

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests
Math problem | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Lonny
Posts: 7
|
In chapter 13 of SftS as Admiral Henke is leaving Hephaestus she is thinking about the squadron reorganization plan the Janacek Admiralty had put into place.
She's thinking that the reduction of squadron size from 8 ships to 6 ships will require 25% more admirals and staffs for the same number of ships. If you have 3 squadrons of 8 ships for a total of 24 ships and you change to 4 squadrons of 6 ships for a total of 24 ships you go from needing 3 admirals etc. to 4 admirals etc. This is an increase of 33 1/3% rather than 25%. I don't remember noticing this the first time through. I am reading the E-ARC version. Maybe this was fixed in the final version. Lonny |
Top |
Re: Math problem | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Shannon_Foraker
Posts: 197
|
http://baencd.freedoors.org/Books/Storm ... hadows.htm I wasn't doing the math when I was reading, but thought I'd find the quote for others trying to figure things out. |
Top |
Re: Math problem | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
ThinksMarkedly
Posts: 4645
|
Hello Lonny Welcome to the forum. Since this is Henke's insights, not author infodump or omniscient narration, maybe the one who made the math mistake was Mike herself. As you calculated, 24 ships are now 4 squadrons instead of 3, so she calculated that 25% of the squadrons are new and thus 25% of the admirals and staffs were new. It was the wrong math for what she was pondering (inverted result), but an easy one to make because it's related. |
Top |
Re: Math problem | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
munroburton
Posts: 2379
|
It's not just the inversion, though. If we look at the Fleet Strengths of 1920pd chart, it says that the RMN has 200 wallers. Pre-Janacek, that splits into 25 8-ship squadrons. After Janacek, it was 33 or 34 6-ship squadrons. Whilst this is a 33% increase, it completely overlooks the presence of Divisional commanders and their staffs. Of which there are going to be 100, regardless of squadron sizes. The increase from 125 to 134 is only about 8%. |
Top |
Re: Math problem | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
ThinksMarkedly
Posts: 4645
|
While all true, that's not the point. She was simply pondering that the Janacek Admiralty was fudging the numbers and opening up positions for cronies. She made a mental calculation that went along with it. That it was inverted from what the actual number should be is not important. It also doesn't take into account the fact that the fleet was shrunk in size, so there were also fewer wallers in active service and thus fewer Rear Admirals required for division commands. Moreover, many of the people holding the top posts were also put to half-pay, so that opened some other positions. The actual number might have been available to her if she looked it up, but she didn't at that time. |
Top |