grendel_one wrote:Tenshinai wrote:Easy to fix, maybe. More importantly, that´s the kind of thing that is also even more easy to get wrong.
That´s why there´s so much computer program bugs...
I've often thought about the similarities between writing a novel and writing software.
Novels need a compiler-like program that will check for invalid internal references and update tools that ensure if you change one variable somewhere, all references to it get updated.
Also you can look at similarities between overall design and syntax.
Hehe, yeah you wish... That´s really why there should be an endless amount of work for people like me, proofreaders. Except it´s become standard to use the closest to your suggestion that exists, and the result has of course been that the quality of language in newspapers, in movies and on tv has gone far beyond "down the drain"...
The problem with automated stuff is that it´s dumb, as long as something looks potentially correct, it calls it fine.
For example, i´ve been reading a bit over at fanfiction.net lately, and you can totally see which ones are using spellcheckers, who are using grammar checking software and who´re actually good at language...