EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT!

gcomeau wrote:Aaaaand.... Mueller has hit Manafort with official indictments for Obstruction and Witness Tampering.


(You know, things innocent people do all the time.)

In a case that has nothing to do with Trump & predates by years before He worked on the Trump Campaign

Nimitz

Nimitz1923PD wrote:

gcomeau wrote:Aaaaand.... Mueller has hit Manafort with official indictments for Obstruction and Witness Tampering.


(You know, things innocent people do all the time.)

In a case that has nothing to do with Trump & predates by years before He worked on the Trump Campaign

Nimitz

Keep telling yourself that Trump's campaign manager who was indicted for his illegal dealings with foreign governments mostly in a very Russia friendly way which BEGAN years before he worked on Trump's campaign but CONTINUED right through it, after he was somehow appointed Trump's campaign manager in the first place for reasons nobody has ever really explained, has nothing to do with Trump.

I'm sure you find it comforting.

gcomeau"[quote="gcomeau wrote:Aaaaand.... Mueller has hit Manafort with official indictments for Obstruction and Witness Tampering.


(You know, things innocent people do all the time.)

In a case that has nothing to do with Trump & predates by years before He worked on the Trump Campaign

Nimitz[/quote]

Keep telling yourself that Trump's campaign manager who was indicted for his illegal dealings with foreign governments mostly in a very Russia friendly way which BEGAN years before he worked on Trump's campaign but CONTINUED right through it, after he was somehow appointed Trump's campaign manager in the first place for reasons nobody has ever really explained, has nothing to do with Trump.

I'm sure you find it comforting.[/quote]

There were no more Russian Friendly U.S. Politicians than Ted Kennedy, Bill & Hillary Clinton & Obama bar none since WWII

Nimitz

I take back what I said about learning to handle quotes.
Today I saw Trump on TV at the G7 stating arrogantly that Russia should be readmitted, and "They had a world to run". Not my world thanks.
Why should Russia ranked 11th by GDP, get a seat at the G8?

Nimitz1923PD wrote:

gcomeau"[quote="gcomeau wrote:Aaaaand.... Mueller has hit Manafort with official indictments for Obstruction and Witness Tampering.


(You know, things innocent people do all the time.)

In a case that has nothing to do with Trump & predates by years before He worked on the Trump Campaign

Nimitz

Daryl wrote:I take back what I said about learning to handle quotes.
Today I saw Trump on TV at the G7 stating arrogantly that Russia should be readmitted, and "They had a world to run". Not my world thanks.
Why should Russia ranked 11th by GDP, get a seat at the G8?

gcomeau"[quote="gcomeau wrote:Aaaaand.... Mueller has hit Manafort with official indictments for Obstruction and Witness Tampering.


(You know, things innocent people do all the time.)

In a case that has nothing to do with Trump & predates by years before He worked on the Trump Campaign

Nimitz

[/quote]
Why would Russia get a G8 seat?

Because they have Nuclear Submarines sitting about 50 miles off the U.S. East Coast targeting every U.S. city they can reach - that is why.

USN AWOC - BNAS - CPW5 - BRUNSWICK,ME
Before You dig that hole deeper

Nimitz

Nimitz1923PD wrote:Why would Russia get a G8 seat?

Because they have Nuclear Submarines sitting about 50 miles off the U.S. East Coast targeting every U.S. city they can reach - that is why.

Nimitz

Sooo....they should be *rewarded* for being hostile and belligerent and threatening.

Genius.

gcomeau wrote:

Nimitz1923PD wrote:Why would Russia get a G8 seat?

Because they have Nuclear Submarines sitting about 50 miles off the U.S. East Coast targeting every U.S. city they can reach - that is why.

Nimitz

Sooo....they should be *rewarded* for being hostile and belligerent and threatening.

Genius.

If You give them a big kiss on the lips - Maybe they will not target Your house

Nimitz

Nimitz1923PD wrote:

gcomeau wrote:
Sooo....they should be *rewarded* for being hostile and belligerent and threatening.

Genius.

If You give them a big kiss on the lips - Maybe they will not target Your house

Nimitz

You just essentially argued the US should give them a big kiss on the lips literally FOR targeting your house. I mean you specifically used that exact example of what they were doing. With nukes.

So why wouldn't they keep targetting it if it paid off so well the first time?

gcomeau wrote:

gcomeau wrote:
Sooo....they should be *rewarded* for being hostile and belligerent and threatening.

Genius.

If You give them a big kiss on the lips - Maybe they will not target Your house

Nimitz

You just essentially argued the US should give them a big kiss on the lips literally FOR targeting your house. I mean you specifically used that exact example of what they were doing. With nukes.

So why wouldn't they keep targetting it if it paid off so well the first time?[/quote]
^^^-------''------'''''--'----
No personnally I would put every US Navy Aswoc on alert a turn every major city in in Iran into a field of glass -

As a demostration for Russia

Nimitz

Nimitz1923PD wrote: If You give them a big kiss on the lips - Maybe they will not target Your house

Nimitz

The only reason to give a hostile a kiss on the lips is to distract them enough to get your knee into their nadgers*.

Of course, Trump can't do that since he's already on his knees in front of Putin.

*Nadgers - slang for a portion of the male reproductive organs, specifically the testicles and scrotum, hence the phrase "I'll have your nadgers for boot leather!"