Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

Non-weapons of war, weapons of war

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war
Post by saber964   » Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:05 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

Tenshinai wrote:
I've proposed this before. Why doesn't the college come up with the Slide Rule?


Add mechanical calculators, like the ones that became popular during the 19th century RW, to that and maths suddenly goes a lot quicker.

Perhaps the start of learned journals, perhaps with some seed ideas from an anomalous thinker naked Owl


A NAKED Owl? Do i want to know what kind of seed ideas that would be? :twisted:

General Eisenhower expressed the opinion that four inventions won World War II. They were the jeep, the C47 airplane, the two-and-a-half ton truck, and the bulldozer, none of which were designed for combat.


Meh. The truck maybe. Something vastly more important however was cutting down on margins of precision. Which in turn allowed things like the Liberty ships, even when parts were not made in the same place or with the same tools, they were close enough in size that they fit together without too much trouble.

So i´ll add that as my contribution.
Have someone put together a set of standards for measuring, both the tools for measuring, the measurements, and how they are used, then make sure that everyone uses that standard as soon as possible.

As part of this, you also reduce the margins of error that is acceptable.

What it means, is that if a nut and a bolt are supposed to fit together, they WILL.
Which for example means that spare parts will nearly always fit without adjustments, which can save a LOT of time and effort.

A perfect example of not doing this, is WWII Japan. Parts and spare parts for aircraft nearly always had to be individually fitted to aircraft, and worked on locally, even engines could often not be switched out without a lot of work.
Effectively, it doubled the amount of work-hours spent on the average aircraft and caused lots of wasted parts and material.


This leads to mass-production and reliable automatic firearms among other things.


Your standard measurements are already happening in LAMA with the creation of the Imperial Bureau of Standards. IIRC with the help of OWL the Charisians have reinvented things like the steel rule, calipers, micrometers and combination square.

Also this forum is for non-weapons and an automatic firearm is a weapon.
Top
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war
Post by n7axw   » Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:54 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Whingnut wrote:I know that they had a lot of clerks who did calculations. And I feel like all their books are hand written. The introduction of printed and movable type would revolutionize communication and education. Books would be less expensive to produce and the advances in propaganda would be significant. It would also allow for the creation of instruction manuals for manufacturing and construction that would be easy to reproduce.

Does anyone remember if the broadsheets are created on printing presses?


Yes. Remember the scene in "By Heresies Distressed" where Patryk Haimree, the silversmith, is laying out type as he is being monitored by one of Merlin's snarcs.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war
Post by PeterZ   » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:30 am

PeterZ
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 6432
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:11 pm
Location: Colorado

I can see developing a steam automobile, steam truck and steam earth movers coming soon after this war is won. I just don't believe the CoGA can hold off the ICA armed with M96s. No C47s but perhaps a flash boiler steam powered dirigible.


Tonto Silerheels wrote:saber964 wrote:
This forum is for speculations on inventions that would help the Empire of C :) haris wage war but are not weapons eg cannons rifles, but would greatly enhance Charis war making potential in subtle ways like the sewing machine which can speed up the manufacture of things like uniforms, tents and blankets.

General Eisenhower expressed the opinion that four inventions won World War II. They were the jeep, the C47 airplane, the two-and-a-half ton truck, and the bulldozer, none of which were designed for combat.

~Tonto
Top
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war
Post by Earldrygulch   » Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:41 am

Earldrygulch
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:44 pm

Tonto Silerheels wrote:saber964 wrote:
This forum is for speculations on inventions that would help the Empire of Charis wage war but are not weapons eg cannons rifles, but would greatly enhance Charis war making potential in subtle ways like the sewing machine which can speed up the manufacture of things like uniforms, tents and blankets.

General Eisenhower expressed the opinion that four inventions won World War II. They were the jeep, the C47 airplane, the two-and-a-half ton truck, and the bulldozer, none of which were designed for combat.

~Tonto


I don't expect that Ike would consider the Higgins boat that big a deal. MacArthur might, though.
Top
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war
Post by AirTech   » Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:15 am

AirTech
Captain of the List

Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:37 am
Location: Deeeep South (Australia) (most of the time...)

Whingnut wrote:Marine chronometer to find the longitude. For greater accuracy in sea transportation. Actually knowing your longitute (latitude is relatively wasy) would lower the need for dead reckoning. A chronometer would require less information than celestial navigation (think of all those stars, planets, lunar cycles and their relative location on every night) It's invention would require the application of bimetallic springs. I know that safehold has some textev about watches I just forget where I read it (anyone know where). .

Of note. Failing to wind the chronometer on a ship was a mastable and keelhaulable offense.


Or invent a self winding chronometer - if they are sailing offshore then accurate time keeping saves lives.
Top
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war
Post by AirTech   » Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:47 am

AirTech
Captain of the List

Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:37 am
Location: Deeeep South (Australia) (most of the time...)

PeterZ wrote:I can see developing a steam automobile, steam truck and steam earth movers coming soon after this war is won. I just don't believe the CoGA can hold off the ICA armed with M96s. No C47s but perhaps a flash boiler steam powered dirigible.


Tonto Silerheels wrote:saber964 wrote:
This forum is for speculations on inventions that would help the Empire of C :) haris wage war but are not weapons eg cannons rifles, but would greatly enhance Charis war making potential in subtle ways like the sewing machine which can speed up the manufacture of things like uniforms, tents and blankets.

General Eisenhower expressed the opinion that four inventions won World War II. They were the jeep, the C47 airplane, the two-and-a-half ton truck, and the bulldozer, none of which were designed for combat.

~Tonto


The petrol engines in the C-47 needed spark ignition, a Junkers / Napier opposed-piston diesel may be possible in the near term (look up the Ju205 series & Deltic). Flash boiler aeroplanes are also possible (but an inefficient use of resources as a diesel engine is lighter).
Top
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war
Post by Tenshinai   » Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:49 am

Tenshinai
Admiral

Posts: 2893
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: Sweden

saber964 wrote:Also this forum is for non-weapons and an automatic firearm is a weapon.


:roll:

And i wasn´t suggesting a weapon, i noted that this allows easier massproduction and reliability, which greatly helps for automatics.

Your standard measurements are already happening in LAMA with the creation of the Imperial Bureau of Standards. IIRC with the help of OWL the Charisians have reinvented things like the steel rule, calipers, micrometers and combination square.


Maybe... Doesn´t go far enough yet.
Top
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war
Post by PeterZ   » Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:04 am

PeterZ
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 6432
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:11 pm
Location: Colorado

AirTech wrote:
PeterZ wrote:I can see developing a steam automobile, steam truck and steam earth movers coming soon after this war is won. I just don't believe the CoGA can hold off the ICA armed with M96s. No C47s but perhaps a flash boiler steam powered dirigible.


The petrol engines in the C-47 needed spark ignition, a Junkers / Napier opposed-piston diesel may be possible in the near term (look up the Ju205 series & Deltic). Flash boiler aeroplanes are also possible (but an inefficient use of resources as a diesel engine is lighter).


Revisiting diesel might be worth it, but I wonder if thoroughly developing steam first might be a wiser course. Toss too many new varieties of power sources at the existing clergy once the immediate threat of the CoGA is removed and they might just balk. I believe that thoroughly developing one source of power will ease the luddite tendencies of even the CoC clergy. Once steam systems become nigh ubiquitous, then introduce diesel. Besides, refining sufficient oil or producing other diesel usable fuels in commercial quantities is a long way off.
Top
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war
Post by saber964   » Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:24 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

PeterZ wrote:
PeterZ wrote:I can see developing a steam automobile, steam truck and steam earth movers coming soon after this war is won. I just don't believe the CoGA can hold off the ICA armed with M96s. No C47s but perhaps a flash boiler steam powered dirigible.


The petrol engines in the C-47 needed spark ignition, a Junkers / Napier opposed-piston diesel may be possible in the near term (look up the Ju205 series & Deltic). Flash boiler aeroplanes are also possible (but an inefficient use of resources as a diesel engine is lighter).


Revisiting diesel might be worth it, but I wonder if thoroughly developing steam first might be a wiser course. Toss too many new varieties of power sources at the existing clergy once the immediate threat of the CoGA is removed and they might just balk. I believe that thoroughly developing one source of power will ease the luddite tendencies of even the CoC clergy. Once steam systems become nigh ubiquitous, then introduce diesel. Besides, refining sufficient oil or producing other diesel usable fuels in commercial quantities is a long way off.[/quote]
Uh, IIRC during the 1860's and 70's they were refining crude oil into kerosene and dumping gasoline just by heating it
Top
Re: Non-weapons of war, weapons of war
Post by PeterZ   » Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:15 pm

PeterZ
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 6432
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:11 pm
Location: Colorado

I'll take your word for it, Sabre964. I would wonder though, if the weight and complexity of the transmission required in a diesel engine would make using the less efficient kerosene viable compared to using kerosene in a flashboiler steam engine. Not sure whick option would be optimal.
Top

Return to Safehold