Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

One Oregon Property owner socks it to the Fish and Game

The Management is not responsible for the contents of this forum. Enter at your own risk.
One Oregon Property owner socks it to the Fish and Game
Post by pokermind   » Sat Jun 11, 2016 6:48 pm

pokermind
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4002
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:58 am
Location: Jerome, Idaho, USA

this is both funny and sad. Fish and Game asked land holders to allow surveys for an endangered frog. The result of them finding said amphibian is the los of the use of your land with no compensation. The reason many famrs in California are without water a false lack of water there no reservoirs to protect an endangered species by letting the rivers flow naturally ar filled causing people to lose there now farms. Thus when aske for permission to hunt their land for the endangered frog the land owners wrote a very funny reply. minoring F&G regulations See:

http://conservativetribune.com/bullies- ... manualpost

Remember when asked anything of the nanny state the magic word is NO. can we search your [fill in the blank] NO.

Poker
CPO Poker Mind Image and, Mangy Fur the Smart Alick Spacecat.

"Better to be hung for a hexapuma than a housecat," Com. Pang Yau-pau, ART.
Top
Re: One Oregon Property owner socks it to the Fish and Game
Post by biochem   » Sat Jun 11, 2016 10:27 pm

biochem
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1372
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:06 pm
Location: USA

Reminds me of the infamous beaver dam letter.

Dear Mr. Price:
Re: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N, R10W, Sec 20; Montcalm County

Your certified letter dated 12/17/97 has been handed to me to respond to. You sent out a great deal of carbon copies to a lot of people, but you neglected to include their addresses. You will, therefore, have to send them a copy of my response.

First of all, Mr. Ryan DeVries is not the legal landowner and/or contractor at 2088 Dagget, Pierson, Michigan — I am the legal owner and a couple of beavers are in the (State unauthorized) process of constructing and maintaining two wood "debris" dams across the outlet stream of my Spring Pond. While I did not pay for, nor authorize, their dam project, I think they would be highly offended you call their skillful use of natural building materials "debris." I would like to challenge you to attempt to emulate their dam project any dam time and/or any dam place you choose. I believe I can safely state there is no dam way you could ever match their dam skills, their dam resourcefulness, their dam ingenuity, their dam persistence, their dam determination and/or their dam work ethic.

As to your dam request the beavers first must fill out a dam permit prior to the start of this type of dam activity, my first dam question to you is: are you trying to discriminate against my Spring Pond Beavers or do you require all dam beavers throughout this State to conform to said dam request? If you are not discriminating against these particular beavers, please send me completed copies of all those other applicable beaver dam permits. Perhaps we will see if there really is a dam violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws annotated.

My first concern is — aren't the dam beavers entitled to dam legal representation? The Spring Pond Beavers are financially destitute and are unable to pay for said dam representation — so the State will have to provide them with a dam lawyer. The Department's dam concern that either one or both of the dams failed during a recent rain event causing dam flooding is proof we should leave the dam Spring Pond Beavers alone rather than harassing them and calling them dam names. If you want the dam stream "restored" to a dam free-flow condition — contact the dam beavers — but if you are going to arrest them (they obviously did not pay any dam attention to your dam letter-being unable to read English) — be sure you read them their dam Miranda rights first.

As for me, I am not going to cause more dam flooding or dam debris jams by interfering with these dam builders. If you want to hurt these dam beavers — be aware I am sending a copy of your dam letter and this response to PETA. If your dam Department seriously finds all dams of this nature inherently hazardous and truly will not permit their existence in this dam State — I seriously hope you are not selectively enforcing this dam policy, or once again both I and the Spring Pond Beavers will scream prejudice!

In my humble opinion, the Spring Pond Beavers have a right to build their dam unauthorized dams as long as the sky is blue, the grass is green, and water flows downstream. They have more dam right than I to live and enjoy Spring Pond. So, as far as I and the beavers are concerned, this dam case can be referred for more dam elevated enforcement action now. Why wait until 1/31/98? The Spring Pond Beavers may be under the dam ice then, and there will be no dam way for you or your dam staff to contact/harass them then. In conclusion, I would like to bring to your attention a real environmental quality (health) problem: bears are actually defecating in our woods. I definitely believe you should be persecuting the defecating bears and leave the dam beavers alone. If you are going to investigate the beaver dam, watch your step! (The bears are not careful where they dump!) Being unable to comply with your dam request, and being unable to contact you on your dam answering machine, I am sending this response to your dam office.

Sincerely,
Stephen L. Tvedten
Top
Re: One Oregon Property owner socks it to the Fish and Game
Post by Imaginos1892   » Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:52 pm

Imaginos1892
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:24 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Haw haw haw! He should have included:
If you intend to discuss these matters with the Spring Pond Beavers, it will be your responsibility to provide an interpreter. All of our attempts to communicate with the Beavers have resulted in blank stares or complete indifference.

------------------------
Why do so many idiots believe that the way to solve our problems is to keep re-electing the same shitheads that caused them in the first place?
Top
Re: One Oregon Property owner socks it to the Fish and Game
Post by WeirdlyWired   » Mon Sep 05, 2016 6:45 pm

WeirdlyWired
Captain of the List

Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:08 pm
Location: 35 NW center of nowhere.

Why do so many idiots believe that the way to solve our problems is to keep re-electing the same shitheads that caused them in the first place?[/quote]

Mostly because " My representative is doing a damfine job. You need to get rid of yours." A twist on the Not made here mentality?
Helas,chou, Je m'en fache.
Top
Re: One Oregon Property owner socks it to the Fish and Game
Post by Annachie   » Wed Sep 07, 2016 5:30 am

Annachie
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3099
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:36 pm

Well, the only way they could loose their land in such circumstances is if it wasn't actually their land.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
still not dead. :)
Top

Return to Politics