Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Jonathan_S and 85 guests
Wedge sizes | |
---|---|
by MaxxQ » Fri Jul 15, 2016 10:53 pm | |
MaxxQ
Posts: 1553
|
So, as I mentioned in another thread, I talked to Tom at the BuNine Meeting a couple weekends ago, and asked if he could give me some info on wedge sizes for various classes of ships. He came through for me today, and basically gave me a copy of his RMN ship spreadsheets. Lots of great info, 90% of which I have no idea what it is, so don't ask.
Anyway, before I get the info posted, I need to mention a couple things: first, all numbers given are in kilometers (of course), and second, the wedges are square. Also, the ships listed are pretty much all the ships listed in HoS, minus the Grayson ships - Tom only gave me RMN info. I'm not sure if there are enough data points elsewhere, but the info I put in that other thread is accurate for the CA Fearless, which is one data point for figuring what the distances from the ship the wedge planes are, and also for the size of the openings (throat and kilt). Also, there was no info on wedges for missiles, pinnaces, CMs, etc. So, on to the info that a few of you want to see: SD(P) Medusa-B - 342 Medusa - 336 Invictus - 339 SD Victory - 326 Sphinx - 331 Samothrace - 318 Manticore - 307 King William - 317 Gryphon - 333 Anduril - 322 DN Royal Winton - 295 Majestic - 310 Gladiator - 312 Bellerophon - 314 AdAstra - 258 CLAC Minotaur - 275 Hydra - 274 BC & BC(P) Agamemnon - 198 Reliant - 173 Reliant III - 177 Redoubtable - 167 Nike - 246 Homer - 170 CA Warrior - 115 Truncheon - 114 Star Knight - 127 Edward Saganami - 138 Saganami-B - 142 Saganami-C - 148 Prince Consort - 118 Crusader - 116 Broadsword - 129 CL Kamerling (CL(L)) - 138 Valiant - 114 Talisman - 106 Illustrious - 109 Courageous - 95 Courageous (Fearless Refit) - 95 Avalon - 112 Apollo - 106 Apollo Extension (Flight IV) - 107 DD Wolfhound - 104 Roland - 108 Noblesse - 85 Javelin - 93 Havoc - 92 Falcon - 86 Culverin - 98 Chanson - 89 LAC Highlander - 34 Series 282 - 39 Shrike - 41 Shrike-B - 42 Ferret - 41 AMC Caravan - 261 =================
Honorverse Art: http://maxxqbunine.deviantart.com/ Honorverse Video: http://youtu.be/fy8e-3lrKGE http://youtu.be/uEiGEeq8SiI http://youtu.be/i99Ufp_wAnQ http://youtu.be/byq68MjOlJU |
Top |
Re: Wedge sizes | |
---|---|
by Weird Harold » Sat Jul 16, 2016 12:48 am | |
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
Thanx for the time and effort!
.
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: Wedge sizes | |
---|---|
by Theemile » Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:43 am | |
Theemile
Posts: 5241
|
Thanks Maxxq.
One interesting Data point... Medusa B. Reopens the question, did one or 2 actually get built before OB? The RMN has had hundreds of theoretical designs over the years, so why include just 1 ship that never was? ******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships." |
Top |
Re: Wedge sizes | |
---|---|
by Relax » Sat Jul 16, 2016 7:40 am | |
Relax
Posts: 3214
|
So, wedge area scales linearly with tonnage...
_________
Tally Ho! Relax |
Top |
Re: Wedge sizes | |
---|---|
by darrell » Sat Jul 16, 2016 8:26 am | |
darrell
Posts: 1390
|
not quite. the medusa SDP wedge is 336^2=112,896 if they scaled linearly by tonnage, the reliant BC wedge would be 10k-15K. Instead it is 173^2=29,929 <><><><><><><><><><><><>
Logic: an organized way to go wrong, with confidence. |
Top |
Re: Wedge sizes | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Sat Jul 16, 2016 8:32 am | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8792
|
Not really. Plotting those against tonnage and playing with trend lines even my quick and dirty first analysis shows that a power series is a far better fit (though locally that's not far off from linear; but when stretched across the range of tonnages...) (or click here for slightly larger version. I should go back and make some close-ups of various parts of that charge. I don't have a big enough display to make the whole chart readable at once. Initial eyeball looks like the LACs are slightly off line. Might play with removing them. I'd certainly want to remove the Wayfarer since it's merchant-grade wedge is clearly off on a different curve. Looks like the pair of CLACs is off as well (which does actually fit in with them being lower accel than you'd guess from their tonnage and year in-service.) But what's also interesting is that the designs laid down with improved compensators do appear to be on trend-line; the increased design acceleration didn't cause a change in their design wedge size. |
Top |
Re: Wedge sizes | |
---|---|
by Somtaaw » Sat Jul 16, 2016 8:53 am | |
Somtaaw
Posts: 1203
|
Thanks for the great base post Maxx, and then the neat little visual chart from Jon... would almost want to make this good thread stickied, as I'm sure many of us will be wanting to refer to it at various points over the next few years.
|
Top |
Re: Wedge sizes | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:04 am | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8792
|
Thanks, and you're welcome. And I forgot to also thank Maxxq for providing those details. So Thank you Maxxq. (And full disclosure I did drop two data points before making that chart; the Medusa-B and the Courageous (Fearless Refit) because House of Steel doesn't list them to provide tonnages) |
Top |
Re: Wedge sizes | |
---|---|
by MaxxQ » Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:26 am | |
MaxxQ
Posts: 1553
|
A general "you're welcome" to all. I debated whether to keep the Medusa-B and the Courageous/Fearless refit, *because* they weren't listed in HoS, but I thought there might have been some interest in those two ships. Technically, the list should be nearly twice as long, as there were many ships and ship types I didn't even recognize. <forrestgump> And that's all I have to say about that </forrestgump> Edit: Also, Tom *did* say that wedge size gets "interesting" for small stuff like missiles. But I suppose that's expected considering how overpowered they are, and that they don't have to consider organics. =================
Honorverse Art: http://maxxqbunine.deviantart.com/ Honorverse Video: http://youtu.be/fy8e-3lrKGE http://youtu.be/uEiGEeq8SiI http://youtu.be/i99Ufp_wAnQ http://youtu.be/byq68MjOlJU |
Top |
Re: Wedge sizes | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:41 am | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8792
|
Yeah, that would have to be a totally different chart, since we're told missiles have IIRC a 10 km wide wedge; but a Highlander LAC massing dozens of times as much has only a 34 km one. And that's probably barely even the beginning ofthe "interesting" items about them. |
Top |