Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests
Re: GA response to SL attempts to prevent seccessions | |
---|---|
by kenl511 » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:01 pm | |
kenl511
Posts: 353
|
Is there a text copy of the SL Constitution available? We are arguing over a process that requires specifics and arguing using generalities.
|
Top |
Re: GA response to SL attempts to prevent seccessions | |
---|---|
by kenl511 » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:14 pm | |
kenl511
Posts: 353
|
The Solarian League does not declare war.
The Peoples Republic of Haven does not declare war. Hmm, sounds like some historical examples. Adolf Hitler declared war on only one opponent. |
Top |
Re: GA response to SL attempts to prevent seccessions | |
---|---|
by kzt » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:22 pm | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
David cleverly doesn't not provide this sort of thing until and unless the plot requires it. So I doubt there is a full version even in his notes. |
Top |
Re: GA response to SL attempts to prevent seccessions | |
---|---|
by Theemile » Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:14 pm | |
Theemile
Posts: 5241
|
David has done everything possible to feed our appetite WITHOUT painting himself into corners. What he has fed us has caused a couple retcons over the years, as the story plays out. So he writes and releases just what is necessary for the story at that point, so if a later story point requires something different than earlier mentioned, he can easily slip it in. If he were smart, he would release all his side notes as an omnibus edition after he is finished with the Honorverse. ******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships." |
Top |
Re: GA response to SL attempts to prevent seccessions | |
---|---|
by Loren Pechtel » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:34 pm | |
Loren Pechtel
Posts: 1324
|
Why do you think they would need legal justification? They're not paying attention the law anyway. |
Top |
Re: GA response to SL attempts to prevent seccessions | |
---|---|
by kzt » Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:43 pm | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
People deciding to ignore the law almost always ensure their acts are clothed in some sort of legal justification, though perhaps a somewhat twisted view of the law Like the enabling act, or say broadly reinterpreting a law directed against the mafia to somehow apply to anyone the government decides is today's villain, or say deciding via secret court that collecting the phone conversations of every person in a large country is perfectly OK. |
Top |
Re: GA response to SL attempts to prevent seccessions | |
---|---|
by ldwechsler » Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:38 am | |
ldwechsler
Posts: 1235
|
[quote="kzt]
Why do you think they would need legal justification? They're not paying attention the law anyway People deciding to ignore the law almost always ensure their acts are clothed in some sort of legal justification, though perhaps a somewhat twisted view of the law Like the enabling act, or say broadly reinterpreting a law directed against the mafia to somehow apply to anyone the government decides is today's villain, or say deciding via secret court that collecting the phone conversations of every person in a large country is perfectly OK.[/quote] Actually, the UN Charter is the best example of all of this. No one really quotes it and they do damned well what they please. Their committee on the status of women has been headed at times by countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran. Their peacekeepers have been notorious for rape and the spread of disease. International law is coming down to the democratic votes of the most psychopathic people on the planet. Why should the Solarian League be different? Frankly, I would bet the original document interplanetary expansion was based on was the United Nations Charter. |
Top |
Re: GA response to SL attempts to prevent seccessions | |
---|---|
by cthia » Sun Aug 20, 2017 10:56 am | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Absolutely Theemile. I suggested that very same thing. Sort of a "behind the scenes," or "the making of," kind of thing that movies do and include as a bonus, replete with deleted scenes, alternate endings etc., etc. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: GA response to SL attempts to prevent seccessions | |
---|---|
by cthia » Sun Aug 20, 2017 2:07 pm | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
This should go in the Ramifications of absorbing fractured League systems? thread I just created as well, but I think it belongs here even more.
If I were the League, just as soon as a system "defects," I'd put the word out to every large fricking pirate enterprise, mom&pop operation or lone wolves that I can find alerting them that System X no longer enjoys League status or protection. And that pirates have a green light to take to flight. If I were the League, I would encourage the new Robin Hoods. "Steal from the poor and get rich!" I certainly wouldn't allow them to secede under the radar of pirates. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: GA response to SL attempts to prevent seccessions | |
---|---|
by Fox2! » Sun Aug 20, 2017 3:12 pm | |
Fox2!
Posts: 925
|
So you have six weeks to six months until somebody pops a Manty merchanter. And six weeks after that for a half squadron of RMN DDs or a pair of CLs (or even CAs) show up, and as Leto Atriedes said after taking office on Arrakis, "Our Sublime Padishah Emperor has ordered me to assume control and settle all disputes". |
Top |