Theemile wrote:Weird Harold wrote:If the device melts down after the third try, the computer's capacity means nothing.
has anyone tried 1 2 3 4 5 6?
Two tries left.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests
Re: Password question | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
Two tries left. .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: Password question | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
isaac_newton
Posts: 1182
|
your quantum computer is a bit slow... |
Top |
Re: Password question | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
Doesn't matter. If you try brute force, the device self destructs. .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: Password question | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Bluesqueak
Posts: 435
|
Or Schuler's birthday... |
Top |
Re: Password question | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Daryl
Posts: 3595
|
Or Password.
Or ******** from Dilbert's pointy haired boss who observed that all passwords magically changed to that.
|
Top |
Re: Password question | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Michae
Posts: 68
|
In short: to break the good machine-made password with brute force, you would need more time than Universe existence.[/quote]
Assuming you don't have access to a quantum computer - in which case the numbers come down considerably.[/quote] That's even if you could develop a quantum computer without electricity which I'd argue borders on impossible,which if you did have electricity you could go straight to fed-tech which could access the file reasonably successfully. Surely that would've had tools for this situation.. |
Top |