Roguevictory wrote:Are you talking about the upcoming Manticore Ascendant Travis Long series, or another new spin off series?
That's the one I was talking about, yeah. I got the eARC, thank you...
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 94 guests
Re: The Problem with Haven | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
hanuman
Posts: 643
|
That's the one I was talking about, yeah. I got the eARC, thank you... |
Top |
Re: The Problem with Haven | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Roguevictory
Posts: 421
|
Ahh I wasn't sure if another new one was coming that I hadn't heard about yet. Still the new series looks like it will be a lot of fun. |
Top |
Re: The Problem with Haven | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
namelessfly
|
Why do Duckks have webbed feet?
To stamp out flame wars. Why do Namelessfly's have flat feet?
Last edited by namelessfly on Thu Jun 26, 2014 12:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Top |
Re: The Problem with Haven | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Tenshinai
Posts: 2893
|
His feet gets stamped on too often. ![]() ![]() |
Top |
Re: The Problem with Haven | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
MaxxQ
Posts: 1553
|
I was thinking more along the lines of the Banhammer™, which, as most people who've been on forums long enough know, is a pretty powerful weapon (although some who are vanquished with it seem to be vampires and don't really die - they just come back under another name). =================
Honorverse Art: http://maxxqbunine.deviantart.com/ Honorverse Video: http://youtu.be/fy8e-3lrKGE http://youtu.be/uEiGEeq8SiI http://youtu.be/i99Ufp_wAnQ http://youtu.be/byq68MjOlJU |
Top |
Re: The Problem with Haven | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
Quotes reordered to avoid embedded quotes limit.
Actually the ships that construction was suspended on at Grendelsbane were much farther from completion when construction was suspended. (The ships that construction was suspended on in the Manticore Binary System were completed first, according to a post by runsforcelery, because they were immediately available for restarting construction on. And any money spent on those ships instead of the ones at Grendelsbane would immediately go back into Manticore's economy.) Janacek speaking at a meeting of the High Ridge Government: Italics are the author's, boldface and underlined text is my emphasis. When Haven finally went ahead with Thunderbolt (much later, after Janacek had resumed construction) the ships at Grendelsbane were only a couple of weeks away from trials. White Haven speaking to Admiral MacDonnell of the GSN at Trevor's Star: Italics are the author's, boldface is my emphasis. -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |
Re: The Problem with Haven | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
SWM
Posts: 5928
|
Yes, as a matter of fact, Haven DID return it's own conquests back to their own governments if they voted to do so. Pritchart set up elections on all of the systems under their control, and allowed any that voted to leave the newly re-established Republic of Haven to become independent. And Pritchart was not demanding that Manticore turn it's conquests over to Haven; Pritchart was demanding that Manticore allow it's conquests to have exactly the same vote on whether to be part of the Republic of Haven that Haven's other systems already had been given. --------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine |
Top |
Re: The Problem with Haven | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Tenshinai
Posts: 2893
|
And refusing that, seriously bad for public relations of Manticore so to speak... |
Top |
Re: The Problem with Haven | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
DarkEnigma
Posts: 21
|
Yes, getting into a debate with the series own creator is a bit like bringing a vibroblade to a pulser fight but honor demands that I at least make an attempt. ![]()
I'll stipulate that Theisman was able to thoroughly clean house and remove all vestiges of the CPS. I'll also stipulate that the citizens of Haven are genuinely invested in their government this time around and are making every effort to help it work (you are in far better position than I to judge public sentiment after all). I would only point out, once again, that both the Legislaturalists and the CPS had recently (for prolong anyway) met their demises at the point of a gun. Any Manticoran analyst capable of wiping the drool off his chin is going to take note of that fact and be cautious of placing any long term bets on the fragile new Republic's longevity. A phased plan in which Haven meets some metrics of success before Manticore hands over the crown jewels seems appropriate here. Stipulate to all points as this also has to do with public sentiment.
Such a matter of principle that she was willing to plunge two star nations back into war and kill hundreds of thousands of people to secure it? This, after all, is the crux of the entire matter: did Pritchart have an honorable justification to go to war. I'll stipulate that Haven was genuinely giving stars systems they had previously taken over the choice to leave. I'll also stipulate that Haven (and Manticore) had every legal right to resume hostilities at any time, and that High Ridge was purposefully using that nominal state of war for callous political ends. However, Pritchart had to know that this situation could not last forever. At some point, High Ridge would have to hold elections and have to end the pretenses with which he was stalling negotiations. My question is, what was so pressing about getting these systems back that Prichart had to take such an aggressive posture such as having Tom Theisman wave a huge stick under Manticore's nose (and forcing them to respond accordingly)? Was Manticore somehow abusing their captured systems? Would it have made any difference to Haven's captured systems if Eloise had adopted a "wait and see" approach until Manticore came to its senses? Also, as you have stated yourself, Pritchart was open to negotiating which systems were returned to Haven at all (she was entirely willing to give up on Trevor's Star for example). Which begs the question, if she held it as an article of faith that Haven's former systems deserved self-determination, why she be willing to parcel them out in penny-packets over the negotiating table ? Finally, as I recall, it was Arnold Giancola's plan to diffuse tensions between Manticore and Haven and thus be the hero, but even he miscalculated Pritchart's bloody-mindedness. Is it at all possible that Prichart's decision to thump her chest and aggressively press Manticore over these systems was born of something less-than-honorable (such as pride, greed, or simple pique)? When a honorable leader decides to go to war it should be because they have no other choice, but I still fail to see how Haven had no choice but to go to war. For the sake of time, I will stipulate to the rest of your points and concede that, once active hostilities resumed, Haven acted honorably. However, I wonder if you would be willing to answer a question that has been nagging me since it doesn't seem to jibe with my assessment of Elizabeth's character: Why did Elizabeth not push for total victory during Buttercup or after the Battle of Manticore? P.S. Many people have up the fact that Elizabeth had Treecat lie detectors. This is true, however a Treecat can only tell you if a particular person is being truthful at this particular moment. They cannot vouch for that persons future actions especially if that person is only one part of a much larger polity. |
Top |
Re: The Problem with Haven | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Tenshinai
Posts: 2893
|
BACK into war? Manticore was the side that continually REFUSED to END it.
RFC already answered that. Like what someone else effectively said, well duh...
Why? What´s to say that government isn´t capable of rigging the next election? You´re making up excuses that doesn´t hold even a moment of scrutiny.
The fact that Manticore was essentially waving a nuclearpowered chainsaw under Haven´s nose?
Irrelevant. They were occupying them as part of an ongoing WAR.
What "bloody-mindedness" would that be? Again, you´re making up excuses for one side and blaming the other for everything and taxes. You´re even mudslinging against characters, even though we are shown a lot of HOW THEY ACTUALLY THINK, in the books.
![]() And you don´t see what that means... |
Top |