Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests

[HFQ] SPOILERS -- Why didn't Merlin?

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: [HFQ] SPOILERS -- Why didn't Merlin?
Post by n7axw   » Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:11 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

TBird50 wrote:
n7axw wrote:I don't believe that Sharley's rescue was botched or even that significant mistakes were made.

However it is also true that Merlin's role develops as the story progresses. I think the rescue was the first time Merlin was involved in what might be described as covert ops. It's certainly not unreasonable the role grows more sophisticated as time goes on.

However as a believer in Occum's razor (the kiss principle), I also think that one reason that things played out as they did was to give Merlin a plausible reason for spilling the truth to Sharleyan which he was wanting to do anyway.

Don

-


Well, maybe the rescue itself wasn't botched, but the situation was nearly an un-mitigated disaster. Sharleyan & Seahamper were the only two survivors, and Tayso & Raiyz were killed inside the guest house with her, so it could easily have been her killed instead of them. I totally agree that Merlin used the situation to tell Sharleyan the truth, but I don't think he would have wanted to do it that way. For one thing, Seahamper would have to be told too; so that doubled the risk. I think he wasn't too worried about Sharleyan, but I don't think he would have thought that telling Seahamper would be an optimal outcome.

I find it quite refreshing (if that's the right word) that Merlin isn't immune to making mistakes and mis-judgements. It makes him more human IMO. It's also fun to see him develop strategies, tactics and alternatives as Jeff discussed just above.

I keep saying I'm done, but I find this section of the story so fascinating that it's hard to quit.


While the rescue wasn't botched, the whole thing could have been handled with less loss of life had Merlin gotten on top of the situation sooner, perhaps by nipping the plot in the bud before the attack.

However, at that point, he was the only one keeping track of the snarcs and the task had snowballed to the point where he wasn't keeping up with it. What happened at St Agathas led to broadening the inner circle and getting some help so that the snarcs could be more effectively monitored.

Don

-
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: [HFQ] SPOILERS -- Why didn't Merlin?
Post by TBird50   » Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:22 pm

TBird50
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:32 pm

Don,

Yes and that's another reason this episode is so fascinating. I'm not saying it was a good thing, but because it happened and how it happened; it opened up Merlin's mind to the other possibilities such as Zhevons, using the remotes as messengers (rock thru the window), but also as you say to more quickly broaden the inner circle, and also to use the comms and contact lens so they all could stay in closer contact. I think it really took a giant leap in how they began to use some of Merlin's tech to assist them day to day. And even despite all those advantages, they still couldn't prevent Father Tymmans' murder in Corisande. The key thing IMO was getting more people in the circle more quickly. They had to have help monitoring the data and the attack on Sharleyan was the impetus for doing that.
Top

Return to Safehold