Sigs wrote:The ships might be useful, but the crew's would be of questionable loyalty. We don't know how deep the MA has infiltrated the FF, the last thing you need is to use MA assets to hunt for the MA. Using frontier fleet in the verge might create the picture that the GA is nothing but Frontier Security with a new master.
The FF will need to be reorganised, definitely. But my point stands: change the leadership and the organisation should turn around. The MAlign did not have the ability, inclination, or need to infiltrate the FF by the tens of thousands. They had a few, key assets properly placed and those had a huge multiplying effect.
It's true that the direct agents of the MAlign were not the admirals themselves, but mid-ranking officers and enlisted crew, with sufficient access to said admirals. A change of leadership will not remove them by fiat, but if the new leadership is less prone to corruption, then the agents' advances should be somewhat limited. There's also the fact that the lines of communication with Darius may be very long right now, so those agents may not be able to act much.
Those few hundred were backed up by thousands of other who were willing to turn a blind eye to EE violations, who are corrupt in one way or another or are just plain incompetent. They have an entire Branch of their Military that is basically rent-a-thug, not even worth reorganizing into an army. The SLN has done a lot of very questionable things for decades if not centuries, changing the culture of the military would take several decades of work during which there has to be constant overwatch on the of the navy to prevent return to corruption. Basicly there are 150,000,000 people in the navy, trying to root out the bad apples when the entire organization has done business that way forever will a massive undertaking.
OFS and the Gendarmerie are getting disbanded. But the SLN Marines and Navy officers can be redeemed, with enough time and effort.
In your metaphor, you can throw a chest of 150 million apples because a few thousand, even ten thousand, are bad. Less than 0.01%.
The problem is did their actions during the war and their actions for the decades preceding the war permanently damage their reputation? They were prepared to carry out the murder of their own civilians, the attacks on those systems could have caused tens or hundreds of millions of casualties if not billions by blindly firing while retreating, they were ready to carry out those actions, the comparison would be whether you trust to bring the SS back post war, after they were willing to commit atrocities and actually committed atrocities during the war.
I don't think it's permanently damaged, not like the SS or the OFS. But I don't have hard facts to prove that, it's just an impression.
I was going with the assumption that a lot of the shell systems are quite powerful as well, not as powerful as the core but many would come close. Otherwise the GA has little to fear in terms of revenge from the League if they can rebuild Manticore, Beowulf and Grayson along with any core systems that join the GA or at least become allies they can be a major countering force to the League. That is before all the newly liberated verge and protectorates are factored, all of them are poor and under developed but many will be very motivated and with the right approach, in a few decades the GA can have many new powerful allies or members from what used to be the verge and protectorates.
But if the League has only 50 core worlds and the rest are the equivalent of Talbott Quadrant in terms of industrialization I would say that they would have to go with a hybrid, the shell systems wont be able to put up much of a fight and the core systems will not be willing to fund hundreds of SD's to protect everyone. To be fair though, financially the SLN was funded in large part through fees collected from trade, if you cut it in half and eliminate the fees from the protectorates, the SLN should easily maintain 700 SD's before having to resort to taxation, eliminate the corruption, waste and bloat and you can probably triple that before there is even a tax.
I think I wasn't clear. I didn't mean the majority of the Shell are Talbott-like. The newest members probably are, though, which is where my comparison to Montana and Split come into play. The ones closest to the Core are probably like Alizon and Zanzibar: rich and industrialised enough that they could field something between one SD and one squadron. But I don't think there's more than 200 of these. That's still 2000 to 3000 SDs, but the existing SD count in all the SDFs in the Shell was already probably approaching 1000. Tripling the number of available ships of the wall would be no small feat, but it's not an order of magnitude increase.
I think RFC said somewhere that there are about 50 navies called "first rate" and he defined them as being able to field at least one squadron of SDs. That goes in line with what the other thread discussed: anything below one squadron of ships of the wall is probably a misallocation of resources. Either you field one full or slightly understrength squadron (6 ships or more), or you invest in BCs. So a system like Alizon that is rich enough to buy an SD would hardly have it in its own system most of the time: that ship should be with the neighbours', training, so they can act as a squadron if the need arises. I don't see the systems investing in that, especially not in peace time.
I might be underselling the League, though.