Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

Considerations about naval designs

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Considerations about naval designs
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Sun Dec 14, 2014 10:09 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

n7axw wrote:Re-read the text in HFAF, especially that conversation between Father Paityr and Howsmyn. In addition, it was discussed by Cayleb, Sharleyan and Merlin as being wwaayy beyond the proscriptions...

Don

Only if you go by the intent of Langhorne. It can obviously be approved if looked at the proper way. Who you gonna pay attention to - a rational sane Paityr or a megalomaniac toon like Langhorne :mrgreen:
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: Considerations about naval designs
Post by n7axw   » Sun Dec 14, 2014 10:14 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

fallsfromtrees wrote:
n7axw wrote:Re-read the text in HFAF, especially that conversation between Father Paityr and Howsmyn. In addition, it was discussed by Cayleb, Sharleyan and Merlin as being wwaayy beyond the proscriptions...

Don

Only if you go by the intent of Langhorne. It can obviously be approved if looked at the proper way. Who you gonna pay attention to - a rational sane Paityr or a megalomaniac toon like Langhorne :mrgreen:


Oh, I completely agree... My only point is that diesil can be approved by the same sort of rationality.... 8-)

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Considerations about naval designs
Post by BarryKirk   » Sun Dec 14, 2014 10:29 pm

BarryKirk
Captain of the List

Posts: 407
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: York, PA

The Delthak and other steam ships had ventilation blowers. It was never discussed how they were powered.
Top
Re: Considerations about naval designs
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Sun Dec 14, 2014 10:33 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

BarryKirk wrote:The Delthak and other steam ships had ventilation blowers. It was never discussed how they were powered.

You're right. I suspect handwavium fan blades powered by the rakurai of Langhorne.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: Considerations about naval designs
Post by n7axw   » Mon Dec 15, 2014 3:00 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

fallsfromtrees wrote:
BarryKirk wrote:The Delthak and other steam ships had ventilation blowers. It was never discussed how they were powered.

You're right. I suspect handwavium fan blades powered by the rakurai of Langhorne.


Why would we believe that they were powered by anything other than steam? Turbines perhaps rather than piston stroke engines...but steam.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Considerations about naval designs
Post by Tonto Silerheels   » Mon Dec 15, 2014 3:22 pm

Tonto Silerheels
Captain of the List

Posts: 454
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:01 pm

n7axw wrote:

Why would we believe that they were powered by anything other than steam?

Compressed air?

~Tonto
Top
Re: Considerations about naval designs
Post by n7axw   » Mon Dec 15, 2014 3:40 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Tonto Silerheels wrote:n7axw wrote:

Why would we believe that they were powered by anything other than steam?

Compressed air?

~Tonto


That works, although I'm pretty sure that the steam would do the compressing.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Considerations about naval designs
Post by Draken   » Mon Dec 15, 2014 7:11 pm

Draken
Commander

Posts: 199
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:58 pm

What about torpedoes they quite dangerous weapon which doesn't need very advanced technology. If I'm correct Charis could produce pretty nice torpedoes right now, they would be great for sneaky attack in the night, nobody will know that he was attacked before detonation of torpedo.
Other nice thing would be ship similar to USS Wasp, big ship designed to support landing operation of army, they won't have any planes for quite long time so landing deck would be useless, but mortars and howitzers instead of it would be really nice. I'm talking about big calibers 200+ mm, but I'm not thinking about extreme caliber like 800+ mm. I'm thinking about guns heavy enough to destroy any kind of fortification, but light enough to shoot fast.
Top
Re: Considerations about naval designs
Post by n7axw   » Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:52 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Draken wrote:What about torpedoes they quite dangerous weapon which doesn't need very advanced technology. If I'm correct Charis could produce pretty nice torpedoes right now, they would be great for sneaky attack in the night, nobody will know that he was attacked before detonation of torpedo.
Other nice thing would be ship similar to USS Wasp, big ship designed to support landing operation of army, they won't have any planes for quite long time so landing deck would be useless, but mortars and howitzers instead of it would be really nice. I'm talking about big calibers 200+ mm, but I'm not thinking about extreme caliber like 800+ mm. I'm thinking about guns heavy enough to destroy any kind of fortification, but light enough to shoot fast.


Hi Draken,

This has been mentioned before and what it seems to keep coming back to is that given Charis' absolute naval supremacy at the moment, torpedoes such as you describe would be a lot more useful to the bad guys than to Charis. You are right that Charis could develop them, but no point in giving other people ideas of how they might hurt you...

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Considerations about naval designs
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:36 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

n7axw wrote:
Draken wrote:What about torpedoes they quite dangerous weapon which doesn't need very advanced technology. If I'm correct Charis could produce pretty nice torpedoes right now, they would be great for sneaky attack in the night, nobody will know that he was attacked before detonation of torpedo.
Other nice thing would be ship similar to USS Wasp, big ship designed to support landing operation of army, they won't have any planes for quite long time so landing deck would be useless, but mortars and howitzers instead of it would be really nice. I'm talking about big calibers 200+ mm, but I'm not thinking about extreme caliber like 800+ mm. I'm thinking about guns heavy enough to destroy any kind of fortification, but light enough to shoot fast.


Hi Draken,

This has been mentioned before and what it seems to keep coming back to is that given Charis' absolute naval supremacy at the moment, torpedoes such as you describe would be a lot more useful to the bad guys than to Charis. You are right that Charis could develop them, but no point in giving other people ideas of how they might hurt you...

Don

The other problem is that the US Navy steam powered torpedoes used hydrogen peroxide, which is really nasty stuff, and non trivial to produce (particularly without electricity). It's not clear what other power source they could use that doesn't violate the Proscriptions.
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top

Return to Safehold