Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

Firebrand's agenda...

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Firebrand's agenda...
Post by SharkHunter   » Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:37 am

SharkHunter
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:53 pm
Location: Independence, Missouri

Hate to wake up an old thread but just rediscovered this jaw droppng little set of tidbits:

--snipping--
stewart wrote:Harahap / Firebrand is an opportunist -- admitted in his unspoken comments to himself -- He was playing the best game available.

He can tell where he operated and where other operations (not his) occurred that he knows about, but in reality he is a local, tactical operator, NOT a strategic planner or manipulator.

-- Stewart
This is a Captain Gweon, "the head of one of ONI’s main sections" speaking:
A Rising Thunder, ch.31 wrote:...
"Frankly, if I were the Manties, I’d be doing everything I could to further disrupt the Protectorates. For that matter, I’d be stirring up all the unrest I could among the Office of Frontier Security’s…client states.”
Then we discover --bolding mine--
A Rising Thunder wrote:Gweon sensed her reaction and grimaced an apology... “Sorry, Erzi. Maybe I shouldn’t be so flip about it, but if you’d had to put up with that arrogant little prick as long as all of us who had the joy of working for him did, you’d probably feel like hoisting a few, too.”

“You may be right about that, and I guess I’m glad I didn’t have to put up with him. Either way, we’ve got other things to think about, and the courier’s leaving for Mesa tomorrow evening, so let’s go ahead and get the rest of your report out of the way.”

So we now know how high the Mesan penetration of the SLN has gone, that an MAlign operator is cementing his credentials with the Mandarins, AND that stirring up Verge systems in Manticore's name is a key part of the overall "dismember the League" strategy, as Helen Zilwicki thought, all the way back in Shadow Of Freedom.

Ugly. Wonder what happens next.
---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all
Top
Re: Firebrand's agenda...
Post by n7axw   » Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:09 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

SharkHunter wrote:Hate to wake up an old thread but just rediscovered this jaw droppng little set of tidbits:

--snipping--
stewart wrote:Harahap / Firebrand is an opportunist -- admitted in his unspoken comments to himself -- He was playing the best game available.

He can tell where he operated and where other operations (not his) occurred that he knows about, but in reality he is a local, tactical operator, NOT a strategic planner or manipulator.

-- Stewart
This is a Captain Gweon, "the head of one of ONI’s main sections" speaking:
A Rising Thunder, ch.31 wrote:...
"Frankly, if I were the Manties, I’d be doing everything I could to further disrupt the Protectorates. For that matter, I’d be stirring up all the unrest I could among the Office of Frontier Security’s…client states.”
Then we discover --bolding mine--
A Rising Thunder wrote:Gweon sensed her reaction and grimaced an apology... “Sorry, Erzi. Maybe I shouldn’t be so flip about it, but if you’d had to put up with that arrogant little prick as long as all of us who had the joy of working for him did, you’d probably feel like hoisting a few, too.”

“You may be right about that, and I guess I’m glad I didn’t have to put up with him. Either way, we’ve got other things to think about, and the courier’s leaving for Mesa tomorrow evening, so let’s go ahead and get the rest of your report out of the way.”

So we now know how high the Mesan penetration of the SLN has gone, that an MAlign operator is cementing his credentials with the Mandarins, AND that stirring up Verge systems in Manticore's name is a key part of the overall "dismember the League" strategy, as Helen Zilwicki thought, all the way back in Shadow Of Freedom.

Ugly. Wonder what happens next.


Yep, and Gweon planted a nice little seed implying that if anyone does stir the pot in the Verge, it has to be the Manties. Nice bit of misdirection.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Firebrand's agenda...
Post by looksbeforeheleaps   » Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:17 pm

looksbeforeheleaps
Lieutenant (Junior Grade)

Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:50 am

fallsfromtrees wrote:There is no reason for Harahap to worry about returned to Montana - he committed no crime there. He has promised Westman arms, but they were never actually delivered, and other than meeting with him a couple of times, had nothing to do with his operations (all of which were amnestied anyway). As far as being returned to Kornati, yes he arranged for arms for the FAK, but in fact, we have no textev that any of those arms were ever used in operations on Kornati. Most of them were destroyed in the raid on the training center, and the others scattered in small caches around the planet. While I am sure that Norbrandt did use some of those items, all of her operations prior to the delivery were from local resources, not the stuff that he supplied. If he agrees to help trap her, I suspect that he can arrange to walk, or at least get off with minimal incarceration, and he could prove invaluable as an asset in taking down OFS in the region, as he has a lot of knowledge about the resistance groups in the area, even those he wasn't actively encouraging.
Of course he committed crimes on both Montana and Kornati.

Unless the definition of conspiracy is significantly more restrictive in the Honorverse than it is here and now, it only requires an agreement to commit illegal acts and any specific action (not necessarily a criminal one) by any of the conspirators intended to further the goals of the conspiracy. As an example, sitting down with your friends and making a plan to rob a bank is not a conspiracy, but if any of you rent a car to use as a getaway vehicle as discussed, then it everyone who was part of the discussion is potentially guilty.

Given that Firebird specifically sought out and encouraged Westman and Norbrandt, he can probably be held legally responsible for every crime either of them committed.
Top
Re: Firebrand's agenda...
Post by Weird Harold   » Fri Apr 03, 2015 5:17 am

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

looksbeforeheleaps wrote:Given that Firebird specifically sought out and encouraged Westman and Norbrandt, he can probably be held legally responsible for every crime either of them committed.


At the time of Firebrand's involvement, Montana and Kornati were separate and distinct political entities. That would make Jurisdiction problematic for a multi-state conspiracy charge. Montana would have no right or reason to charge him with Norbrandt's crimes.

Now that both are part of the SEM, Firebrand has committed no crimes under Manticoran Law and still couldn't be charged with crimes against Kornati in Montana Courts or vice versa.

Not that he wouldn't be locked up for a long time if he were to fall into Manticoran hands, but it would be as a POW rather than "criminal consiracy."
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Firebrand's agenda...
Post by George J. Smith   » Fri Apr 03, 2015 9:46 am

George J. Smith
Commodore

Posts: 873
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:48 am
Location: Ross-on-Wye UK

Weird Harold wrote:
looksbeforeheleaps wrote:Given that Firebird specifically sought out and encouraged Westman and Norbrandt, he can probably be held legally responsible for every crime either of them committed.


At the time of Firebrand's involvement, Montana and Kornati were separate and distinct political entities. That would make Jurisdiction problematic for a multi-state conspiracy charge. Montana would have no right or reason to charge him with Norbrandt's crimes.

Now that both are part of the SEM, Firebrand has committed no crimes under Manticoran Law and still couldn't be charged with crimes against Kornati in Montana Courts or vice versa.

Not that he wouldn't be locked up for a long time if he were to fall into Manticoran hands, but it would be as a POW rather than "criminal consiracy."


I would think that the clause the peeps used to condemn Honor would be relevant and Firebrand would not be tried/convicted as a POW.
.
T&R
GJS

A man should live forever, or die in the attempt
Spider Robinson Callahan's Crosstime Saloon (1977) A voice is heard in Ramah
Top
Re: Firebrand's agenda...
Post by Bill Woods   » Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:02 pm

Bill Woods
Captain of the List

Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:39 pm

Weird Harold wrote:
looksbeforeheleaps wrote:Given that Firebird specifically sought out and encouraged Westman and Norbrandt, he can probably be held legally responsible for every crime either of them committed.

At the time of Firebrand's involvement, Montana and Kornati were separate and distinct political entities. That would make Jurisdiction problematic for a multi-state conspiracy charge. Montana would have no right or reason to charge him with Norbrandt's crimes.

Now that both are part of the SEM, Firebrand has committed no crimes under Manticoran Law and still couldn't be charged with crimes against Kornati in Montana Courts or vice versa.

Not that he wouldn't be locked up for a long time if he were to fall into Manticoran hands, but it would be as a POW rather than "criminal consiracy."
I don't think Norbrandt's crimes get wiped off the books just because Kornati is not longer an independent state. But if they get him, the Manties might make a deal for a complete account of the planets he's worked on, everything he knows about the Malign, etc.
----
Imagined conversation:
Admiral [noting yet another Manty tech surprise]:
XO, what's the budget for the ONI?
Vice Admiral: I don't recall exactly, sir. Several billion quatloos.
Admiral: ... What do you suppose they did with all that money?
Top
Re: Firebrand's agenda...
Post by Weird Harold   » Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:20 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

George J. Smith wrote:I would think that the clause the peeps used to condemn Honor would be relevant and Firebrand would not be tried/convicted as a POW.


The Deneb Accords wouldn't really apply because Firebrand wasn't working for a signatory of those accords. He'd be imprisoned as a POW or tried for his association with Norbrandt in local Kornati courts. He just couldn't be tried for crimes against Montana at the same time because he didn't actually commit anything there.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Firebrand's agenda...
Post by thinkstoomuch   » Fri Apr 03, 2015 2:12 pm

thinkstoomuch
Admiral

Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: United States of America

Weird Harold wrote:The Deneb Accords wouldn't really apply because Firebrand wasn't working for a signatory of those accords. He'd be imprisoned as a POW or tried for his association with Norbrandt in local Kornati courts. He just couldn't be tried for crimes against Montana at the same time because he didn't actually commit anything there.


Probably an incredibly stupid question.

But didn't a pinnace load of "Manties" get blown up by his schedule to supply arms? That freighter would never have been there or for that matter or the RMN CA(L) for that matter without his involvement.

I really do hate most law questions as nothing ever as simple as it seems.

Enjoy,
T2M
-----------------------
Q: “How can something be worth more than it costs? Isn’t everything ‘worth’ what it costs?”
A: “No. That’s just the price. ...
Christopher Anvil from Top Line in "War Games"
Top
Re: Firebrand's agenda...
Post by George J. Smith   » Fri Apr 03, 2015 2:16 pm

George J. Smith
Commodore

Posts: 873
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:48 am
Location: Ross-on-Wye UK

Weird Harold wrote:
George J. Smith wrote:I would think that the clause the peeps used to condemn Honor would be relevant and Firebrand would not be tried/convicted as a POW.


The Deneb Accords wouldn't really apply because Firebrand wasn't working for a signatory of those accords. He'd be imprisoned as a POW or tried for his association with Norbrandt in local Kornati courts. He just couldn't be tried for crimes against Montana at the same time because he didn't actually commit anything there.


I think Under UK anti-terrorism laws he could be tried for conspiracy to commit, however as all of his "fellow" conspirators were pardoned, it would be a bit much to not pardon him as well. However if the Montanans had only been pardoned for the acts they actually committed then to try Firebrand for conspiracy to commit terrorism would mean that the Montanans would also have to be tried for conspiracy to commit.

Of course I don't know what Montanan anti-terrorism laws are.
.
T&R
GJS

A man should live forever, or die in the attempt
Spider Robinson Callahan's Crosstime Saloon (1977) A voice is heard in Ramah
Top
Re: Firebrand's agenda...
Post by Kizarvexis   » Fri Apr 03, 2015 2:44 pm

Kizarvexis
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:18 pm

George J. Smith wrote:
Weird Harold wrote:
The Deneb Accords wouldn't really apply because Firebrand wasn't working for a signatory of those accords. He'd be imprisoned as a POW or tried for his association with Norbrandt in local Kornati courts. He just couldn't be tried for crimes against Montana at the same time because he didn't actually commit anything there.


I think Under UK anti-terrorism laws he could be tried for conspiracy to commit, however as all of his "fellow" conspirators were pardoned, it would be a bit much to not pardon him as well. However if the Montanans had only been pardoned for the acts they actually committed then to try Firebrand for conspiracy to commit terrorism would mean that the Montanans would also have to be tried for conspiracy to commit.

Of course I don't know what Montanan anti-terrorism laws are.


The Manties would not try Firebrand for the acts that Steve Westman committed, but for the actions of the Jessyk owned freighter Maryanne which killed a Manty pinnace. You would consider them two conspiracies. Yes, it would be thread bare, but since Firebrand had not delivered the weapons to the MIM yet, I think a Montana jury would go along with it.
Top

Return to Honorverse