Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests

Grayson orbital industry.

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Grayson orbital industry.
Post by Vince   » Sun Mar 01, 2015 11:03 am

Vince
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:43 pm

SharkHunter wrote:--snipping--
SWM wrote:...
Grayson had mining operations out in the comets. They had access to plenty of CHNO.
On a tonnage basis, probably so, plus elemental hydrogen from Uriel. But you can bet that the best source is still planetary simply based on "freighter down with foodstuffs, freighter back up with "food fuel". Even if that food fuel is mostly in the form of gadzooks worth of frozen CO2. vs. chasing down and mining comets. I'd imagine that over a period of time, the Grayson's "agricultural commission" will have figured out what major elements are needed in what amounts(calcium being likely a major one) and the potash bunch, etc. that they need for the space born farms that isn't being um, spread by the orbiting cows..., and replenish that from best sources, asteroid, orbital, processed sewage, chicken eggshells, or whatever. Nature sort of takes care of the rest if the humans get those balances within strike range of optimally correct.

A couple of points:

First, the ton down, ton up problem was identified and solved as far back as Robert A. Heinlein's The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress. Echoes of Honor, Chapter 33 refers specifically to the so-called "Heinlein Maneuver" being carried out during "the Lunar Revolt of 39 a.d.", which was developed in The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress, so RAH's book must have survived.

Second, Alice Truman reported:
Echoes of Honor, Chapter 3 wrote:But Grayson—and, for that matter, Yeltsin's asteroid belts, as well—are lousy in heavy metals . . . and fissionables.
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes.
Top
Re: Grayson orbital industry.
Post by tlb   » Sun Mar 01, 2015 11:09 am

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4442
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

Weird Harold wrote:
SWM wrote:As for the rest of that, people already said that the organisms and such can come from the other existing orbital farms. Only the first farm needs to have that stuff decontaminated and hauled from the surface.


There is also the point that "soil" from asteroids, comets, and other orbital habitats doesn't need decontamination; anything lifted from the planet does need decontamination.

Whatever chemical transformations are required to turn CHON into fertilizer, soil, and habitat structure would be small potatoes when compared to the cost of decontaminating and lifting the same elements from the surface.

The question I have (in line with the recent post from Vince), is why wouldn't the material from asteroids need decontamination? Is the planet abnormal compared to its system or is it more likely that the entire system is loaded with heavier metals?
Top
Re: Grayson orbital industry.
Post by SWM   » Sun Mar 01, 2015 1:05 pm

SWM
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5928
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: U.S. east coast

tlb wrote:The question I have (in line with the recent post from Vince), is why wouldn't the material from asteroids need decontamination? Is the planet abnormal compared to its system or is it more likely that the entire system is loaded with heavier metals?

Material from the comets and chondritic asteroids won't need decontamination, because they are mostly composed of lighter elements. The text indicates that the asteroids in general have lots of heavy elements, but that is probably concentrated on the metallic asteroids rather than the stony asteroids.
--------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine
Top
Re: Grayson orbital industry.
Post by George J. Smith   » Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:13 pm

George J. Smith
Commodore

Posts: 873
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:48 am
Location: Ross-on-Wye UK

Brigade XO wrote:snip... Human sewage (processed or not) would be a reasonable source of that material. You would have to process it at some point, if for nothing more than to kill pathogens that would othewise infect your growing medium (both hydroponic and "dirt" on the farms.

snip...
I can't imagine a place like Grayson just taking millions of tons of the raw sewage and dumping it out into un-domed places. They really do need a place to put it. They have to work too hard to decontaminate planitary materials in the first place to throw away or recontaminate (with Grayson heavy metals etc) "human effluent". :)


I would assume that human waste is recycled on the planet, after all there is textev that they recycle the "dead" to maintain their farms.
.
T&R
GJS

A man should live forever, or die in the attempt
Spider Robinson Callahan's Crosstime Saloon (1977) A voice is heard in Ramah
Top
Re: Grayson orbital industry.
Post by SharkHunter   » Sun Mar 01, 2015 3:58 pm

SharkHunter
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:53 pm
Location: Independence, Missouri

George J. Smith wrote:
Brigade XO wrote:snip... Human sewage (processed or not) would be a reasonable source of that material. You would have to process it at some point, if for nothing more than to kill pathogens that would othewise infect your growing medium (both hydroponic and "dirt" on the farms.

snip...
I can't imagine a place like Grayson just taking millions of tons of the raw sewage and dumping it out into un-domed places. They really do need a place to put it. They have to work too hard to decontaminate planitary materials in the first place to throw away or recontaminate (with Grayson heavy metals etc) "human effluent". :)


I would assume that human waste is recycled on the planet, after all there is textev that they recycle the "dead" to maintain their farms.
My assumption also, but if you look at major sewage recycling nowadays, the newest "seage treatment plants" AD 20XX use the zeolite formations to purify the sewage, PLUS they "farm the methane" that evaporates out of the effluent. Given the need to "contain" the atmosphere on Grayson to prevent heavy metal recontaminants from reentering a "cleaned up supply", plus the new sky domes, I'd assume that extraction to be a major source of both carbon and hydrogen as heating fuel, etc. Burned planetarily (think: gas fireplaces, furnaces, etc.) and you now have plenty of extractable CO2 for the orbital farms, and purified water for whatever uses, balancing consumption requirements rather nicely.
---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all
Top
Re: Grayson orbital industry.
Post by Bill Woods   » Sun Mar 01, 2015 4:02 pm

Bill Woods
Captain of the List

Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:39 pm

tlb wrote:
Weird Harold wrote:There is also the point that "soil" from asteroids, comets, and other orbital habitats doesn't need decontamination; anything lifted from the planet does need decontamination.

Whatever chemical transformations are required to turn CHON into fertilizer, soil, and habitat structure would be small potatoes when compared to the cost of decontaminating and lifting the same elements from the surface.

The question I have (in line with the recent post from Vince), is why wouldn't the material from asteroids need decontamination? Is the planet abnormal compared to its system or is it more likely that the entire system is loaded with heavier metals?

By the time you've processed asteroids into usable stuff, you've got fairly pure materials. A big pile of iron or nickel-iron, smaller piles of silicates and other things. The various heavy metals are produced and used.
----
Imagined conversation:
Admiral [noting yet another Manty tech surprise]:
XO, what's the budget for the ONI?
Vice Admiral: I don't recall exactly, sir. Several billion quatloos.
Admiral: ... What do you suppose they did with all that money?
Top

Return to Honorverse