kzt wrote:The need for a single decapitation strike makes sense.
However, what is the effective difference between (to make up some numbers) a 15 meter wide wedge traveling 15 km from the ground to an air target at 5km up and a similar 15 meter wide wedge traveling through roughly similar atmospheric volume from space to the ground? It would seem that if A is acceptable, B should be fine too, or if B is unacceptable, why is A allowed?
Earth's atmosphere is about 400 kilometers deep, with about 80% of it concentrated within --- what? 16 km or so of the planetary surface? A wedge moving through atmosphere has nasty effects on the atmosphere; the atmosphere also has nasty effects on the object doing the moving. The wedges used on SAMs are
very small and
very short-lived. I don't know where you got your "15 meter wide" from. The strike on Honor's pinnace in
FIE destroyed only about 10 meters of its nose, IIRC, which should certainly suggest to you that the wedge is smaller than 15 meters. An impeller-wedge SAM is a
short ranged anti-air missile, especially in atmosphere, with about a launch range of about 4-5 km, about the same as a present day Stinger MANPAD. Even the heavier, tripod-version Usher used in
SVW has a maximum ceiling of no more than about 7 km, which is one heck of a lot less than the 16 km of fairly dense atmosphere a wedge would have to penetrate for an orbit-to-surface KEW strike.
kzt wrote:And yes, I still think the tactics used were idiotic in CoG. (And the first attack was presented as run by idiots, so that is fine.) They were not trying to capture the building intact or rescue anyone, they were trying to eliminate a somewhat isolated (isolated as in it wasn't closely surrounded by sensitive sites) strongpoint and preferably with the death or capture of all the defenders. Plasma cannon and small wedges appear ideally suited to do this with a minimal loss of life on the the attackers side by causing progressive structural collapse from standoff range. I just don't see any reason stated why reducing the complex to a 50 meter high pile of fist sized debris wouldn't have been a totally acceptable outcome, and that appears to be well within the capabilities of the military force using just their organic capabilities.
Launching wave after wave of troops into a meat grinder does not seem like an ideal way to remove the strongpoint, nor does it appear to be particularly fast or cost effective. It seems like an approach that has no particular redeeming value. However it was apparently the only option considered after "nuking it from orbit" was rejected.
It was a well written part of the book, but the motivation for why they would pursue such a hugely expensive course of action after deciding it wasn't going to be easy eludes me. After all, this wasn't the only such structure on the planet (and clearly wasn't the only one that the government had recently faced aggressive resistance from and therefore there was unlikely to be the last) and the military was pretty darn small, so getting a rather large percentage of your military rendered combat ineffectual with the first operation undertaken presents certain obvious issues.
Political direction was most responsible for the conduct of the operation. The on-site commander wanted to break the building down to rubble around the defenders' ears; she was denied that option. The ability of plasma cannon to bring the entire structure to the ground is not as great as you seem to be assuming. Plasma cannon are "sized" to do certain things, and they didn't happen to have a "Destroy Tower, Mark One" version on hand. They had infantry-sized weapons, the "Stinger-equivalent" SAMs, and a few different sizes of vehicle mounted weapons, but even the heaviest of those weapons were the Honorverse equivalent of 155mm howitzers, not 16" guns, and that tower was a
very hard target. You're not going to bring down the Sears Tower in Chicago with the main guns of Abrams tanks in a hurry, and this was a
vastly larger and much broader target, relatively speaking (and one which might as well have been built as a military bunker the size of a small mountain from the outset). In the Honoverse, if you need a bigger nutcracker than your equivalent of a 155 mm howitzer, then you go out and get a KEW, which is the equivalent of anything from a 16" gun to a 40,000-lb bomb to a tactical nuke to a
strategic nuke, and happens to be cheap and so procurable in largish numbers. Why invest in a lot of other, much more expensive hardware to do the same job from the
bottom of the gravity well? Sure, in this case that would have turned out to be a good thing to have, but under normal circumstances, you're not going to need it, and Drescher got caught out by the Gods of the Procurement Branch.
As to why she then continued to launch attacks into the "meat grinder" (as you so aptly put it), she was under orders from the same political leaders who'd denied her the requested KEW strikes to get in and shut down the opposition ASAP. She thought the orders were stupid and tried her damnedest to get them changed, but her political masters refused. So if you want to call the attacks idiotic or moronic in
that respect, I have no disagreement with you. If you want to call her tactics
within the constraints artificially imposed upon her stupid or moronic, we have a problem, Houston,