cthia wrote:Not exclusively. TEiF testified to the fact that most of the Leagues' own acquisitions were made unwittingly. And the unions rarely resulted in any economic benefit to anyone else but the SL. They were RobbingHoods, robbing from the hoods and giving to the greedy. That is how the League was built, under the guise of protection, from the SL.
Please point out the text, because that certainly was not true for the core worlds. If it was where the Navy was looking for a mission for which it could be proud, I took it to mean compared to the activities in the Verge and Protectorates. Frontier Fleet operations were almost exclusively on the fringes of Solarian space. This is from Pearls of Weber in "How is the Solarian League organized?":
The League can actually be thought of as a sort of vast association of smaller political units. Many of those smaller units are multi-system in nature: three or four or a dozen systems united by common astrography, political concerns, economic ties, etc. Others--like Old Earth herself, Beowulf, and many of the other oldest "core worlds" lying within a couple of hundred light-years of Sol--are single-system political entities whose individual power make them forces to be reckoned with. The frontiers of the League tend to be somewhat amorphous, and the planets/systems in those regions are much more in the nature of dependencies/protectorates than actual "members" of the League. As a general rule, the League is not truly expansionist, but there are always forces and individuals within the League (and especially within its huge bureaucracy) with views of their own. For the UK citizens in our audience, think in terms of Mr. Rhodes and Africa. Thus many of the smaller/weaker/poorer systems on the borders of League space tend to find themselves being "assisted" into "accepting" League protection whether they want it or not, and very few people on the core worlds even realize it's happening.
But protection is not automatically membership.