Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Theemile and 57 guests

BC(P)s at Sidemore

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: BC(P)s at Sidemore
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Tue Dec 09, 2014 11:50 pm

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

n7axw wrote:I can see it both ways. On the one hand, if the thread has died a natural death, it can seem like a rehash to the folks who are old timers on the board.

But on the other hand, newbys who come up and start new threads often find their ideas stomped on by those who have already been there and done that.

So what's better? Resurrecting an old thread and making it available for the newbys to educate themselves or allow the newbys to explore their ideas in a new thread?

Dunno. But I do know for someone to come by and squash a discussion because they find it old stuff can be irritating and is certainly not hospitible to someone new to the forum.

Don

What he said. I was perhaps overly harsh in another thread in response to SWM comment, but I think it is wise for the old hands to remember that not everyone has been on this forum since 2010, or whenever. Perhaps a private message to the individual might have been in order, not responding to many of his resurrections with a rather curt "Why are you doing this?"
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: BC(P)s at Sidemore
Post by Hutch   » Wed Dec 10, 2014 10:24 am

Hutch
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1831
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:40 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama y'all

fallsfromtrees wrote:
n7axw wrote:I can see it both ways. On the one hand, if the thread has died a natural death, it can seem like a rehash to the folks who are old timers on the board.

But on the other hand, newbys who come up and start new threads often find their ideas stomped on by those who have already been there and done that.

So what's better? Resurrecting an old thread and making it available for the newbys to educate themselves or allow the newbys to explore their ideas in a new thread?

Dunno. But I do know for someone to come by and squash a discussion because they find it old stuff can be irritating and is certainly not hospitible to someone new to the forum.

Don

What he said. I was perhaps overly harsh in another thread in response to SWM comment, but I think it is wise for the old hands to remember that not everyone has been on this forum since 2010, or whenever. Perhaps a private message to the individual might have been in order, not responding to many of his resurrections with a rather curt "Why are you doing this?"


As one from the middle (not an 'old hand' from the early days of the Forum but with several years and ovewr 1300 posts, not a 'newbie' either), I think one of the major issues was not that old threads were resurrected (that has been done now and then), but that 12-15 were brought forward from the archives and bumped the current discussions down the Forum and in some cases to page 2 and 3 of the lists. I think this is what has made many folks unhappy--not the old threads (some of which have resumed their activity), but the sheer number and disruption it cuased to current conversations.

If I could offer a compromise, if you want to bring an old thread forward because you feel you have something to add to it, do so; but don't bring 10-15 old threads all at once and 'spam' the current discussions; that tends to make many (including me) grumpy...and you won't like us when we're grumpy... :o 8-) :lol:

*Removes Henry Clay 'the Great Compromiser" hat*
***********************************************
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.

What? Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here! Boom. Sooner or later. BOOM! -LT. Cmdr. Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5
Top
Re: BC(P)s at Sidemore
Post by SharkHunter   » Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:46 pm

SharkHunter
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:53 pm
Location: Independence, Missouri

Hutch wrote:If I could offer a compromise, if you want to bring an old thread forward because you feel you have something to add to it, do so; but don't bring 10-15 old threads all at once and 'spam' the current discussions; that tends to make many (including me) grumpy...and you won't like us when we're grumpy... :o 8-) :lol: *Removes Henry Clay 'the Great Compromiser" hat*


Ya lost me -- but I think I understand the adverse effect. The fact that I brought up some old threads bounced more active threads down in the forum order (?), which is a bad thing...

Duly noted, maybe a "here's the polite way to play" thread could be pinned to the top somewhere?
---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all
Top
Re: BC(P)s at Sidemore
Post by Hutch   » Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:53 pm

Hutch
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1831
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:40 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama y'all

SharkHunter wrote:
Hutch wrote:If I could offer a compromise, if you want to bring an old thread forward because you feel you have something to add to it, do so; but don't bring 10-15 old threads all at once and 'spam' the current discussions; that tends to make many (including me) grumpy...and you won't like us when we're grumpy... :o 8-) :lol: *Removes Henry Clay 'the Great Compromiser" hat*


Ya lost me -- but I think I understand the adverse effect. The fact that I brought up some old threads bounced more active threads down in the forum order (?), which is a bad thing...

Duly noted, maybe a "here's the polite way to play" thread could be pinned to the top somewhere?



Nah, a little newbie abuse is a good thing... :twisted:
***********************************************
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.

What? Look, somebody's got to have some damn perspective around here! Boom. Sooner or later. BOOM! -LT. Cmdr. Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5
Top
Re: BC(P)s at Sidemore
Post by n7axw   » Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:21 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Hutch is right, Sharkhunter. But it it doesn't mean you should take too much bulls**t from the "old salts."

In fairness to Hutch, he doesn't hand it out.

Don
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top

Return to Honorverse