namelessfly wrote:http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/leoka/2012/tables/table_35_leos_fk_with_firearms_type_of_firearm_and_size_of_ammunition_2003-2012.xls
Try getting your facts straight rather than spewing propaganda.n7axw wrote:I guess I am going to have to weigh in on the other side. I have no desire to deny constitutional rights.
As for the right to seceed, that is now settled, not with legal arguments but in blood at places like Gettysburg, Shiloh and so on. Consequently there is no right of sucession, whatever the framers might have intended to start with.
As for the gun arguments, ccould we please have some practical sense? No one, least of all me has any particular objection to guns in the possession of responsible people, but look at what we actually have:
1.criminal gangs in some our cities who actually outgun the police who are trying to apprehend them.
2.Deranged individuals who wander through college campuses and yes, even grade schools shooting kids...easy access to guns guaranteed.
3.people who live in dangerous neighborhoods afraid to let their children out to play for fear they will be shot.
Gang, the way we tolerate this crap is both outrageous and stupid to say nothing of morally reprehensible. On a personal level, I find it offensive when the pro-gun people talk like their right to bear arms is more important than my right to walk down the street without the fear of getting shot.
Don
How I feel about the matter is how I feel. No propaganda involved. I stand by my post.
Don