Pardon me,
I was distracted and closed the post above before finishing my comment.
Desnair needs to bring both its canals up to world standards, as well as adopt RR as connectors, where canals aren't possible, not just choosing one over the other.
They appear to be adopting RR as a cheap alternative to improving their canals; another big mistake if this is correct, they need both to truly modernize, but no indication these geniuses realise that, because they don't understand business.
Which will bite them on the butt, if they rely only on RR in their next war, thinking it will solve their supply problems.
Does RFC enjoy setting them up in this way.?
Best to all,
L
lyonheart wrote:Hi Evil Author,
Steam powered buses or 'steam coaches' were doing very well in Britain beginning in the 1830's until Parliament, because they were lobbied by the RR and horse carriage industry, passed a law restricting to follow a man carrying a warning sign as in the 1830's turnpike acts and confirmed again in the 1865 "Red Flag Act", that delayed steam road transport in Britain the most industrialized country in the world by 30-60 years.
Jerry Pournelle pointed out some of their advantages in A spaceship for the King, ~1971.
Steam started diesel engines are also an eventual possible power source.
Modifying the canals and rivers for faster steam tugs is probably being done in the EoC, because some bulk cargoes have such limited profit margins.
L
quote="evilauthor"[quote="isaac_newton"]
well - it also answered my question as to what an 'automotive' was. Trains not road vehicles.
/quote
This early in Charis' Industrial Revolution, "automotive" would likely refer to BOTH, ie, any self powered land vehicle regardless of whether they moved on rails or not. It's just that trains would be more efficient than road vehicles... especially if you don't have much in the way of good roads to begin with.
In fact, IIRC, trains are STILL more efficient than road vehicles even today. Road vehicles dominate today largely because they're much more flexible when it comes to destinations and paved roads are significantly cheaper to build and maintain than iron/steel railroads. But when it comes to pure hauling capacity (which will be more important in early industrialization), trains are more efficient than an equivalent number of road vehicles.
[/quote]