Dilandu wrote:cthia wrote:
I'm simply attempting to point out that all is not as it seems. You can't judge a book by its cover. And if you want to know what's inside the book, don't rely on the internet.
It would be splendid advice, if you & TFY did not demonstrate constant attempts do do exactly that, you know. And I do not claim that I know US system perfectly (albeit I have a nasty suspicion that I knew more about America, than you about Russia). I just pointed out, that your medical system blundered the coronavirus pandemic and there are reasons to believe that it is not just an accident, but more likely it is the system failure. And your argument is "but we invested more than anyone else in research!" - sorry, but it starts to sound exactly like the late Soviet "there are no sugar in stores, but hey, our country is on first place by the cast-iron production growth!"
Not exactly, speaking for myself. I often look for "support" on the internet of things I already know from "other" sources. Like the accusation against your country for it's illegal online sourcing of illegal pharmaceuticals is a constant aggravation of my sister's. These drugs are analysed by people like my sister in attempts to identify the source.
Ditto the use of American pharma infrastructure by foreign countries is a discussion emanating from my sister and colleagues, "backed by" the internet.
I don't often participate in these threads. When I do, it is because something has really gotten my goat, usually because something goes way out on a limb over very thin ice.
Of past history that has gotten my goat... illegal immigrants, guns, politics, and, now, medicine and pharmaceuticals are topics about America that internet Americans hardly have a clue.
No doubt, with the internet, you can catch wind of problems, but you can't rely on it to analyze it. You are too far removed. The subject of guns? Pfft!