Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests
CLAC Comparrison | |
---|---|
by Sigs » Sun Oct 30, 2016 11:50 pm | |
Sigs
Posts: 1485
|
I have been looking at the size of the CLAC's for RMN/GSN and RHN and I am wondering if I am missing something here, there are about 150 LAC's more in a Havenite CLAC while it is only ~2,000,000 tons larger than a Manticoran CLAC. Are Havenite CLAC's unarmed and with paper for armour?
Or are Havenite LAC's so dramatically smaller than their RMN/GSN counterparts to make it feasible for there to be so much more of them in such a marginal increase in hull space. If it is indeed possible for the RMN to fit 250 of their LAC's in an SD sized carrier why do they intentionally go for such a reduced amount of firepower just for a slightly faster hull? I realize that the RMN's doctrine calls for faster carriers but does the speed/acel advantage make it worth the sacrifice of LAC's? |
Top |
Re: CLAC Comparrison | |
---|---|
by Theemile » Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:07 am | |
Theemile
Posts: 5241
|
Yep, havenite carriers are merchie hulls with no hammerheads. They are SD sized (2.5 mons bigger), and only have a basic defense suite. If I heard correctly from Tom Pope, a 1st Gen Cimmeterre is ~27 ktons, but I do not know the dimensions. That makes it 7 tons heavier than the RMN LACs, and blurring the definition of a Corvette. The 1st Gen CLACS are generalist designs, like all RMN wsrships. The 2nd war taught them much, and the next Gen is supposed to include a large fleet carrier, like the havenite design, and a hardened Assault carrier to escort walls and rearm LACS in battle. ******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships." |
Top |
Re: CLAC Comparrison | |
---|---|
by Fox2! » Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:15 am | |
Fox2!
Posts: 925
|
The Aviarry class CLAC are SD sized. The RMN/GSN CLACs are more DN sized. The original PN requirement for a carrier was to defend their wall against Manty/Grayson attacks, so being able to outrun an SD was not needed. The RMN/GSN CONOPS required a ship that could (mostly) keep up with BCs. |
Top |
Re: CLAC Comparrison | |
---|---|
by Sigs » Mon Oct 31, 2016 2:12 am | |
Sigs
Posts: 1485
|
Since the carriers would be designed to provide a LAC screen for SD's they would need only purely defensive weapons and light armour. But for the DN hulls, is there really a need for fast assault carriers? There might be a need for an assault carrier for BC squadron operations but once they breakdown in division strength they would still depend on DD's and CL's for screen. To me the RMN doctrine should call for plenty of fleet carriers and a few assault carriers. Having a lot of essentially light and fast carriers is a waste of resources when your battle squadrons are the once needing the LAC screen the most. |
Top |
Re: CLAC Comparrison | |
---|---|
by Theemile » Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:43 pm | |
Theemile
Posts: 5241
|
Personally, I believe the only way Admiral Adcock got the CLAC project green lighted originally was that it utilized some underutilized old DN building slips which had been sitting mostly unused for a couple years when the last DN was completed. Since the prototype didn't take away from building SDs, it was allowed. If it had been bigger, it might not have been. Afterward, they just continued the pattern, which had the benefit of continuing utilizing any old DN slips which couldn't fit the newer SD designs. There is no textev for this, but it does explain the smaller size, especially when they intentionally had to fatten the DN shape to fit in the LACs. ******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships." |
Top |
Re: CLAC Comparrison | |
---|---|
by Somtaaw » Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:55 pm | |
Somtaaw
Posts: 1203
|
Theemile likely nailed the reasoning on the head, that Adcock likely sold the test building of CLAC's because they were DN sized. In Echoes of Honor when we first see the Minotaur, Truman mentions how projections always called for a minimum dreadnought sized hull and Adcock sold the board stating "the best test is 10 millimeters to the centimeter"; in other words to build full-size. Since they had plenty of DN slips that weren't really being used, unless they were building extra battlecruisers in the DN slips, they just kept building the standard DN size CLACs rather than building larger SD sized CLAC's to counter the Havenite CLAC's. And they quickly adapted to the presence of Havenite LAC's by changing the CLAC loads with considerably LESS Shrikes. Shrikes are the best for killing starships, but for hostiles LAC's they proved considerably less efficient than Ferrets let alone the space superiority Katana's. I think the original loadout was ~20 Ferrets supporting ~80 Shrikes, based on the original Buttercup LAC training fights. Even at their best, Cimeterre's needed a 2:1 numeric advantage to have combat parity that 80/20 mix. Soon as Katana's got added into the mix, even before Admiral Truman and Miklos changed it up post-Cutworm, Cimeterre's started needing upwards of 4:1 numeric advantage, so the RMN DN CLAC's are still 'better' than RHN SD CLACs, because you NEED two Aviary CLAC's to beat a single Minotaur style CLAC that only has Katana's. We know at full stride, Manticore could churn out a true superdreadnought in between 12-14 months, and a dreadnought in 8-10 months, and that Haven was still taking 16+ to get a superdreadnought built. If you ignore the differences between a regular waller and a CLAC, than means the RMN was fielding 2 brand new CLAC's for every one Haven built. Now with the war against Haven being finished, and that Cimeterre's are larger than Manticoran LAC's, until the Manticoran yards can be rebuilt Havenite CLAC's will fill the majority of defensive fleet carriers, protecting the podnoughts. Any existing Manticoran/Grayson CLAC's can be utilized in offensive assault carrier roles, mostly keeping up with battlecruiser raiding fleets. |
Top |
Re: CLAC Comparrison | |
---|---|
by saber964 » Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:33 pm | |
saber964
Posts: 2423
|
The biggest reason Haven went for SD sized CLAC's was the fact that there LAC's were inferior Manticores LAC's.
|
Top |
Re: CLAC Comparrison | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:16 am | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8792
|
Amusingly (to me at least) if Have had had a solid understanding of the threat Shrikes actually pose to wallers they probably wouldn't have gone so heavy on CLAC construction. In a lot of ways their CLACs and LAC swarm were designed to blunt a threat to the battle line that didn't really exist. Shrikes attempting to swarm a reasonably intact wall of battle would be slaughtered. But because Haven couldn't be sure of that they invested in space denial LACs to break up Shrike sweeps. But the most ships that are vulnerable to that aren't worth allocating an SD sized CLAC to provide LAC screen to. Maybe it makes sense fir BC squardons, but so much not smaller ships... To be fair, they still needed the LAC design to discourage system raids by LACs. But they arguably didn't really need the CLACs as fixed bases would be better for system defense, the wall didn't really need screening from LACs, and Destroyers and Cruisers don't rate CLAC auxiliaries. |
Top |
Re: CLAC Comparrison | |
---|---|
by Somtaaw » Tue Nov 01, 2016 8:57 am | |
Somtaaw
Posts: 1203
|
I suppose it depends how you define intact wall of battle, against a single squadron of Havenite dreadnoughts or superdreadnoughts, plus a proper screen, a single division worth of CLAC's would inflict punishing damage on it. In Echoes of Honor, the Minotaur's brood carried out a simulated attack that included attacking 4 SD's plus battlecruisers escorting a convoy and they massacred everything. So two full loads worth of Shrike-B's, with the Ferrets, without any Katana's would certainly be capable of wiping out a SD squadron, a BC squadron, and the light cruiser/destroyer screen. The term screen seems very, very vague however in Honorverse. In SVW, Sarnow's battlecruiser squadron was 'screened' by a full heavy cruiser squadron in addition to a light cruiser squadron. In Echoes of Honor, the Operation Icarus had
36 SDs, 16 DNs, 81 BS, and 24 BC's for the capital ships, even if we shift the heavy cruisers over to the screen, the capital ships outnumber their screen by almost 2.5 to 1. Which is almost opposite from Sarnow's ratio of 1 capital ship to 2 screen. The true danger to LAC's isn't even really wallers, it's the screen, because presumably it's the screens formation that enables far more targetting angles, removing Shrikes capabilities to roll ship and present only their 'vulnerable' bow walls to just their target. Soon as you remove the screen from the equation, even the original Shrike-Alpha's (the Minotaur testbed Shrikes) would have been capable of severely mauling Havenite superdreadnoughts. They wouldn't have been able to do more than mission kill, but even those first gen Shrike's were a genuine threat to wallers, provided the screen was removed from the equations. |
Top |
Re: CLAC Comparrison | |
---|---|
by Somtaaw » Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:13 am | |
Somtaaw
Posts: 1203
|
So in my latest reread of the series, I actually just hit the Second Hancock, first combat use of the Shrikes. Now obviously, there initial strike attacking the Havenite pods was from surprise but let's recap it all.
Havenite task force: 30+ Battleships 10-12 Heavy cruisers half dozen destroyers Manticoran forces: 96 Shrikes - first generation Shrike ambush to destroy pods, Minotaur firing her first salvo of MDM's, and Truitt's task group only actually killed 3 battleships, 2 destroyers and 6 heavy cruisers (one of which actually died from one of the battleships shooting it accidentally). During this first strike, 4 Shrikes were complete casualties, and 1 damaged so heavily it pulled out of the battle. Admiral Truitt's fleet turned to cut the chord on the Havenites, and kept launching missiles until they ran out of missiles, while the Shrikes kept scissoring. By the time Truitt fell out of range, a total of 4 additional battleships have died (book says a total of 9 out of 33 have now died), all tin cans are destroyed and only 2 badly damaged heavy cruisers are left. At this point, 75 Shrikes are still intact out of the initial 96. Shrikes were on their last attack, when the Havenite flagship took crippling damage and Porter finally takes command, giving the scatter order that brought utter destruction to the battleships. All of that information is condensed from Chapter 33, Echoes of Honor. An intact wall of battle is certainly devastating to LACs, but that was also 3+ squadrons of battleships, versus the LACs carried aboard a single CLAC, also admittedly the very first battle, so surprise was still a factor. Later Buttercap offensive, and beginning of the second Havenite War actually continued to prove however, that a LAC strike that has similar numbers will still be deadly even to unbroken walls of battle. However throughout the Second Haven War, when both sides had LAC's and used CLAC's offensively, they never ever actually brought meaningful numbers, the war was almost entirely carried out by podnoughts alone. My rough guess, is that it would take at least 2 divisions of CLAC's to every intact waller squadron you plan to attack, even if it turns out to be another Battle of Manticore and you're throwing LACs at 400+ superdreadnoughts moving in formation. For that notional BoMa repeat, you'd need 200 CLAC's worth of LACs; which would be carrying 24,000 LAC's if they are Manticoran CLACs. Of that 24,000 Manticoran LACs, if you excluded any Katana's would be a mix of 19,000 Shrike-Bravo's and 5,000 Ferrets. Shrike Bravo's are essentially the LAC version of the cruiser weight Mark 16 mod-G missile, the firepower of old-style wallers, in cruiser size. If memory serves, at the real BoMa the Manticoran LAC's had less than half my theoretical requirement and were coming in at maximum acceleration with near zero EW used. And after they smashed through the devastated Havenite screen, literally could not slow down enough to re-organize before they were already flying through the Havenite podnoughts. On a slightly aside here, the LAC crews knew they were already doomed, so why did none of them try to accelerate, and deliberately ram a sidewall?
Ok, LAC's don't have sidewall penetrators, but an impact from a 78 ton missile at 0.25c with penetrators, and a 20 kton LAC impacting at the same velocity without penetrators, is that not simply a case of finesse (using the considerably smaller, penetrators) and brute force (using an entire LAC) to drop sidewalls? Rough on the LACs sure, but a handful that deliberately accelerate ahead of the pack and slam into sidewalls to forcibly drop them, doubles the effective range of the Shrike's; and at that range the podnoughts wouldn't be able to roll before the light-speed grasers had already arrived and savaged them. |
Top |