Sigs wrote:ThinksMarkedly wrote:
I agree it did not lose all of it. But not for the reason you stated: it makes no sense to build components down a gravity well if the raw material and the final destination are both in space. And you wouldn't mine your planet if you have readily accessible rocks in space that are otherwise useless junk. Once you have space industry capability, you build things in space.
I would thing that the majority of humanity is conditioned to live in open space like on a planet so my assumption is that even if it is a little more problematic to move the raw materials and finished product it would be offset by the fact that long term the majority of your work force might prefer a planetary location and I would assume that maintaining infrastructure in space would be more involved and expensive than infrastructure on a planet.
(snip the rest)
I'm coming with different perspective, but I admit much of this depends on factors we simply don't know. My perspective is highly biased to orbital habitats, which are actually cheap to produce and maintain for a civilisation that can build starships and the shipyards to build them. I invite you to watch some of the Megastructures and Colonising Space playlists in Isaac Arthur's YouTube channel for more details, but the summary is that, as we understand physics today, we'd colonise other systems *first* in space, then land on planets. That is, a newly arrived colonising fleet would first set up asteroid mining and hydrogen/helium extraction for fusion, then build habitats close to those production sources, then attempt to land.
But like I said, it depends on parameters we don't know. Given the abundance of habitable planets in the Honorverse, and the existence of countergrav and impellers, the conclusions might well be the opposite. After all, if it's cheap to get out of the gravity well, then you may as well set up shop down there for purely psychological reasons.
In fact, I should probably just agree with you. Take the example of Beowulf: a system settled for nearly 1900 years where the biggest orbital habitat had "only" 22 million people and there were few enough of them that you referred to them by Greek letters. If Arthur's predictions were correct for the Honorverse, Beowulf and Sol should have anywhere from tens of thousands to tens of millions of habitats, with a population of a similar magnitude greater. Since that isn't the case, the economics must have worked differently.