Hi BobfromSidney,
Are you serious?
The fact that the SL has already invaded SEM territory twice besides invading a member system, ie Beowulf's twice as well is somehow akin to a sneak attack?
Just because those invasions failed, the GA should ignore them?
Or that the attack solely on Sol's military assets will likely be only after the other anchorages have been destroyed as fair warning and then only if Sol doesn't get rid of the evident "scrap" first?
Right!
Regarding the SL somehow getting its act together in 20-50 years, your argument using the US is quite off.
First, find the textev that the SL will survive even 5 years.
I'd be willing to wait quite a while, but because I know you can't, I won't.
The primary problem with your analogy is that the Sollie's don't see themselves as Sollie's but as Beowulfers or Terrans etc first, just as the southern confederacy's problem was that their states had first place in their allegiance; not the confederacy, not the south, not the war effort.
Which is one reason Jefferson Davis said "the south died of state's rights".
Then there is all the textev from CoS [2003] on regarding various observers seeing the SL collapsing rather soon of its own weight and incompetence; the economic preferences given to the core systems by the mandarins which have ticked off the far larger shell, that the looting of the protectorates can't continue infinitely [what happens when the ex-protectorate members outnumber the non?]; the widespread popularity of Barregos and Rozsak as reformers against the nameless bureaucracy; nor that a quarter of the EC voted with Beowulf despite all the bribes and systemic corruption on Terra, who probably represent more like a third of the member systems, and are even more likely to have their own hyper warships in their SDF's than not; besides the SL apparently being riddled with lots of MAlign agents who're dedicated to the SL's quick destruction yet are not somehow going to finish their jobs?
Ri-ight!
OTOH, I think we may see signs of some SL members are willing to quit the SL and join the GA just from observing Lacoon 1 & 2; not any particular military action, but just the simple economic castration the SL didn't see coming, indicating its arrogant dangerous stupidity that had created the situation in the first place among other things.
For the 2/3 of the SL that rely only on LAC's in their SDF's, the repeated demonstration of GA military superiority will encourage many to seek out the GA as a new protector; one that opposes the OFS etc, indeed supports the RA's 6 pillars [CoS], and so will be far more popular locally than Sollie bureaucrats NTM more equitable in its relationship.
I suspect simply getting rid of the OFS will gain the GA a lot of support throughout the SL, NTM the protectorates and verge, or how many FF defectors who're tired of doing the OFS's killing etc.
How long before the tales of Mobius and Meyers begin to mount and swell, from a molehill to a mountain as other protectorates seek help?
Granted the GA are the good guys, but where is the textev for the SL having a chance of surviving in anything like its present size or capability, let alone 5 years from now?
Given how outclassed the SL is, I'd think all the SL survivor supporters would want RFC to clear the decks so as to get a foe who stands a chance of making it interesting, but they appear to prefer delaying the inevitable for as long as possible.
Go figure.
If it'd be boring for RFC to write it, how long will it take, let alone what will reading it feel like?
L
[quote="BobfromSydney"][quote="lyonheart"]
Taking out Hyperion One and LogCom, both very military targets, after the attack on Beowulf but going no further into Sol should be more than acceptable to any rational observer.
[/quote]
Under that logic it could be argued Japan taking out Pearl Harbour should be more than acceptable to any rational observer as well.
Or Thunderbolt was acceptable to the Manticore's leadership or citizenry.
Even if the Solarian League surrendered, the GA would not necessarily get what it wanted - in 20-50 years time the SL would get its act together and come after them with the REAL mother of all fleets.
Flipping it around:
Imagine the typical scenario where dictator ABC in some foreign country does something despicable or threatening and the U.S. launches an air strike and loses a few planes (and pilots). Some of the pilots survive but become POWs. How does public opinion stand? Some are for the war, some are against the war, many are indifferent.
Now dictator ABC uses a submarine (or whatever) to drop a few cruise missiles on the pentagon, or torpedoes Norfolk naval station. Was that a good move for dictator ABC? Where does public opinion stand now?
I think most of us hardcore fans are also wargamers of some stripe and can easily fall into the wargame mentality of the winner being the player with the most points on the board or destroys the most enemy units at the end of the game.
The size disparity between the GA and the SL means that the SL is an enemy that cannot be defeated by conventional means. In fact they need to change the 'enemy' status and end the conflict as friends of the league's member systems, if not the league itself.
Regarding the Solarian POWs:
Absolutely don't release them until the GA achieves its goals!
Maybe a fleeting morsel of goodwill would be gained by releasing them, but the downsides in terms of propaganda and leverage would dwarf that goodwill by a large measure.
Every day those POWs spend in captivity damages the SL, Mandarins and SLN. Furthermore war is an uncertain thing. It is not inconceivable that GA personnel (uniformed or otherwise) may get captured at some stage in the conflict. Not having prisoners to exchange compromises the GA's ability to A) Get their prisoners back and B) Ensure 'Geneva Convention' treatment of their own.[/quote]