PeterZ wrote:Related question:
Why is Aivah so vehemently more vocal against Rayno relative to Clyntahn? If she believes Rayno is the driver of Clyntahn's policies, killing him will tend to erode the effectiveness of those policies. If he is a moderating influence why the repeated vitriol?
Shakespeare had it right perhaps even on Safehold...does the lady protest too much?
Condemning Clyntahn is a bit like reminding people water is wet. He's a bad, bad, BAD man. There's no need to go on. Just report what he does and it's all on the table in grotesque detail.
Rayno, by contrast, is a shadowy operator behind the Grand Fornicator. Being in control of himself and generally rational leads people to like the slimy worm. Hammering away at how he's the technocrat of genocide and political terror is a necessary reminder.
Without Rayno - and assuming no one stepped up to be the replacement Rayno - Clyntahn would get more people killed faster for less strategic benefit. That's not a particularly clear win, but it's nothing to make Rayno look good, or to obviate the need to remember that Rayno is the one making terror and blackmail work more efficiently.
A Rayno replacement would probably be less effective in many ways, else very likely that replacement would already be doing that job. But they'd also be a fresh look at the Temple's counter-espionage routine. Helm Cleaver is well-situated in the current regime, and a less competent overall fresh look may make for fewer opportunities and more risks during a critical period.