Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 41 guests

The Problem with Haven

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: The Problem with Haven
Post by lyonheart   » Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:38 am

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi Hanuman,

Some of Giancola's tricks included just shifting the punctuation, and again completely changing the meaning.

As I recall, Grosclaude had set up a code clerk to take the blame when Giancola was ready to go public and solve the crisis in his attempt to replace Eloise by extra legal means.

L


hanuman wrote:**quote="Weird Harold"**[quote="hanuman"]Correct me if I'm mistaken, but it wasn't Haven's correspondence that Giancola altered. He changed Manticore's correspondence once it got to him, BEFORE he presented it to Pritchart and the rest of the cabinet. **quote**

It was both. Especially the last message where he removed "one little three letter word" which changed the message from "Trevor's Star is NOT included" to "Trevor's Star is included."


Ahh! Thank you for clarifying that.[/quote]
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: The Problem with Haven
Post by hanuman   » Sat Jun 28, 2014 6:07 am

hanuman
Captain of the List

Posts: 643
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 3:47 pm

[quote="lyonheart"]Hi Hanuman,

Some of Giancola's tricks included just shifting the punctuation, and again completely changing the meaning.

As I recall, Grosclaude had set up a code clerk to take the blame when Giancola was ready to go public and solve the crisis in his attempt to replace Eloise by extra legal means.

L


Ah, thank you for that, Lyonheart. Much appreciated.
Top
Re: The Problem with Haven
Post by DarkEnigma   » Sat Jun 28, 2014 11:33 am

DarkEnigma
Ensign

Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 11:23 pm
Location: San Francisco

I was all set to let this thread die and move on (I swear!), but one of the quotes in the "Honorverse Favorite Passages" thread crystallized one final point in my brain. It isn't really an argument: more an observation.

We have gone over the events which lead to the formation of the Grand Alliance with a fine-toothed comb, and for the most part, every issue myself and others have brought up does have a plausible reasoning behind it. However, when you string them all together, things start to seem perhaps a bit too convenient.

1) Haven's economy recovers such that the impetus which drove it into conquest is absent and thus allows Haven to end the war without suffering catastrophic collapse (as well as fund their triumphant return to parity militarily with Manticore).

2) High Ridge seizes power and promptly accepts Saint-Just's offer of cease-fire with all out victory only weeks away (He does this despite the opportunity to be the Prime Minister who "won the war" and co-opt decades of Cromarty's hard work. The people of Manticore accept his decision and do not feel that this is a disrespect to the men and women who lost their lives in the war).

3) Haven had Bolthole, primed with raw materials, engineers, supply chain, funding, et cetera which put them in prime position to capitalize on High Ridge's rank stupidity in very short order.

4) Pritchart, for whatever combination of reasons, starts down a path of increasingly aggressive stances towards Manticore which quickly (predictably?) gets out of hand.

5) Despite Haven killing her father and her Prime Minister, despite knowing Haven manipulated correspondence, despite the assassination attempts on Torch and Old Terra (et cetera, et cetera), Queen Elizabeth gives up the opportunity to finish off Haven twice and allows herself to be talked into letting Haven off the hook after Buttercup, and again after Gendelsbane, and again after the Battle of Manticore.

6) After being largely politically apathetic under the Legislaturalists, and learning to distrust their central government under the Committee for Public Safety, the people of Haven quickly rally behind and become positively engaged in the new Republic despite its unproven and fragile nature.

7) After the Legislaturalists and the CPS both meet their demise at the point of a gun, Manticoran leaders are quickly convinced that that won't happen to the new Republic despite its unproven and fragile nature.

8) The people of both Haven and Manticore are ready and willing to bury the hatchet when their leaders deem it is time to do so.

There are probably other lynchpins that I am missing but I think you can see my point. As I said before, each of these has a plausible explanation, and, when looked at in isolation, makes perfect sense. However, If any of the links in this chain did not exist, Haven and Manticore probably do not end up bosom buddies (or at least not nearly as quickly).

I suppose that my major complaint is that, overall, the transition of Haven from bitter enemy to ally feels contrived. There is an overall sense that the events are not "organic" but rather that people and events are shoehorned towards a predestined conclusion IMHO. I hope you will believe me when I say that the preceding post was not borne of sour grapes but rather an attempt to express genuine opinion.

P.S. The quote which got me thinking about all this was this one:

cthia wrote:Regarding the reason of why Elizabeth should trust Eloise is echoed in this passage...

A Rising Thunder
“Oh, I’m not worried about that.”

Elizabeth waved one hand. She and Pritchart had discussed the president’s concerns in detail, and the empress was convinced the other woman was worrying unduly. Yes, the Battle of Manticore had killed an enormous number of people, but far fewer than the Yawata Strike, and all of them had been military casualties. Unlike the people behind the Yawata Strike, the Republic had scrupulously avoided preventable civilian casualties. After fifteen T-years fighting the People’s Republic, even the most anti-Havenite Manticoran had been only too well aware of what a change that represented, and the contrast with the slaughter of the Yawata Strike only underscored the difference. Say what the most bigoted Manticoran might, the restored Republic had fought its war with honor, and the majority of Manticorans knew it.


The reason this passage clicked something in my brain is because it feels a bit too determinative. There is a hint of "because I said so" behind every sentence. People can often be irrationally emotional after all (honorably conducted or not, after Grendelsbane, the Battle of Manticore, et cetera Manticorans would have some justification for residual resentments).

The real world is often messy and people are often unpredictable which sometimes leads to less-than-perfect outcomes despite the best of intentions. The events which put Manticore and Haven on the fast-track to BFF status, however, feel just a bit contrived overall. It is, however, the only issue of consequence in this very lengthy series which strikes me so. IMHO. YMMV.
Top
Re: The Problem with Haven
Post by Howard T. Map-addict   » Sat Jun 28, 2014 11:58 am

Howard T. Map-addict
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:47 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Yes, that is what novelists, and all storytellers, do.
That is why Eric Flint says "all novelists are liars."
Usually, the novelist/liar makes us like it.

However, if you for one cannot like it,
then I suggest that you read Euclid's Elements.
It is guaranteed to contain no lies (although it does
have some unwarrented assumptions!).

HTM

DarkEnigma wrote:[snip - htm]
for the most part, every issue I and others have
brought up does have a plausible reasoning behind it.
However, when you string them all together,
things start to seem perhaps a bit too convenient.
[big snip - htm]
Top
Re: The Problem with Haven
Post by PalmerSperry   » Sat Jun 28, 2014 12:41 pm

PalmerSperry
Commander

Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:25 pm

DarkEnigma wrote:2) High Ridge seizes power and promptly accepts Saint-Just's offer of cease-fire with all out victory only weeks away (He does this despite the opportunity to be the Prime Minister who "won the war" and co-opt decades of Cromarty's hard work. The people of Manticore accept his decision and do not feel that this is a disrespect to the men and women who lost their lives in the war).


High Ridge no more "seized" power than Gordon Brown did in in the UK in 2007. He was the person who could most command the support of the House of Commons, and was thus Prime Minister. And whilst it's true he could've continued the war and demonstrably won, it would've been winning by continuing Cromarty's policies ... Whereas if it wins diplomatically (which he can afford to try, because it'll be ages until Haven can match Manticore's technology thus meaning he can go back to fighting if he needs to), he can show that Cromarty's approach was wrong all along and that Haven could've been "reasoned with" earlier thus saving countless lives on both sides ...

And what where the people of Manticore supposed to do anyway? Organise a coup on the basis that the legitimate government wasn't doing things the way some of them wanted? (Hardly the basis of a sane & stable government - every time you make a decision you'll annoy somebody, and not making any decisions is in and of itself a decision!)

Now I'm sure there where many people who didn't like what he was doing, but I'm equally sure there where those who thought that Manticore had won and that it was all over bar the shouting - "We should stop trying to produce a final peace treaty and just go back to killing people" isn't a winning sound bite for most people.
Top
Re: The Problem with Haven
Post by MaxxQ   » Sat Jun 28, 2014 12:46 pm

MaxxQ
BuNine

Posts: 1553
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:08 pm
Location: Greer, South Carolina USA

PalmerSperry wrote:
<snip>

(Hardly the basis of a sane & stable government - every time you make a decision you'll annoy somebody, and not making any decisions is in and of itself a decision!)


If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice - Rush, Freewill

:mrgreen: Sorry... just *had* to do it.
Top
Re: The Problem with Haven
Post by KNick   » Sat Jun 28, 2014 6:20 pm

KNick
Admiral

Posts: 2142
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:38 am
Location: Billings, MT, USA

DarkEnigma wrote:<<SNIP>>
7) After the Legislaturalists and the CPS both meet their demise at the point of a gun, Manticoran leaders are quickly convinced that that won't happen to the new Republic despite its unproven and fragile nature.

8) The people of both Haven and Manticore are ready and willing to bury the hatchet when their leaders deem it is time to do so.
<<SNIP>>
.


One of the reasons the people of Haven were willing to give the new Republic some breathing room happened completely "off screen". The trials of all the StateSec individuals who were brought to trial, convicted, and/or executed/imprisoned. Pritchard and LePic spent most of the cease fire chasing down and arresting those StateSec members that they could build a case against. Yet the only mention of this is Kevin's rumination about the kill-switches built into their cells. At the same time, we see Theisman and the RHN chasing down and fighting those who managed to escape to set up their own private planets. The fact that the new government was willing to go to such lengths to prosecute the offenders that ran the previous regime using all the legal means at their disposal to publicly punish the offenders was a big plus for the new government.

Add to that the fact that the RHN's "bogey man", the Salamander, had come to Haven to negotiate a peace treaty without even arranging for a cease fire first. The public debates in the Senate would have been closely followed by the public. So would the "insider leaks" that surely accompanied the talks. Most of the people of Haven would have realized she was negotiating from a position of overwhelming strength, but she was not looking for a punitive treaty, but a relatively fair end to hostilities. Then she suddenly left without immediate explanation, but also without trashing the system, leaving the door open for future negotiations. In fact she left without so much as a formal cease fire agreement but she obviously left the informal cease fire in effect. All of this would be in the forefront of the people's minds when Cachet and Zilwiki dropped their own bombshell on them.
_


Try to take a fisherman's fish and you will be tomorrows bait!!!
Top
Re: The Problem with Haven
Post by lyonheart   » Sun Jun 29, 2014 12:44 am

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi DarkEnigma,

No I don't think you want to bury this right now, so in answer to your points, consider the following:

1) This has been answered repeatedly, but did you read the pearls or RFC 's comments?

Given the republic has succeeded at whatever cost to build one of the two most powerful navies in existence in just a few years after being faced with military defeat without foreign help, ought to indicate the power of the republic's now unfettered economy, yet you keep missing all the clues.

2) Looking at the number of countries currently putting up with 'presidents' etc who have violated their local constitutions and or election laws to stay in power despite evidence the public would prefer for them to step down, ie given the general human preference to accept some potential tyranny for some internal peace, it's not too surprising that after almost 450 years of a system, people are willing to wait a while to see how things turn out.

The fact that Elisabeth didn't call on the commoners to revolt and wipe out the Conservatives, Progressives and Liberals went a long way to ending any immediate urge to start stringing them up as you so desperately want.

3) Haven also had some recon intel on what the SDP's, CLAC's, and LAC's looked like, probably including how the pods were jettisoned etc; and not being stupid could figure out what the RMN had done.

If you've read the pearls on Bolthole and what Shannon did and didn't do, you'd remember how minimal her 'fixes' were; the RHN SDP's only carry 400 pods, not the 500+ the RMN and GSN's do etc, so the structural changes left as much as possible of the current ex-peep design the same.

4) "Quickly gets out of hand?" The civil war took around 3 years, the peace talks had dragged on for more than 4 years when she decided on Thunderbolt; for just how long do you think she should have waited when the congressional 'war party' was pushing her for a resumption, and High Ridge was doing everything he could to delay the elections that he knew he would lose?

Perhaps a review of President Madison's predicament and the start of the war of 1812 might be in order.

5) This has been answered repeatedly, including by RFC himself, but you have evidently further confused it in your mind, which doesn't surprise me at this point.

First, Haven hadn't manipulated the diplomatic correspondence when Cromarty was assassinated in 1915, that wasn't until 1919.

Second, the MAlign's assassination and attempts didn't happen until 1921, well into the second war if you didn't remember.

Third, Grendlesbane was destroyed in 1919 during Thunderbolt, when the RMN then had no chance of defeating the RHN; that's why they had to bring in the Andermanni, and splitting up Silesia was the price for that, remember?

Buttercup demonstrated the peeps had been defeated militarily and were no longer an immediate or existential threat, something Elisabeth had been facing for more than 30 years; so she had time to wait for High Ridge to destroy himself as she was confident he would.

After BoMA, there were a few other concerns to throw into the pot you keep forgetting; like Monica, New Tuscany, NTM how Manpower Inc, Mesa, NTM the SL were were behaving, which all changed the calculus of what the SEM had to deal with.

A thrashed Haven very willing to share its mil-tech with the SL was the last thing Elisabeth and her advisers wanted, but you do for some reason.

If Haven is no longer the greatest threat, is a real long term peace treaty mutually beneficial possible?

One of her best friends who's advice has always been good thinks so, so Elisabeth is willing to risk if it may cover her back when dealing with the SL, the 800 kilogram gorilla you keep seeming to forget.

6) RFC has dealt with this, you just don't seem to be listening; the republic has now had 7 years or things working better than they ever have in everyone's memory, and you think they're going to scrap it to bring back the misery of the peep's?

You might want to review the early republican period of the USA [1790's], when the citizen's pride and optimism in our nation was considerably greater than most have today.

Pretty much nobody wanted to bring back George III.

7) Again, you aren't paying attention.

At what point in time does a country go from fragile to strong in your eyes?

Do we have to wait 25 or 50 years before we no longer consider them fragile?

Sorry, real life doesn't permit that luxury, so why do you keep bringing it up?

But if you're the head of state, you deal with the cards you get including however old your nearest potential threat may be.

8) There is quite a bit of relief on both sides you're ignoring, but the RoH obviously thought it was time when they accepted Honor's offer, the SEM in relief that they wouldn't face the SL alone, so a win-win for both that each understands quite easily, except for you.

Honor, as another poster pointed out very well, has been critical to this path of reconciliation, and history is replete with many examples of the 'great man' being an actor for decades so you should be used to it, if you're a student of history.

Yes, RFC's original 20 year timeline was compressed as a result of FtH; you should have noticed the repeated mentioning of the changes triggered by that story.

I among others had hoped for the original notes dealing with that intention to be printed, since they weren't pertinent to the series as it now stands; but RFC decided to hold onto those, probably because he always keeps his hole cards close. ;)

L


DarkEnigma wrote:I was all set to let this thread die and move on (I swear!), but one of the quotes in the "Honorverse Favorite Passages" thread crystallized one final point in my brain. It isn't really an argument: more an observation.

We have gone over the events which lead to the formation of the Grand Alliance with a fine-toothed comb, and for the most part, every issue myself and others have brought up does have a plausible reasoning behind it. However, when you string them all together, things start to seem perhaps a bit too convenient.

1) Haven's economy recovers such that the impetus which drove it into conquest is absent and thus allows Haven to end the war without suffering catastrophic collapse (as well as fund their triumphant return to parity militarily with Manticore).

2) High Ridge seizes power and promptly accepts Saint-Just's offer of cease-fire with all out victory only weeks away (He does this despite the opportunity to be the Prime Minister who "won the war" and co-opt decades of Cromarty's hard work. The people of Manticore accept his decision and do not feel that this is a disrespect to the men and women who lost their lives in the war).

3) Haven had Bolthole, primed with raw materials, engineers, supply chain, funding, et cetera which put them in prime position to capitalize on High Ridge's rank stupidity in very short order.

4) Pritchart, for whatever combination of reasons, starts down a path of increasingly aggressive stances towards Manticore which quickly (predictably?) gets out of hand.

5) Despite Haven killing her father and her Prime Minister, despite knowing Haven manipulated correspondence, despite the assassination attempts on Torch and Old Terra (et cetera, et cetera), Queen Elizabeth gives up the opportunity to finish off Haven twice and allows herself to be talked into letting Haven off the hook after Buttercup, and again after Gendelsbane, and again after the Battle of Manticore.

6) After being largely politically apathetic under the Legislaturalists, and learning to distrust their central government under the Committee for Public Safety, the people of Haven quickly rally behind and become positively engaged in the new Republic despite its unproven and fragile nature.

7) After the Legislaturalists and the CPS both meet their demise at the point of a gun, Manticoran leaders are quickly convinced that that won't happen to the new Republic despite its unproven and fragile nature.

8) The people of both Haven and Manticore are ready and willing to bury the hatchet when their leaders deem it is time to do so.

There are probably other lynchpins that I am missing but I think you can see my point. As I said before, each of these has a plausible explanation, and, when looked at in isolation, makes perfect sense. However, If any of the links in this chain did not exist, Haven and Manticore probably do not end up bosom buddies (or at least not nearly as quickly).

I suppose that my major complaint is that, overall, the transition of Haven from bitter enemy to ally feels contrived. There is an overall sense that the events are not "organic" but rather that people and events are shoehorned towards a predestined conclusion IMHO. I hope you will believe me when I say that the preceding post was not borne of sour grapes but rather an attempt to express genuine opinion.

P.S. The quote which got me thinking about all this was this one:

**quote="cthia"**Regarding the reason of why Elizabeth should trust Eloise is echoed in this passage...

A Rising Thunder
“Oh, I’m not worried about that.”

Elizabeth waved one hand. She and Pritchart had discussed the president’s concerns in detail, and the empress was convinced the other woman was worrying unduly. Yes, the Battle of Manticore had killed an enormous number of people, but far fewer than the Yawata Strike, and all of them had been military casualties. Unlike the people behind the Yawata Strike, the Republic had scrupulously avoided preventable civilian casualties. After fifteen T-years fighting the People’s Republic, even the most anti-Havenite Manticoran had been only too well aware of what a change that represented, and the contrast with the slaughter of the Yawata Strike only underscored the difference. Say what the most bigoted Manticoran might, the restored Republic had fought its war with honor, and the majority of Manticorans knew it.
**quote**

The reason this passage clicked something in my brain is because it feels a bit too determinative. There is a hint of "because I said so" behind every sentence. People can often be irrationally emotional after all (honorably conducted or not, after Grendelsbane, the Battle of Manticore, et cetera Manticorans would have some justification for residual resentments).

The real world is often messy and people are often unpredictable which sometimes leads to less-than-perfect outcomes despite the best of intentions. The events which put Manticore and Haven on the fast-track to BFF status, however, feel just a bit contrived overall. It is, however, the only issue of consequence in this very lengthy series which strikes me so. IMHO. YMMV.
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: The Problem with Haven
Post by crewdude48   » Sun Jun 29, 2014 3:07 am

crewdude48
Commodore

Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:08 am

I suspect, what this comes down to, is that there are some people who will never fully trust their former enemies. There is still a bit of a divide between the northern and southern states. I am sure there are Manties who would rather spit on Theisman than walk away from him. Even the most logical, well thought out arguments couldn't convince them to like the other side. Even with the Queen telling them to sit on it, the best you could get from them is "I won't start nothing if they don't start nothing.". The fact that there is clear proof that somebody else manipulated them into war will only make these people think that those Damn Peeps should have been smarter.

Some people on both sides are going to say "We should have crushed them right there at the end." And both sides had the resources to do it, kind of. The fact of the matter is that they are in the minority, not in hugely influential positions, and have to be accounted for but can mostly be ignored. And, not to be an a-hole, the same can be said about DarkEnigma.

lyonheart wrote:Hi DarkEnigma,

No I don't think you want to bury this right now, so in answer to your points, consider the following:

1) This has been answered repeatedly, but did you read the pearls or RFC 's comments?

Given the republic has succeeded at whatever cost to build one of the two most powerful navies in existence in just a few years after being faced with military defeat without foreign help, ought to indicate the power of the republic's now unfettered economy, yet you keep missing all the clues.

2) Looking at the number of countries currently putting up with 'presidents' etc who have violated their local constitutions and or election laws to stay in power despite evidence the public would prefer for them to step down, ie given the general human preference to accept some potential tyranny for some internal peace, it's not too surprising that after almost 450 years of a system, people are willing to wait a while to see how things turn out.

The fact that Elisabeth didn't call on the commoners to revolt and wipe out the Conservatives, Progressives and Liberals went a long way to ending any immediate urge to start stringing them up as you so desperately want.

3) Haven also had some recon intel on what the SDP's, CLAC's, and LAC's looked like, probably including how the pods were jettisoned etc; and not being stupid could figure out what the RMN had done.

If you've read the pearls on Bolthole and what Shannon did and didn't do, you'd remember how minimal her 'fixes' were; the RHN SDP's only carry 400 pods, not the 500+ the RMN and GSN's do etc, so the structural changes left as much as possible of the current ex-peep design the same.

4) "Quickly gets out of hand?" The civil war took around 3 years, the peace talks had dragged on for more than 4 years when she decided on Thunderbolt; for just how long do you think she should have waited when the congressional 'war party' was pushing her for a resumption, and High Ridge was doing everything he could to delay the elections that he knew he would lose?

Perhaps a review of President Madison's predicament and the start of the war of 1812 might be in order.

5) This has been answered repeatedly, including by RFC himself, but you have evidently further confused it in your mind, which doesn't surprise me at this point.

First, Haven hadn't manipulated the diplomatic correspondence when Cromarty was assassinated in 1915, that wasn't until 1919.

Second, the MAlign's assassination and attempts didn't happen until 1921, well into the second war if you didn't remember.

Third, Grendlesbane was destroyed in 1919 during Thunderbolt, when the RMN then had no chance of defeating the RHN; that's why they had to bring in the Andermanni, and splitting up Silesia was the price for that, remember?

Buttercup demonstrated the peeps had been defeated militarily and were no longer an immediate or existential threat, something Elisabeth had been facing for more than 30 years; so she had time to wait for High Ridge to destroy himself as she was confident he would.

After BoMA, there were a few other concerns to throw into the pot you keep forgetting; like Monica, New Tuscany, NTM how Manpower Inc, Mesa, NTM the SL were were behaving, which all changed the calculus of what the SEM had to deal with.

A thrashed Haven very willing to share its mil-tech with the SL was the last thing Elisabeth and her advisers wanted, but you do for some reason.

If Haven is no longer the greatest threat, is a real long term peace treaty mutually beneficial possible?

One of her best friends who's advice has always been good thinks so, so Elisabeth is willing to risk if it may cover her back when dealing with the SL, the 800 kilogram gorilla you keep seeming to forget.

6) RFC has dealt with this, you just don't seem to be listening; the republic has now had 7 years or things working better than they ever have in everyone's memory, and you think they're going to scrap it to bring back the misery of the peep's?

You might want to review the early republican period of the USA [1790's], when the citizen's pride and optimism in our nation was considerably greater than most have today.

Pretty much nobody wanted to bring back George III.

7) Again, you aren't paying attention.

At what point in time does a country go from fragile to strong in your eyes?

Do we have to wait 25 or 50 years before we no longer consider them fragile?

Sorry, real life doesn't permit that luxury, so why do you keep bringing it up?

But if you're the head of state, you deal with the cards you get including however old your nearest potential threat may be.

8) There is quite a bit of relief on both sides you're ignoring, but the RoH obviously thought it was time when they accepted Honor's offer, the SEM in relief that they wouldn't face the SL alone, so a win-win for both that each understands quite easily, except for you.

Honor, as another poster pointed out very well, has been critical to this path of reconciliation, and history is replete with many examples of the 'great man' being an actor for decades so you should be used to it, if you're a student of history.

Yes, RFC's original 20 year timeline was compressed as a result of FtH; you should have noticed the repeated mentioning of the changes triggered by that story.

I among others had hoped for the original notes dealing with that intention to be printed, since they weren't pertinent to the series as it now stands; but RFC decided to hold onto those, probably because he always keeps his hole cards close. ;)

L


DarkEnigma wrote:I was all set to let this thread die and move on (I swear!), but one of the quotes in the "Honorverse Favorite Passages" thread crystallized one final point in my brain. It isn't really an argument: more an observation.

We have gone over the events which lead to the formation of the Grand Alliance with a fine-toothed comb, and for the most part, every issue myself and others have brought up does have a plausible reasoning behind it. However, when you string them all together, things start to seem perhaps a bit too convenient.

1) Haven's economy recovers such that the impetus which drove it into conquest is absent and thus allows Haven to end the war without suffering catastrophic collapse (as well as fund their triumphant return to parity militarily with Manticore).

2) High Ridge seizes power and promptly accepts Saint-Just's offer of cease-fire with all out victory only weeks away (He does this despite the opportunity to be the Prime Minister who "won the war" and co-opt decades of Cromarty's hard work. The people of Manticore accept his decision and do not feel that this is a disrespect to the men and women who lost their lives in the war).

3) Haven had Bolthole, primed with raw materials, engineers, supply chain, funding, et cetera which put them in prime position to capitalize on High Ridge's rank stupidity in very short order.

4) Pritchart, for whatever combination of reasons, starts down a path of increasingly aggressive stances towards Manticore which quickly (predictably?) gets out of hand.

5) Despite Haven killing her father and her Prime Minister, despite knowing Haven manipulated correspondence, despite the assassination attempts on Torch and Old Terra (et cetera, et cetera), Queen Elizabeth gives up the opportunity to finish off Haven twice and allows herself to be talked into letting Haven off the hook after Buttercup, and again after Gendelsbane, and again after the Battle of Manticore.

6) After being largely politically apathetic under the Legislaturalists, and learning to distrust their central government under the Committee for Public Safety, the people of Haven quickly rally behind and become positively engaged in the new Republic despite its unproven and fragile nature.

7) After the Legislaturalists and the CPS both meet their demise at the point of a gun, Manticoran leaders are quickly convinced that that won't happen to the new Republic despite its unproven and fragile nature.

8) The people of both Haven and Manticore are ready and willing to bury the hatchet when their leaders deem it is time to do so.

There are probably other lynchpins that I am missing but I think you can see my point. As I said before, each of these has a plausible explanation, and, when looked at in isolation, makes perfect sense. However, If any of the links in this chain did not exist, Haven and Manticore probably do not end up bosom buddies (or at least not nearly as quickly).

I suppose that my major complaint is that, overall, the transition of Haven from bitter enemy to ally feels contrived. There is an overall sense that the events are not "organic" but rather that people and events are shoehorned towards a predestined conclusion IMHO. I hope you will believe me when I say that the preceding post was not borne of sour grapes but rather an attempt to express genuine opinion.

P.S. The quote which got me thinking about all this was this one:

**quote="cthia"**Regarding the reason of why Elizabeth should trust Eloise is echoed in this passage...

A Rising Thunder
**quote**
“Oh, I’m not worried about that.”

Elizabeth waved one hand. She and Pritchart had discussed the president’s concerns in detail, and the empress was convinced the other woman was worrying unduly. Yes, the Battle of Manticore had killed an enormous number of people, but far fewer than the Yawata Strike, and all of them had been military casualties. Unlike the people behind the Yawata Strike, the Republic had scrupulously avoided preventable civilian casualties. After fifteen T-years fighting the People’s Republic, even the most anti-Havenite Manticoran had been only too well aware of what a change that represented, and the contrast with the slaughter of the Yawata Strike only underscored the difference. Say what the most bigoted Manticoran might, the restored Republic had fought its war with honor, and the majority of Manticorans knew it.**quote****quote**

The reason this passage clicked something in my brain is because it feels a bit too determinative. There is a hint of "because I said so" behind every sentence. People can often be irrationally emotional after all (honorably conducted or not, after Grendelsbane, the Battle of Manticore, et cetera Manticorans would have some justification for residual resentments).

The real world is often messy and people are often unpredictable which sometimes leads to less-than-perfect outcomes despite the best of intentions. The events which put Manticore and Haven on the fast-track to BFF status, however, feel just a bit contrived overall. It is, however, the only issue of consequence in this very lengthy series which strikes me so. IMHO. YMMV.
________________
I'm the Dude...you know, that or His Dudeness, or Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.
Top
Re: The Problem with Haven
Post by SWM   » Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:16 pm

SWM
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5928
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: U.S. east coast

DarkEnigma, I know that you aren't really complaining, so I won't belabor it. What you are saying is basically that it seems to you just a bit contrived that all these things happened to go this way.

I would just point out that even if the story went a different direction, it would still be the result of a series of events. If any one of those events went differently, it would change the result. Everything in the Honorverse (and in real history) is a result of a sequence of events and decisions. So, if the result turns out to be a good thing, does that make the sequence of events contrived?
--------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine
Top

Return to Honorverse