Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests

Absurdly simple close combat firearm

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Absurdly simple close combat firearm
Post by Invictus   » Tue Nov 11, 2014 1:22 pm

Invictus
Commander

Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:00 am
Location: Perth, WA

evilauthor wrote:I would like to point out that Cayleb once mentioned wanting to shoot his sister's pet bird with a shotgun.

Aka, shotguns exist, although I don't know what form they take.


At that point, I'm thinking either a musketoon or a blunderbuss (if there is a real difference). Think muzzle-loading shotgun.

"When you talk about damage radius, even atomic weapons pale before that of an unfettered idiot in a position of power." Sam Starfall
Top
Re: Absurdly simple close combat firearm
Post by Duckk   » Tue Nov 11, 2014 1:39 pm

Duckk
Site Admin

Posts: 4200
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:29 pm

I think he specifically said fowling piece.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope
Top
Re: Absurdly simple close combat firearm
Post by Theemile   » Thu Nov 13, 2014 4:43 pm

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5241
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

Cheopis wrote:I was poking around on YouTube and found an interesting video.

I had never considered how simple it might be to manufacture a shotgun. Please ignore the fact that the guy is shooting a CO2 cartridge out of the weapon, and just notice how simple the construction of the weapon itself is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6zEUYl5FlY

This is something easily within the capabilities of anyone that can make smoothebore weapons of any type.

If you have some sort of percussion cap, Two pieces. A stock with a big pipe, and a bump at the base of the pipe to act as a strike point for the percussion cap. Then a smaller pipe that can fit inside the bigger pipe.

Some sort of flint and steel insert could be placed at the bottom of shells without percussion caps to generate a spark from slamming the two pipes together.

Reloading is super easy and fast. Outgassing is all down the tube, away from the face, though heavy gloves would be a definite plus. A handle and hand guard might be added to the inner barrel, to facilitate reloading, prevent the barrel from going downfield, and protect the hands from outgassing.

I could very easily see something like this used in urban fighting or naval battles. The accuracy would probably be almost useless for open field battles though.

Heck, one could simply issue percussion caps and powder charges, and direct the soldiers to put sand, pebbles, and other improvised ammunition in it. This might wear the weapons out quickly but who cares, they are so simple and cheap to make.

There would be the problem of people losing half of their weapon, or whatever, but the construction is so simple that even without unified construction methods, a soldier could probably match most inner and outer barrels together and have a serviceable weapon.


The US army manual for unconventional warfare (I don't remember the pub # off the top of my head) had instructions on how to make shotgun "traps" out of piping using a hinged board and a nail as the hammer - insanely simple, effective devices. I don't know if Id want to be holding it whe it went off or reload and fire it a second time, but as a one time, unmanned area denial weapon, it is effective.

Tom Clancey described another shotgun derived weapon in his book "Without Remorse" called a "bang stick." Pretty much a 2 piece capped pipe with a birdshot shell sitting on a nail inside the capped end - You thrust the open end into an opponent and and birdshot shell expends all its energy out the open end and into the target. A nasty, up close weapon.
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: Absurdly simple close combat firearm
Post by saber964   » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:50 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

Theemile wrote:
Cheopis wrote:I was poking around on YouTube and found an interesting video.

I had never considered how simple it might be to manufacture a shotgun. Please ignore the fact that the guy is shooting a CO2 cartridge out of the weapon, and just notice how simple the construction of the weapon itself is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6zEUYl5FlY

This is something easily within the capabilities of anyone that can make smoothebore weapons of any type.

If you have some sort of percussion cap, Two pieces. A stock with a big pipe, and a bump at the base of the pipe to act as a strike point for the percussion cap. Then a smaller pipe that can fit inside the bigger pipe.

Some sort of flint and steel insert could be placed at the bottom of shells without percussion caps to generate a spark from slamming the two pipes together.

Reloading is super easy and fast. Outgassing is all down the tube, away from the face, though heavy gloves would be a definite plus. A handle and hand guard might be added to the inner barrel, to facilitate reloading, prevent the barrel from going downfield, and protect the hands from outgassing.

I could very easily see something like this used in urban fighting or naval battles. The accuracy would probably be almost useless for open field battles though.

Heck, one could simply issue percussion caps and powder charges, and direct the soldiers to put sand, pebbles, and other improvised ammunition in it. This might wear the weapons out quickly but who cares, they are so simple and cheap to make.

There would be the problem of people losing half of their weapon, or whatever, but the construction is so simple that even without unified construction methods, a soldier could probably match most inner and outer barrels together and have a serviceable weapon.


The US army manual for unconventional warfare (I don't remember the pub # off the top of my head) had instructions on how to make shotgun "traps" out of piping using a hinged board and a nail as the hammer - insanely simple, effective devices. I don't know if Id want to be holding it whe it went off or reload and fire it a second time, but as a one time, unmanned area denial weapon, it is effective.

Tom Clancey described another shotgun derived weapon in his book "Without Remorse" called a "bang stick." Pretty much a 2 piece capped pipe with a birdshot shell sitting on a nail inside the capped end - You thrust the open end into an opponent and and birdshot shell expends all its energy out the open end and into the target. A nasty, up close weapon.



A bang stick is a real weapon its used by divers to kill really 'annoying' sharks.
Top
Re: Absurdly simple close combat firearm
Post by Thucydides   » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:50 pm

Thucydides
Captain of the List

Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:15 am

Shotguns are specialized firearms, so would not have wide issue unless there was a specific reason for this. The USMC used the Winchester M-1897 in the Great War since it was the most effective means of close quarters fighting in trenches that existed at the time (submachine guns and grenade launchers were in their infancy at the time). Shotguns are in limited issue these days for breaching doors and other nasty jobs, but are not in general issue.

I might point out that various "combat shotguns" have been mooted over the years, like the CAWS (Combat Automatic Weapons System) in the 1980's or the AA-12 (which has been around in one form or another since the 1970's), have yet to be adopted for service anywhere.

The AA-12 firing 12 gage "mini grenades" perhaps forecasts the real future of infantry weapons, but since the range and explosive power of the round is limited, the "real" weapon of the future will resemble the XM-25 more than the AA-12 (the cost really has to come down by an order of magnitude, though).

Aa far as Safehold is concerned, bolt action rifles are probably "good enough" for current tactics and field conditions, and the sorts of stamped steel weapons pioneered by Germany in WWII like the MG-42 GPMG and late war MKb Gerät 06 might be appropriate for the "generation after next" in Safehold should mass armies still be needed.
Top
Re: Absurdly simple close combat firearm
Post by AirTech   » Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:48 am

AirTech
Captain of the List

Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:37 am
Location: Deeeep South (Australia) (most of the time...)

Shotguns made out of 1/2" water pipe are very common in New Guinea, with a rubber band powered hammer firing a cartridge under a screwed pipe cap. Crude but functional if your other choice is a spear or bow and arrow. Automatic weapons do circulate but are way more expensive unless the previous owner no longer has an interest in it (or breathing).
Top

Return to Safehold