BobfromSydney wrote:Apart from strongly religious/ideological (and I include North Korea dictatorship-cult situations here a la Warneke) motivations I don't really see the point over demolishing a planet in the first place.
The main reasons to go to war is either conquest or possibly trade. Killing billions just to take out a trade competitor seems so disproportionate that it should be unthinkable. When it comes to conquest why would you want to destroy the prime habitable real estate in the system you intend to conquer?
Multi-stellar empires can lose one planet - especially if it's a smaller or poorer one - and remain few conquests. Even reducing their viability as trade rivals, if we're talking about sufficiently large powers, may be a goal of such value that killing a couple billion people for it may be proportionate in some calculus that has neutralized right and wrong and moral indignation and rage.
There's also the threat of extreme, escalated response to nudge an enemy into limiting their claims. It's that fear of escalation that kept the Cold War from getting even close to a point where nuclear weapons would be a reasonable move for the other party. Apparently either (1) conquest by Haven was not quite so bad as to justify even private cabals from threatening to "go Eridani" against them, or (2) those private cabals worried that their planets would be treated as their sponsors by the SLN, or (3) going Eridani was just not something that would occur to them. (2) doesn't seem perfectly plausible to me, though I wouldn't rule it out entirely. (3) seems unlikely given how many planets Haven conquered, but it may account for some of it. So I figure (1) had to be doing most or all of the work, which means either (i) conquest by Haven was bad but livable, and Haven may have assured that precisely to
keep anyone from going Eridani on them, and/or (ii) people in the Haven Quadrant have a far higher regard for life than we do now, bless them.
I think I've also come up with one more reason why the Mesan Alignment would not want to commit any EE violations:
It's got thousands (millions?) of sleeper agents scattered across human space. How would it ensure the loyalty and silence of these agents if it started committing giga-death atrocities? Committing EE violations might create a legion of McBrydes and smash the onion into pulp.
Just for example, take someone like Audrey O'Hanrahan:
If some mysterious EE violation (or a series of them) occurred which benefited the MAlign's goals, who thinks she would not figure out that the MAlign was behind it?
Now I have to wonder how heavily indoctrinated she is and whether or not she would go public with what she knows as a result. My reading of the character is that she does have a conscience and it is unlikely that her conscience would be able to tolerate such direct mass murder.
Yeah. The Alignment isn't really composed of sociopaths. They do have instead varying degrees of ideological blinkers that counter those consciences with dehumanization of likely victims, the sense that the glorious future they are buying is worth the price, and not thinking about some of it too hard or too often. The less you're in the Onion, the less the selective inattention and downplaying of the costs will work for you, and it failed entirely for Jack McBryde.
O'Hanrahan is likely to carry on a lot longer, I think, not for lack of conscience or insulation from the world outside the Onion - I don't think her conscience is at all defective, and she's got
no insulation from the world - but because she's got so much less need-to-know about the Alignment's plans and what it will entail. If she figured it all out, she'd be a big security problem for her. I suspect she's got someone ready to assassinate her at need.
For those deepest in the Onion, I think they're not committing Eridani violations (yet) in some small part because there aren't uses for them (yet), but in larger part because they respect a taboo against their use. The actual amount of death and suffering the Plan has caused and will cause vastly outweighs a few billion people destroyed in an instant - funny how people forget 30+ generations of slaves raped constantly through their childhoods, for example, as part of
cover - but they'll hesitate to kill a large bunch at a time relatively cleanly.
So even in that worst case of consciences kept in the dark and distracted, able to get along with monstrosities, there's still a big hesitation to do this one particular sort of crime.