cthia wrote:Jonathan_S wrote:Though ships do need to have their sails up to transit. So that's a couple hundred km radius disc sticking out perpendicular from their hulls.
However the emergence lane's grav effects are probably around 25,000 km across (and 90,000 km long) so there's still lots of volume to put ships side by side even if they do need to stay hundreds of km apart.
And that would comprise a significant amount of area where missiles and mines would fear to tread.
I still think such an unorthodox attack along with taking out specific forts by an imploding bomb or nanite infection will do the trick. Then the LDs can remain hidden behind the junction playing cat and mouse with any other fort trying to work its way to the rescue. As soon as a fort pokes its head around the junction on the negative hemisphere, it gets destroyed. Remember, the LDs would still be hidden. It would be the same cat and mouse tactic at play Theisman used around Blackbird. And, sending probes around the junction as a tactic my niece suggested Honor should have used to detect Theisman wouldn't work. I'm betting they won't detect the LDs, and their wedges won't work anyway.
Well yes, missiles and mines do "fear to tread" within the roughly 90,000 X 25,000 km emergence zone - because the grav shear will destroy them before they could penetrate very far.
There's a reasons that missiles with contact nukes or even the early burn heads weren't considered for initial defense against a hostile transit - the grav shear in the arrival lane would destroy them before they could reach effective range of their target. So a minefield can't be laid within the arrival lane. However antiship mines in the Honoverse are mostly standoff laserhead devices and, like laserhead missiles, their 30,000 - 50,000 standoff range allows them to engage targets at the heart of the emergence zone from outside the grav shear effects. So you can have a minefield positioned along the flanks of the emergence zone's cylinder. And, in fact, we know from OBS that during time of war there will be such mines and they will automatically engage anything without the correct IFF signal.
Also fort isn't likely to "pokes its head around the junction on the negative hemisphere" - there are shells of forts permanently stationed on all sides of the Junction - in order to ward off hostile approach through normal space from any direction. You'd need to destroy all the forts over something like 60% of the sphere of Junction space to deny the remaining ones a direct line of sight around the Junction to all approach vectors.
And that still doesn't help that much because there's no evidence that the terminii themselves obscure, distort, or block electromagnetic signals. (Though they probably do screw up the signal to noise ratio for grav sensors - but those are already the least likely way to detect an LD)
Blowing up a few forts isn't going to let you sneak in and use the junction for cover to play hide and seek with the remaining forts.
Also, I think you've overstating how big an obstruction the Junction is. Sure the area within the hyper limit is vast - up to 4,188,790,204,786,390,000 cubic km. But the grav shear areas, where wedge are fatal and you can't lay a mine, are an infinitesimal part of that (that only the seven 90,000 x 25,000 km emergency zone cylinders); about 0.029% of the Junction.
So you can absolutely send a recon drone into the Junction area as long as you avoid that 3/1000ths of a percent of its volume.