Top
Re: Charis's spy problem.
Post by Hildum   » Thu Jun 16, 2016 7:08 pm

Hildum
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:15 pm

AirTech wrote:
DDHv wrote:Continuing the global spy network would make sense for the same reason that some (less critical) reports have deliberate errors in them. In all contests, it can be important to fake out the opponent. In WWII, didn't they cause a corpse carrying disinformation to reach the NAZIs
:?: :!:


If you are being really nasty, you could frame up a member of the other side as an active source (retribution can be a bitch). If you pick the right patsy this could be really destabilizing. The drones could do a better job than any human agent at this.


Already been done, without the need for fancy technology. Amazing what a "slip" of the tongue can accomplish at the right time. See Off Armageddon Reef.
Top

Return to Safehold