Weird Harold wrote:You haven't looked at Steam Plows, have you? They don't tow plowshares, they work in pairs to winch the plows back and forth. They plow ten to twenty times as fast as a team of mules or horses. When they change position, the only thing moving is the steam engines on the hard packed ground at the edges of the fields.
I have repeatedly used steam plow and steam tractor interchangeably as that was what you inferred earlier, if you meant cable plows
only, then you should have figured that out when i specifically mentioned those previously.
And as i noted then, cable plows were mostly popular in England and Germany, but never a big hit in USA due to larger fields and terrain.
You´re talking about this style:
http://www.leedsengine.info/leeds/photo ... inting.jpgWhile i was talking about this:
http://www.smokstak.com/gallery/files/3 ... estler.jpgFor a cable plow, yes there´s less need for mobility, it is also drastically less capable(which means you´re paying maybe 70-80% as much for something that can do maybe 10-30% of the work a steam tractor can do), cannot handle uneven terrain or large fields very well.
Which means that ALL the extra work needed(as i quoted earlier) to be done will have to be done completely by additional horses/oxen etc..
And all those extra animals still need to be fed for the whole year. This is part of the reason why cable plows lost popularity even faster than steam tractors.
It´s bloody damned expensive to make useful.
And why they never really got popular at all outside of areas with small fields on flat terrain with plenty of road access.
Weird Harold wrote:Steam cranes and steam shovels can move on tracks
That was pretty much my point yes. For the purpose of power needed, running on railroad tracks is easy.
or they can move on crawler tracks or huge wheels like steam traction engines.
Very slowly.